Pages:
Author

Topic: GLBSE - request for next features - page 2. (Read 27744 times)

hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 513
GLBSE Support [email protected]
September 22, 2012, 05:38:45 PM
Allowing people to place multiple bids with the same BTC results in lots of what I see as spam orders, it's happened every time I've allowed it.

The only way to improve liquidity is to have more BTC on there, either in the form of peoples own BTC or margin.

Actually, at the bitcoin conference Meni was telling me that margin also performs the same functionality more or less as options. I didn't quite understand it at the time (I was pretty tired) but this is one of Meni's strengths.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
September 22, 2012, 05:30:06 PM
There are two ways liquidity could be improved, either Nefario gets it to work so people can place multiple bids with the same bitcoin, or people add more bitcoin and place more bids.

I often see great deals due to the low liquidity, the huge spreads on many assets. There are a couple assets I have been making like 5-10% per week buying and selling (but very low volumes), but I just don't have enough bitcoins to place bids on everything at once. There have been a few times somebody dumps shares and I say to myself I wish I had known they were going to sell, I would have bid much higher than they got.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 22, 2012, 03:41:50 PM
Would more liquidity appear if trading fees were shared on glbse ?  For example if someone buys shares the seller splits the cost of the fees 50/50 rather than just one side paying all the fees.

How would that improve liquidity?  That would remove one of the benefits of leaving an open order on the exchange.  I think it would have a negative effect on liquidity and result in more volatility and destabilization of assets.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
September 22, 2012, 06:33:24 AM
Would more liquidity appear if trading fees were shared on glbse ?  For example if someone buys shares the seller splits the cost of the fees 50/50 rather than just one side paying all the fees.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
September 22, 2012, 05:49:31 AM
Mark security issuers Buy and Sell orders with a different color in the order book.

I also like to add this one:
Make users bid/ask stand out from the order book (btc-e has it well implemented)
Highlight users bid/ask in the order book (btc-e has it well implemented).


I am going to bring this on up once more because we need more transparency to issuers actions and I think this is valuable for the investors too.
 

Wouldnt they just use sock puppet accounts ?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
September 21, 2012, 03:25:34 PM
Mark security issuers Buy and Sell orders with a different color in the order book.

I also like to add this one:
Make users bid/ask stand out from the order book (btc-e has it well implemented)
Highlight users bid/ask in the order book (btc-e has it well implemented).


I am going to bring this on up once more because we need more transparency to issuers actions and I think this is valuable for the investors too.
 

I think this is a good idea. The user's own orders could be highlighted yellow (and maybe have a cancel option on the asset page, so we don't have to go back to the portfolio to cancel, and then back to the asset page to replace the order when moving the price). The asset issuer's orders could be highlighted orange or something like that.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
September 21, 2012, 03:17:19 PM
Mark security issuers Buy and Sell orders with a different color in the order book.

I also like to add this one:
Make users bid/ask stand out from the order book (btc-e has it well implemented)
Highlight users bid/ask in the order book (btc-e has it well implemented).


I am going to bring this on up once more because we need more transparency to issuers actions and I think this is valuable for the investors too.
 
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
September 20, 2012, 02:32:38 PM
How about being able to open a demo account to have a play around before using real coin??
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
September 18, 2012, 08:58:36 PM
I would love it if you got a second chance to log in before having to do a captcha. I realize it's a balance between security and ease of use, but nearly every time I fail the login I end up doing the captcha between 5 and 10 times before I can get back in Sad

Also, the ability to establish a PGP key just in case we are unable to log in would be useful as a backup. We could simple sign a message to you proving our ownership of the account if necessary.

So you are suggesting GLBSE holds onto a database of the public keys corresponding to account emails?

Correct. Just an idea though.

It would definitely be nice if you could tie your ownership of shares to a GPG key.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 513
GLBSE Support [email protected]
September 18, 2012, 08:56:08 PM
With much thanks to LWCoder, I've added the GLBSE android client to the front page (you'll need to log out to see).

I've also ordered yubikeys, so will begin to add them as a 2fa method when they arrive.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 14, 2012, 07:31:25 PM
I would love some way to easily reply to and keep track of personal transfers.
Currently, they are just listed in the transfers in / out. It would be nice if it told me the account they were coming from / going to.
I believe someone else (on a whole other thread) found this information inside the full account CVS download. Though not the most direct way to get it.

Yes, I lost some time too before figuring it out.
sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
September 13, 2012, 09:48:43 AM
I would love some way to easily reply to and keep track of personal transfers.
Currently, they are just listed in the transfers in / out. It would be nice if it told me the account they were coming from / going to.
I believe someone else (on a whole other thread) found this information inside the full account CVS download. Though not the most direct way to get it.
donator
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
September 12, 2012, 04:20:04 PM
I would love it if you got a second chance to log in before having to do a captcha. I realize it's a balance between security and ease of use, but nearly every time I fail the login I end up doing the captcha between 5 and 10 times before I can get back in Sad

Also, the ability to establish a PGP key just in case we are unable to log in would be useful as a backup. We could simple sign a message to you proving our ownership of the account if necessary.

So you are suggesting GLBSE holds onto a database of the public keys corresponding to account emails?

Correct. Just an idea though.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
September 12, 2012, 04:14:41 PM
I would love it if you got a second chance to log in before having to do a captcha. I realize it's a balance between security and ease of use, but nearly every time I fail the login I end up doing the captcha between 5 and 10 times before I can get back in Sad

Also, the ability to establish a PGP key just in case we are unable to log in would be useful as a backup. We could simple sign a message to you proving our ownership of the account if necessary.

So you are suggesting GLBSE holds onto a database of the public keys corresponding to account emails?
donator
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
September 12, 2012, 03:45:52 PM
I would love it if you got a second chance to log in before having to do a captcha. I realize it's a balance between security and ease of use, but nearly every time I fail the login I end up doing the captcha between 5 and 10 times before I can get back in Sad

Also, the ability to establish a PGP key just in case we are unable to log in would be useful as a backup. We could simple sign a message to you proving our ownership of the account if necessary.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
September 03, 2012, 04:42:33 PM
A recent topic seems to be moving contracts out of GLBSE for security reasons, and another is being able to prove you actually possess shares. I'm sure this has been discussed somewhere, but both can be accomplished by an option to lock a certain number of owned shares (or all of it if easier) in your account for a specified number of days.

The locking process can provide a signed certificate of ownership that expires at a certain date. The lock should optionally get updated everyday. This way I will be certain that there is time delay in case my account gets compromised, and I'll get an e-mail notice when the locked shares get unlocked. It might also serve proof of ownership in an outage or an odd case of data corruption at GLBSE (assuming the keys aren't leaked, though they probably can be kept in a separate location).

Another functionality could be sending shares with a temporary lock, which would help making off-market transactions easier. If the receiving party doesn't pay, you'd have time to contest.


+1 with backups outside of glbse infrastructure/controle
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1002
September 03, 2012, 04:28:39 PM
A recent topic seems to be moving contracts out of GLBSE for security reasons, and another is being able to prove you actually possess shares. I'm sure this has been discussed somewhere, but both can be accomplished by an option to lock a certain number of owned shares (or all of it if easier) in your account for a specified number of days.

The locking process can provide a signed certificate of ownership that expires at a certain date. The lock should optionally get updated everyday. This way I will be certain that there is time delay in case my account gets compromised, and I'll get an e-mail notice when the locked shares get unlocked. It might also serve proof of ownership in an outage or an odd case of data corruption at GLBSE (assuming the keys aren't leaked, though they probably can be kept in a separate location).

Another functionality could be sending shares with a temporary lock, which would help making off-market transactions easier. If the receiving party doesn't pay, you'd have time to contest.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
August 28, 2012, 11:10:14 PM
s/freenet/freenode/ ? Smiley
well spotted. my fault. s/freenet/freenode
could go via gribble say/msg Smiley

Quote
I guess it would be fairly easy on any platform. I suggested e-mail (although it's not optimal for me) because everyone knows how to deal with that and it's pretty much decentralized. I'd create a new e-mail account for this, which I'll only access through my smartphone, yet I can still easily access from any other device if I need to.

2nd email address - for 2 factor auth email could be just fine
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1002
August 28, 2012, 10:26:04 PM
I couldn't manage to add GLBSE to my two-factor authentication with Google (I guess it doesn't work over SMS?), and I wasn't very eager anyway. Will you implement other authentication schemes? A jabber message would be good enough for me, though any generic protocol that's easy to setup with an external device should be fine. I guess e-mail would be the most generic one.

or pairing glbse account with freenet irc accounts, or wot at http://bitcoin-otc.com/
Wink
could you write that in ruby?

s/freenet/freenode/ ? Smiley

I guess it would be fairly easy on any platform. I suggested e-mail (although it's not optimal for me) because everyone knows how to deal with that and it's pretty much decentralized. I'd create a new e-mail account for this, which I'll only access through my smartphone, yet I can still easily access from any other device if I need to.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
August 28, 2012, 10:12:03 PM
I couldn't manage to add GLBSE to my two-factor authentication with Google (I guess it doesn't work over SMS?), and I wasn't very eager anyway. Will you implement other authentication schemes? A jabber message would be good enough for me, though any generic protocol that's easy to setup with an external device should be fine. I guess e-mail would be the most generic one.

or pairing glbse account with freenet irc accounts, or wot at http://bitcoin-otc.com/
Wink
could you write that in ruby?
Pages:
Jump to: