Hello. I had a hard time interpreting the data you left. Maybe you can help me get the data in when you have a moment.
Odd, I was pretty sure I sent you a message. Maybe I clicked on the wrong button and sent it to the trashcan instead!
The original message was
here.
What it means: first of all, I use rawIntensity instead of normal intensity or the widespread xintensity. Reason: it's just easier to understand what's going on. In theory,
2intensity == rawIntensity.
Back when that message was written there was an old kernel (v1). You can ignore it now, it was just for reference.
The (v2) column is what you care. I don't know if this is the current AMD kernel. I could retry everything if you want.
Let's see if I can make something clearer (without using btctalk broken table features)
┌-------------------------------------------------------┐
| --rawIntensity | Equivalent | h/s | Watts | Temp |
| | --intensity | | | Celsius |
├----------------+-------------+-----+--------+---------┤
| 16 | 4 | 30 | 58-106 | 44 |
| 32 | 5 | 56 | 56-105 | 48 |
| 64 | 6 | 91 | 60-105 | 50 |
| 128 | 7 | 152 | 62-109 | 50 |
| 144 | n/a | 105 | 61-107 | 49 |
└-------------------------------------------------------┘So,
my card mines at best at rawIntensity 128 (should be equivalent to intensity 7), it produces 152 hashes per second burning between 62 and 109 watts (full system load) and topping at 53C.
I reported various settings so you can see it in perspective somehow. I honestly expected some more scaling as computing 128 hashes "only" takes 256MiB of VRAM.
! After all, it was designed as a CPU coin, so this is quite normal.
