Pages:
Author

Topic: GlobalBoost-Y $BSTY GlobalBoost®, Yescrypt Social @NetworksManager™ - page 19. (Read 630492 times)

hero member
Activity: 712
Merit: 500
GPU mining has no advantage on Yescrypt as I can see. I will start mining this if I see it worthy.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Psst, don't tell anyone!  Cheesy
It's a joke cuz
bitcointalk sux!!!one!
No seriously, you can do whatever you want.

The joke originated from the fact months ago there was a lot of fuss about elite kernels which were rarely released anyway, plus some other behaviors happening pretty much only there. So I thought: what if I publish a miner for a different userbase, being different and advertising it differently. It's mildly interesting.
Aside, I don't have hardware to support core miners anyway, so maybe there will be a btctalk thread when I get to 1.0. Likely happening sometime in this decade.
:lol: intended.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1018
i like low marketcap of this coin, smooth growth, good volumes and it looks that BSTY is going to da moon (like RBY)
full member
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
Hey guys not sure if we are talking about it on this forum?  Massimo has pushed out an optimized version of GPU miner supporting GlobalBoost $BSTY Yescrypt.  Check it out.



https://GlobalBoo.st/+/David
https://twitter.com/PalmBeachHair



Alexander Peslyak (Solar Designer) has responded you can follow the conversation here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.phc/2938/focus=3496



James Porter
https://GlobalBoo.st/+/James
https://twitter.com/HardCoreAds
full member
Activity: 133
Merit: 100
Hey guys not sure if we are talking about it on this forum?  Massimo has pushed out an optimized version of GPU miner supporting GlobalBoost $BSTY Yescrypt.  Check it out.



https://GlobalBoo.st/+/David
https://twitter.com/PalmBeachHair
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Thank you Sirs!
I need more help. This is what I get by running it (added debug mode for some extra output):
Code:
>minerd -o stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3322 -u me.worker -p abcd --threads=1 --debug
[2015-10-05 18:32:26] 1 miner threads started, using 'yescrypt' algorithm.
[2015-10-05 18:32:26] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3322
[2015-10-05 18:32:26] Stratum session id: deadbeefcafebabee0ce0c0000000000
[2015-10-05 18:32:26] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1

>
AFAIK, my CPU has SSE3 (4a). This looks like some sort of memory access crash, it is not a dump due to bad instructions. But... I am  Huh
sr. member
Activity: 444
Merit: 252
I tried to download the SSE2 miner from OP. It seems MEGA removed it. Please update link!

Please update the OP.

https://mega.nz/#!2dtBQaTI!PXXZzUHRWA0rnUQWRAp9uAKvCO6222aH1IvWWikLFU8


Good morning gentlemen,
The OP is updated thanks so much.

Bruce Porter, Jr.
CEO GlobalBoost Ltd
https://GlobalBoo.st/+/auglbost
https://twitter.com/NetworksManager
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
I tried to download the SSE2 miner from OP. It seems MEGA removed it. Please update link!

Please update the OP.

https://mega.nz/#!2dtBQaTI!PXXZzUHRWA0rnUQWRAp9uAKvCO6222aH1IvWWikLFU8
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
I tried to download the SSE2 miner from OP. It seems MEGA removed it. Please update link!
full member
Activity: 133
Merit: 100
Hi guys let's spread out that hash rate.  Thanks for mining!  Cool

David Porter
Executive Director
GlobalBoost Ltd
https://GlobalBoo.st/+/David
https://twitter.com/PalmBeachHair


hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
With most hashes producing at least kilos per second I understand you hit an extra button out of habit.
I read a message some time ago from an user considering GPUs "immensely" more efficient... I was very surprised!
Good to see it has been fixed. Too bad nobody seemed to make this question.

Anyway, a couple of days ago I managed to reproduce yescrypt on GPU myself starting from the original code from Password Hashing Competition... so far it's very painful at roughly 1/3 of the hashrate. OUCH!
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.

The GPU miner has not been optimized.

I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti.  We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners.  Below is what we have so far.

Update CPU miners for old CPU's
Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great)

I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it.

Ok. Cool.  Maybe the developer that worked on it, did some updates.  Pretty sweet.  I see we about 60 miners at SuchPool right now.
I would suggest to check those values.
Suchpool currently reports network hashrate at 367 kH/s, which would imply it's one third of a single 750 ti? Not realistic at all.
P2pool nodes report estimated network hashrate ~185khs, which would imply it's one fifth of a single midrange card. Hard to believe no 750s are on p2pool.
In may 2015, crypto-mining blog reports
– Intel Core i7 5820K CPU: 5.22 KHS
– AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU: 0.793 KHS
– Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 GPU: 1.124 KHS

Hard to believe a 750ti can produce 973khs, being equivalent to 186 i7-5820k processors which are... twice as expensive?

