Good to see you´re working together! It would be good to specify which parts of the gaming market are coveredby each of our coins to prevent us becoming competitors in the future.
I think this is good too. But, I don't really see any reason why there would have to be split communities in the first place. As far as I can tell, there WILL be overlap, and one will likely be drowned out by the other, and all the effort and time done for one coin will more-or-less be wasted. And as far as everyone else can tell, these are identical coins for the audience they're targeting. Currently, one coin has ~2.5x the market cap of the other. It could maybe change, but will it be easy to do? How many devs does GMC have?
One of the biggest drawbacks of altcoins is that most people get confused by there being too many coins. People who are not involved in crypto just want one or at most a few coins. In our case, it's a coin for the gaming community. There is no need for split efforts trying to do the same thing tbh, unless we're targeting different audiences which I don't believe is true. Why can't we just combine forces? I don't know. Once someone joins a community, it's hard to get out for various reasons.
Let's think about this for a moment: Is there a benefit to combining? Of course! And the best part is that the rewards are tremendous. Instead of going at 1x speed, why not go at 5x or some n-x speed? Let's not be blinded by what we think, but choose what's logical and best for the parties involved and, most importantly, for the gaming audience all over the world. The fact is only one gaming coin will probably survive when crypto actually starts becoming popular among the masses. I'm not sure what the plan is between GMC and HYPER, but I sure hope a good decision is made, whether it is cooperation or healthy competition.
