Topic: [GLBSE] GEM - Invest in Diamonds!!! - page 2. (Read 17976 times)

how exactly would I go about buying a share from https://glbse.com ?

I had not looked into pricing for clarity higher than these for this holding of stones. Additions to the holding will be of a similar nature in order to keep the the shares easier to manage.

Since the value of the shares is directly tied to the actual stones, it is important to be able to keep them in an exchangeable form. This is why there is an equal number of stones for an equal number of shares. Increasing the physical holdings affects the value of the shares from both the BTC side and the potential for redeeming shares for physical goods.

Of course, any way I can find to increase the value of the holding will be explored.

  how much more do u have to pay for IF or VVS diamonds ? Since the stones are very small, the clarity won't be a big problem. Colour seems to be fine.

Very well said on both accounts.

The point of the shares is not to keep them at 1BTC but to increase the overall value of the holdings that the shares are tied to. The value of BTC is what makes things additionally interesting. If shares are at 1BTC, but BTC are worth $6, I would say we are all doing well

And you are correct on the exponential value side. A one carat diamond is worth significantly more than 1 carat total weight of 1pt diamonds. That was why I mentioned aiming for 2pt stones. 1ctw of 2pt stones is worth more than 1ctw of 1pt stones.


The colour range on this lot is G-H.

FWIW, the price of gemstones scales exponentially size.  A 1 carat diamond costs more than 100 1-pt diamonds even though the total weight is the same.  It's not like precious metals where 2 half-ounce coins are basically worth as much as a single one once coin.  You can't melt down and combine gems.

If I understand the way things work, I don't want c0ffer buying shares back to keep the price at 1 BTC.  I want him buying more diamonds when the price of BTC (hopefully) hits 6.

There are currently 100 shares. One share is worth one diamond, weighing 1pt. valued at $3 when issued. When the shares were issued, the ask for one share was one BTC, worth approximately the same as one of the diamonds represented in the holding.

The diamonds in the holding are still worth $3. BTC is worth more than $3 right now so if anyone else is selling shares, they are asking for a little less than 1 BTC since the dollar to BTC conversion works that way. The diamonds still weigh 1pt and there are still 100 of them in the holding.



It fell 10% in BTC while the value of BTC went up. Since this is an experiment in tying the value of the shares/BTC to the value of diamonds, this looks to be correct, even though the volumes are not worth mention.

For price support, the market seems to be working fine based on the initial stated objectives of tying shares/BTC to 1pt diamonds.

I have pulled my initial 1BTC ask and may list a lower offering. I may also list a higher one if the BTC/dollar conversion drops again. I may add another carat and add another 100 shares. I may be successful in turning over enough carats to switch the holdings to 2pt diamonds or better making the shares worth significantly more. There are many variables in play and that is the excitement and fun of this experiment.

Growth of the fund can also come from profitable turnover of the holding and the value of shares adjusted accordingly. I am actively pursuing this route to grow the value of the shares and the overall holdings which is to my benefit and that of shareholders. This is all a learning process and will happen over time, it is not for everyone, but clearly a winner in a lot of ways. Also, the likelihood of the holdings depreciating in dollar value is almost non-existant.

I will eventually post more details at my site on the specific status of shares, holdings, valuations, etc.

The market will also drive the price I would hope



Clarity is VS to SI 1. I am waiting to hear back on the exact colour range for the lot. Obviously VS stones are more valuable than SI and colour is a factor too. The wholesale value price quoted is an average based on the high to low of the lot. One carat of the best quality diamonds in the lot would cost more than $300, where the same weight of the lower quality ones would cost less. More details will be coming on the website soon.

I still did not get an answer. Yes, I am selling sold the rest of my shares. I was anxious to get out of this.  It seems to me that it is nothing more than us paying the OP to expand his inventory.  He will issue shares until infinity and shareholders will never see a profit.

Anyone wanting to buy in to this fund, please put up a bid offer on the GLBSE.

What's the clarity of the diamonds ? Colour ?

tyvm



I wouldn't feel that way if I were you. In this form they are the elements of what could become jewelry. When you get to the stage of a final piece, there are many other elements that come into play that affect the value. If you were to weigh the gold in that ring you would find the spot value comparison to also be high. How much does silicon cost compared to chips, steel to cars, etc.

Once stones like these have found their way into a fine piece of jewelry the overall value increases and of course, you can't quantify the value of your fiance's appreciation for a nice ring

I have noticed activity in the shares even though the volume is quite low.


Although we are dealing with minimal numbers right now, this makes the most logical sense. The shares were initially released with BTC at about $3. BTC has gone up about 10% but the value of the stones remains the same so it would make sense that shares might trade at the difference.

I am examining options right now for ways to increase the value of the shares.

In the long term it will be interesting to see how this progresses.

That doesn't answer any of my questions.

This fund has fallen nearly 10% and the current highest bid is a 90% drop. Are you going to provide any price support for this fund? Wouldn't repurchasing shares at a lower cost be a way to meet your goal of adding additional assets per share?

Very very nice stones. 

Wish I had some extra bitcoins to invest into these. I can't believe how cheap wholesale diamonds are compared to the end market. I feel 'jipped' for the recent engagement ring I bought.

One pic showing some of the diamonds has been added to the original post. More to come

Cool thanks for the info.

I understand completely and I will have some more offers like that very soon.

I have several higher value stones available for sale and am in the process of adding them to my site. Once I have good pics available I will also post some here.

This GLBSE listing is meant more as an experiment in Bitcoin economics and tying BTC value to a physical commodity.

If you are looking for "investment grade" stones, I will be posting some very soon

I like the idea of purchasing gems with bitcoins. I would not mind to pay 30 and more BTC for a nice stone but for that we need better pics and more information. Something in this direction http://www.gemselect.com/sapphire/sapphire-304593.php

Motions will be put forth for actions that directly affect the value of the shares. The best example of this would be selling of the assets for the purposes of reinvesting into more diamonds of a similar nature. If there were to be a decent margin increase then this would directly affect the ultimate value of the shares since the holdings would increase from the original 1pt stone per share.

In a case where the overall holdings were being multiplied then a motion will not be put forth. The example here would be if I added another carat of 1pt diamonds right now, then another 100 shares would be issued. The opening for those shares would be based on the value of BTC at the time and/or market value of the existing shares, but there would be no motion for the addition.