Of course, every cryptocurrency user wants to remain anonymous and at the same time use their assets for their intended purpose, without interference from government agencies. But we must also take into account the fact that officials, as well as ordinary people, have already learned how to use cryptocurrency for their own purposes with evil intentions, and as an example we can cite tax evasion. Of course, many people are dissatisfied with taxes and blame the state for this, and also express a desire to see the state without taxes, but each of us understands that thanks to taxes there are state social guarantees and the very existence of the state. This is one of the points where you need to consider the rights of cryptocurrency users and the laws of the state.
Indeed, a memorandum of understanding must be found between the interests of the state and the interests of bitcoin users as outlined in the law.
In my opinion, cryptocurrency started by bitcoin has broken the concept of the country itself with its decentralized nature. Whereas state law aims to create a state of life that is safe, secure, prosperous, and orderly in which the legal status of each citizen is guaranteed so that harmony, balance and harmony can be achieved between individual and group interests (the community).
When talking about conflicts of interest between cryptocurrency users and countries, the answer is only because "there are alternatives". And the government does not see the urgency of the importance of taking part in the flow of cryptocurrency other than that the psychology of the government officials who lead it is still very conventional. They are worried about the interaction of digital currencies with the real economy sector, in addition to disturbing the authority of the central bank, it is also feared to disturb economic stability.
Personally, I hope that many crypto users sit in strategic political chairs so they can open the mind of the government and channel the interests of cryptocurrency users.