Sadly much of the reason Bitcoin isn't yet recognized as a mobile (teleportable & hide-able) store of wealth for HNWI is due to misunderstanding within the Bitcoin community itself. People advertize Bitcoin as money and as a medium of exchange and discourage "speculation" without making a distinction between short-term trading for fiat profit and safe-haven wealth protection / long-term investing.
In actual fact, given capital controls and unforseeable events that may force anyone to vacate their country of residence in a hurry (or be wrongfully arrested, etc.), a person of sufficient wealth would have to be a fool not to have a few bitcoins stashed away - assuming the person simply understood Bitcoin. In such circumstances, 5% of your wealth in a brainwallet could mean the difference between a ruined life and a temporary return to a lower standard of living.
Here's the narrative I'd like to be the common Bitcoin community wisdom, because it's true:
"Although at least one solid medium-of-exchange use may have been necessary for bitcoins to become valued when no one knew about or trusted them, with probably over a million users that train has left the station. Bitcoin's functionality as a teleportable and secret store of value is currently its most compelling use for wealthy people, since it is a highly sought-after capability (or would be if people knew such science-fiction-level thing is now possible) provided by no other asset. The consistently extraodinary year-on-year growth is just icing on the cake."
Bitcoin is the ultimate offshore account, and it happens to be experiencing incredible growth as a bonus - more than enough to offset volatility on a yearly timescale.
Good stuff. I've always been thinking that way, but figured what keeps HNWI to put money into bitcoins is mainly lack of trust and also the fact that bitcoin is not 100% secure in the sense that it could just theoretically vanish from one day to the other. Those 2 points are basically ingorable by putting just 3% or 5% and seeing it not as an investment, but more of a type of insurance in these financially and politically increasingly uncertain times. Like gold, just much more easily transportable and hidable.
We
could easily play the fear card. Even David Morgan is now openly talking about "conspiracy-type" stuff (new world order, petro-dollar, currency (and shooting) war with 2 factions: asian and west (imf, world bank, fed,..)). His goal is clearly to have his clientel hold on to gold/silver, but the same stuff should work for bitcoin just as well (maybe better because of teleportability/hidability, maybe worse because complete economic collapse could disrupt infrastructure).