Topic: Godlikeprocuctions has banned the word Bitcoin! (Read 8981 times)

Yeah, thats not even an article, its a quote from the radio show which runs Sundays at 11PM eastern on www.oraclebroadcasting.com

But I have to agree with you, to some extent it is hard coded into their DNA, but the degree the media is pushing it these days is just extreme, imo. Its extremely interesting to think/talk about imo because by conditioning women's behavior you essentially control the populace, as the men will just follow women.

I'm so having that:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000932845686&sk=info (see the quotations)

Its only a theory if you cannot present substantive, duplicatable measurements.  I have found that a fair chunk of tin-foil hat wearers are just natural, untrained scientists following their basic nature.  The rest, of course are schizophrenic, CIA, or both.

That article is actually pretty good, nothing like the hilarious ramblings before.

It still fails to take in count the fact that "whoring" for material possessions, drink, food, shelter, is in the DNA for many women and not a social construction. It's been their way of surviving for millions of years because nothing else was available.

In Hollywood, people might get together and build a family because they "like" each other or have some common romantic interests.
In the real world, people most often get together and create a family if the woman thinks she has enough to benefit from the guy.

In most countries of the world, you can't even marry a woman without paying dowry to her family or proving you have enough property the woman can live off of, while you work.

Since it's not just social engineering but appears in most cultures (with the exception of islamic states with extremely strict discipline) it could be said it's very hard to "de-learn". Being truly free to choose your partner only occurs in countries with high levels of education, equal job opportunities for both genders, and a GDP high enough to put the majority of people above the poverty line.

I am the first to admit there are alot of strange conspiracy theories out there.

Like in the 1970s and early 80's, they were claiming the elite wanted to put microchips in us. They were some weird wackout out nuts werent they?  Then in the 1980's-90's we all found out how real these conspiracy chips were and they started putting them in pets and animals in the wild to track their habits. Now they are chipping the population "to protect the children". Chipping your passports, drivers licenses, and credit cards too because its more efficient and safe.  Chipping the products you buy, the books you read so they can track sales right? Or track you, and what you are reading and buying ?

I remember back in the 80's there was this crazy nutbag conspiracy about tracking all vehicles. Crazy nuts lol. Then in the 1990's federal regulations said that every car computer had to have a identical Standardized "port" installed into them for some peripheral device. Now we have EarthStream, Onstar, and global positioning devices using that port. Tons of other global positioning devices. Tracking you for your safety and security too! Or tracking where you go ? Interesting this started near about the time of the Chrystler bailout, and considering the recent auto bailouts, can we suggest that if you take government money you have to do what they tell you ?

There was once this conspiracy about the government being able to film you anywhere on the face of the earth. Spy on you. Take pictures of you. Track you. Today its known as Keyhole and Google Earth. The military has much better upgraded versions.

What about those secret CIA prisons those conspiracy theorists finally got the Washington Post to print of in 2005? ... that the Bush administration admitted to in 2006 ? From 2001 to 2006 it was all crazy conspiracies.

What about the DEA's war on drugs? The CIA's importation of drugs? The CIA's sales of those drugs to our kids to fund their black bag opperations? Yes yes more crazy conspiracies. Can we say "Iran-Contra" and "Mena, Arkansas" anyone?

The above is but a small fraction of conspiracies proven by documented fact by witnesses and from the freedom of information act. I could take days typing this shit.

The consiracy theorists were laughed at, ridiculed, and marginalized for very good reasons ... for being the crazy nutbags that they are ... then for being traitors for telling the truth ... or true partiots ... you make the call.

Uhm...a simple question, is this "godlike-thing" website really important? It's ugly, you say sometime is has virus etc etc...

If an "alternative" website like that bans it you know you're on the right track.

Prisonplanet Forum in my opinion offers the best moderation I've seen for a forum

And for those who readily snicker, laugh and ridicule those with differing views backed by sourced documentation I suggest you join the Canuck fans in trashing the joint, that's all your useful for. But that's what my smartass side says, my Gandhi / MLK side says 'That's your choice but when the time comes I'll be waiting with a story to tell'.

So people can ban Bitcoin, ridicule it... But you cannot kill an idea whose time has come. Bitcoin can never die unless we ALL do

You dont get banned for using the word bitcoin, I just walked in a made a thread with the name bitcoin and nothing but bitcoin as the text,

Ah, citing this article: http://celticrebel.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/crafty-tentacles-of-love/

Well played, sir.

I meant firmer grasp of negatively charged pink tentacles 

No idea what your talking about, but I sure you have a very... believable... explanation with no overt agenda. Didn't mean to be arrogant, just seems like a pretty far-fetched idea.

GLP is known to infect machines with viruses.  Whether it's from third party banner ads, or GLP itself, is yet to be known. 

Firmer grasp of reality? Interesting wording.

Anyways, the article you guys are referencing is really old anyways and he has moved on since then. Here is a recent example of a rant

OMFG. lol

Sometimes, I have an electromagnetically negative pink tentacle.

It makes more sense to me to call the more mobile carriers of electricity "positive", but Ben Franklin flipped a coin and called one one thing and its opposite the other.

Um, yeah, except for the fact that he didn't pull it out of nowhere, if you examine his previous works. As I said before, no one is forcing you to read this man's FREE content.


Interesting, didn't know that, thanks.

His etymology for "career" doesn't even make sense, then he starts twisting into ancient Egyptian.
He literally pulled it out of nowhere & bases another 500 lines of text on his brilliant theory.

The entire article is about how Hollywood bigshots are secretly raping men in the ass so they can become famous and make films.

And Starfish Hitler.

Strictly speaking, semen is alkaline, more electrons available, less protons.  That would make penises electromagnetically negative.