Yeah I completely typed that wrong.  It should read 973 h/s.

hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.

The GPU miner has not been optimized.

I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti.  We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners.  Below is what we have so far.

Update CPU miners for old CPU's
Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great)

I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it.

Ok. Cool.  Maybe the developer that worked on it, did some updates.  Pretty sweet.  I see we about 60 miners at SuchPool right now.
I would suggest to check those values.
Suchpool currently reports network hashrate at 367 kH/s, which would imply it's one third of a single 750 ti? Not realistic at all.
P2pool nodes report estimated network hashrate ~185khs, which would imply it's one fifth of a single midrange card. Hard to believe no 750s are on p2pool.
In may 2015, crypto-mining blog reports
– Intel Core i7 5820K CPU: 5.22 KHS
– AMD Radeon R9 280X GPU: 0.793 KHS
– Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 GPU: 1.124 KHS

Hard to believe a 750ti can produce 973khs, being equivalent to 186 i7-5820k processors which are... twice as expensive?
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Hello.  I had a hard time interpreting the data you left.  Maybe you can help me get the data in when you have a moment.
Odd, I was pretty sure I sent you a message. Maybe I clicked on the wrong button and sent it to the trashcan instead!
The original message was here.

What it means: first of all, I use rawIntensity instead of normal intensity or the widespread xintensity. Reason: it's just easier to understand what's going on. In theory, 2intensity == rawIntensity.
Back when that message was written there was an old kernel (v1). You can ignore it now, it was just for reference.
The (v2) column is what you care. I don't know if this is the current AMD kernel. I could retry everything if you want.

Let's see if I can make something clearer (without using btctalk broken table features)

┌-------------------------------------------------------┐
| --rawIntensity | Equivalent  | h/s | Watts  | Temp    |
|                | --intensity |     |        | Celsius |
├----------------+-------------+-----+--------+---------┤
|  16            |      4      | 30  | 58-106 |   44    |
|  32            |      5      | 56  | 56-105 |   48    |
|  64            |      6      | 91  | 60-105 |   50    |
| 128            |      7      | 152 | 62-109 |   50    |
| 144            |     n/a     | 105 | 61-107 |   49    |
└-------------------------------------------------------┘


So, my card mines at best at rawIntensity 128 (should be equivalent to intensity 7), it produces 152 hashes per second burning between 62 and 109 watts (full system load) and topping at 53C.

I reported various settings so you can see it in perspective somehow. I honestly expected some more scaling as computing 128 hashes "only" takes 256MiB of VRAM.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.

The GPU miner has not been optimized.

I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti.  We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners.  Below is what we have so far.

Update CPU miners for old CPU's
Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great)

I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it.

Ok. Cool.  Maybe the developer that worked on it, did some updates.  Pretty sweet.  I see we about 60 miners at SuchPool right now.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1004
It has been a long time since I did not went to this thread. I just want to know, does the GPU miner has been optimized ? Because the last time I came it was only 2 kh/s for my GTX680.

The GPU miner has not been optimized.

I am averaging 973 kh/s on my 750ti.  We are putting together a check list of what needs to be done with the miners.  Below is what we have so far.

Update CPU miners for old CPU's
Update GPU miners for AMD and nVidia (AMD especially as the GPU hashes are not great)

I think it has been optimized, because the day one of the miner I got 2 kh/s on my GTX680, which get similar results on another algorithms. And now you get 973 kh/s on a similar card, so I should be able to have, like you, 973 kh/s. I'll try it.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Hello WigitGetIt and BSTY fans!
I was looking at the performance spreadsheet expecting to find something interesting at this point but I see very little data. There's no trace even of the numbers I provided some months ago!
How are the things going? It seems to me the quotations are decent, have you all moved to multipooling this?

Hello.  I had a hard time interpreting the data you left.  Maybe you can help me get the data in when you have a moment.

You can mine at Infernopool http://infernopool.com/getting_started with a sha256 or scyrpt miner and get paid in BSTY.  Had this up for about two months now.   Grin
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Hello WigitGetIt and BSTY fans!
I was looking at the performance spreadsheet expecting to find something interesting at this point but I see very little data. There's no trace even of the numbers I provided some months ago!
How are the things going? It seems to me the quotations are decent, have you all moved to multipooling this?
Pages:
Jump to: