I'll be adding market maker fees, which will allow users to get paid 50BP(they won't pay any fees) when they make buy sell orders to provide liquidity.
Please don't. As I explained in another thread, these don't do anything functionally and just create more confusion and obfuscation. 
Topic: GLBSE2.0 has launched! - page 5. (Read 10554 times)
However, I have a GLBSE1 account which is completely empty, no assets or funds ...
then throw it away. register a new account in 2.0 and you're done.
the 2.0 link to claim old account remains visible also for users that already claimed their accounts.
I guess there's nothing to transfer so no claim code is generated.
the username in 1.0 was anyway only a locally stored label (see your key pair backup) and 2.0 is open to squat user names so hurry up ; )
Congrats.
I'll be adding market maker fees, which will allow users to get paid 50BP(they won't pay any fees) when they make buy sell orders to provide liquidity.
New asset fee will stay as-is.
This is great and smart idea to introduce a market maker into this market.
I'm excited to give it a go!
However, I have a GLBSE1 account (which is completely empty, no assets or funds) that doesn't give a proper claim # when I log in.
Same username as here on all the accounts. Should I just proceed on, or is there something you'd like to look at/fix?
However, I have a GLBSE1 account (which is completely empty, no assets or funds) that doesn't give a proper claim # when I log in.
Same username as here on all the accounts. Should I just proceed on, or is there something you'd like to look at/fix?
it started to charge fees. The liquidity of the market is still so not enough.
The new fee structure sucks.
New asset fee: 8.0 BTC
Dividends fee rate: 0 BP
Trade fee rate, paid by seller: 50 BP
it encourages new stocks to be issued, which will depress the stock price. And it discourages the trading, which dry the liquidity.
The new fee structure sucks.
New asset fee: 8.0 BTC
Dividends fee rate: 0 BP
Trade fee rate, paid by seller: 50 BP
it encourages new stocks to be issued, which will depress the stock price. And it discourages the trading, which dry the liquidity.
Trading volume compared to GLBSE1.0 is up considerably since launch, deposits have been rolling in and improvements are in the pipeline.
Plans are to have fees of 50BP for buyer and seller.
I'll be adding market maker fees, which will allow users to get paid 50BP(they won't pay any fees) when they make buy sell orders to provide liquidity.
New asset fee will stay as-is.
it started to charge fees. The liquidity of the market is still so not enough.
The new fee structure sucks.
New asset fee: 8.0 BTC
Dividends fee rate: 0 BP
Trade fee rate, paid by seller: 50 BP
it encourages new stocks to be issued, which will depress the stock price. And it discourages the trading, which dry the liquidity.
The new fee structure sucks.
New asset fee: 8.0 BTC
Dividends fee rate: 0 BP
Trade fee rate, paid by seller: 50 BP
it encourages new stocks to be issued, which will depress the stock price. And it discourages the trading, which dry the liquidity.
Sorry for the downtime and delay, please keep in mind that it was Sunday evening/night that it was brought down.
Issues should have been sorted out, GLBSE.com is back up and running.
Happy trading.
Nefario.
Issues should have been sorted out, GLBSE.com is back up and running.
Happy trading.
Nefario.
Thanks!
Great work Nefario!
Would you say that it's stable enough to launch an IPO or should a wait a bit for the kinks to be worked out?
Would you say that it's stable enough to launch an IPO or should a wait a bit for the kinks to be worked out?
I'm working on a security risk that I've just found, as I said in another post it's not a vulnerability but a risk that I want to mitigate.
Once it's up, go ahead, all should be well.
Great work Nefario!
Would you say that it's stable enough to launch an IPO or should a wait a bit for the kinks to be worked out?
Would you say that it's stable enough to launch an IPO or should a wait a bit for the kinks to be worked out?
My sell orders keep disappearing
New site looks awesome. Just a suggestion and it may already work this way... On the portfolio page similar to the deposit history, can you have a dividend history of dividends paid to me and by what stock? I have several stocks and it would be nice to see the most recent dividend payments on that front page.
Already does this(although dividends aren't working right now, it's going to be fixed soon), later this week or early next week I'll be importing the history from GLBSE1.0
New site looks awesome. Just a suggestion and it may already work this way... On the portfolio page similar to the deposit history, can you have a dividend history of dividends paid to me and by what stock? I have several stocks and it would be nice to see the most recent dividend payments on that front page.
Is there a way for me to change my password?
Give me a couple of days to add this functionality.
Nefario
Also GLBSE2.0 is back up, sorry about the delay.
Is there a way for me to change my password?
Looks great, when is charting going to be back up?
charts.glbse.com?
We're not getting that again, it was too pricey, we've already got some very basic charts built in, so we'll be improving and adding from there.
Nefario.
Looks great, when is charting going to be back up?
This could use a little editing for grammar, spelling and clarity.
"We do however recognised that for some users prefer for this not to be the case."
- http://glbse.com/asset/view/BTC
"We do however recognised that for some users prefer for this not to be the case."
- http://glbse.com/asset/view/BTC
Woops, I'll fix that soon.
Also on the XML contracts, we're phasing them out now, over the next week I'll be adding the ability to edit the contract (which would require a vote to allow). So, with shareholder permission you'll be able to constantly keep them up to date.
This could use a little editing for grammar, spelling and clarity.
"We do however recognised that for some users prefer for this not to be the case."
- http://glbse.com/asset/view/BTC
"We do however recognised that for some users prefer for this not to be the case."
- http://glbse.com/asset/view/BTC
Jump to: