Gigaboys, cue up here!
Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. - page 26. (Read 2032266 times)
This is great fun for sure!
Of course the weapon of a mod is censorship. Today was the day that the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their weapons.
Moderation is not censorship. Can't you win the argument based on facts and logic, without resorting to cheap self-pitying melodrama?
Reddit and bitcointalk are not public places where free speech applies.
I'd love to send you delicate snowflakes to a place with real censorship and watch you beg to be allowed to return to theymos' "epitome of authoritarianism."
Bitcoin is health in those places, let's hope you don't use the current centralized controlled development infrastructure to destroy it.
TIL theymos represents and speak for all "small blockers"
Sorry, you quoted my text before I changed it to "r/bitcoin mods" to be more accurate.
Doesn't change anything. You people's insistance on misrepresentating, or outright ignoring, your "enemy",their count and their resources is what may lead you to your downfall.
I expect a smart guy like you to recognize the small, yet powerful and knowledgeable minority that is above or simply don't have time for the childish arguments and posturing of reddit and the seemingly one sided debates occuring on every forums of discussion.
Reddit mob making a lot of noise doesn't make their opinion more valuable
I'm getting interested to know what planet you are living on. Is it one of those Earth II's recently found by NASA, or is it a strange alternate reality that you inhabit where economics works in reverse, and the smaller a minority is the more it can rightfully claim the moral and intellectual high ground regardless of any other opinions?
TIL theymos represents and speak for all "small blockers"
Sorry, you quoted my text before I changed it to "r/bitcoin mods" to be more accurate.
Doesn't change anything. You people's insistance on misrepresentating, or outright ignoring, your "enemy",their count and their resources is what may lead you to your downfall.
I expect a smart guy like you to recognize the small, yet powerful and knowledgeable minority that is above or simply don't have time for the childish arguments and posturing of reddit and the seemingly one sided debates occuring on every forums of discussion.
Reddit mob making a lot of noise doesn't make their opinion more valuable
[..]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
So you suggest the Elder Whales will buy up bitcoins from their stash of xtcoins? Just like a central bank would do? Well that is going to be interesting. But there is a risk of losing it all, so I would not bet that it plays out that way.
What are you smoking, crack? Elder Whales exercising their GavinCoin Short option is nothing like what central banks do. Your confused, sketchy understanding of the situation continues to surprise and baffle me with its surreal assumptions and bizarre conclusions.
So how do they defend the cripplecoin. Pitchforks?
This is one way to defend Bitcoin from XTcoin: The GavinCoin Short.
That's FTLDR.
Are you smoking crack? It's like a few paragraphs.
It's about 20 pagedowns on my screen. The word short is nowhere to be found. What do you take me for? It is an insult. Not that I care. Anyway it is UFTLDR. (Utterly fucking too long, didn't read).
I'm on an iPhone in landscape mode and the post itself is 3-4 page downs.
Since you are that persevering; found on a link on that page:
"The fate of this fork will be exactly the fate of all attempted forks to date : the savvy Bitcoin holders will sell their fake-Bitcoins on the fake network, while double-spending (and thus invalidating) their sale on the actual network, thereby keeping their actual Bitcoin safe.iv The proceeds of this "victimless"v crime will be used to purchase more legitimate Bitcoins on the legitimate network, thus draining away value from the holders of Bitcoin fakes, into the pockets of the legitimate Bitcoin holders."
How is this not selling gavincoin and buying cripplecoin?
Still the link provided had nothing but svada, the above text is from a link in the link.
txs are reflected from the original chain to the forked chain, but not necessarily vice versa so unless there is full consensus on the fork to antiquate the original chain there is risk of attack
It feels to me like a major shift occurred today.
That's probably just gas. Are you getting enough fiber in your diet?
Of course the weapon of a mod is censorship. Today was the day that the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their weapons.
Moderation is not censorship. Can't you win the argument based on facts and logic, without resorting to cheap self-pitying melodrama?
Reddit and bitcointalk are not public places where free speech applies.
I'd love to send you delicate snowflakes to a place with real censorship and watch you beg to be allowed to return to theymos' "epitome of authoritarianism."
TIL theymos represents and speak for all "small blockers"
Sorry, you quoted my text before I changed it to "r/bitcoin mods" to be more accurate.
Doesn't change anything. You people's insistance on misrepresentating, or outright ignoring, your "enemy",their count and their resources is what may lead you to your downfall.
I expect a smart guy like you to recognize the small, yet powerful and knowledgeable minority that is above or simply don't have time for the childish arguments and posturing of reddit and the seemingly one sided debates occuring on every forums of discussion.
Reddit mob making a lot of noise doesn't make their opinion more valuable
TIL theymos represents and speak for all "small blockers"
Sorry, you quoted my text before I changed it to "r/bitcoin mods" to be more accurate.
It feels to me like a major shift occurred today. It was caused in part by Gavin and Mike completing the patch to support larger block sizes, but I think it was actually caused more so by a foolish move made on the battlefield. In an act of desperation, the small blockers threw their swords.
What do I mean by "throwing one's sword?" I'll have to explain it with a story about my childhood…
...The town I grew up in (about an hour outside of Vancouver) seemed perfectly normal to me as a kid, but when I look back now, it was actually pretty rough. It was home to hundreds of Hell's Angels and it served as a sort of distribution center in the drug trade.
Anyways, there were lots of fights between groups of boys when I was growing up. I was never really a part of it, but I was fascinated and paid attention to the dynamics of the process. One strange behaviour I witnessed was that the last act of the losing faction of boys was always to throw their weapons. It was such a stupid thing to do, because the baseball bat or hockey stick would rarely hit the intended target, and in the few times that it did, it would be travelling at such a reduced velocity that the impact imparted to the victim was superficial at best.
And then the weaponless boys would get their butts kicked.
It turns out that this is a sort of a natural human reaction to severe stress. As a last resort, we throw whatever we have left and hope for the best. In the movies, it always works; in real life, the opposite is true.
Of course the weapon of a mod is censorship. Today was the day that the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their weapons.
What do I mean by "throwing one's sword?" I'll have to explain it with a story about my childhood…
...The town I grew up in (about an hour outside of Vancouver) seemed perfectly normal to me as a kid, but when I look back now, it was actually pretty rough. It was home to hundreds of Hell's Angels and it served as a sort of distribution center in the drug trade.
Anyways, there were lots of fights between groups of boys when I was growing up. I was never really a part of it, but I was fascinated and paid attention to the dynamics of the process. One strange behaviour I witnessed was that the last act of the losing faction of boys was always to throw their weapons. It was such a stupid thing to do, because the baseball bat or hockey stick would rarely hit the intended target, and in the few times that it did, it would be travelling at such a reduced velocity that the impact imparted to the victim was superficial at best.
And then the weaponless boys would get their butts kicked.
It turns out that this is a sort of a natural human reaction to severe stress. As a last resort, we throw whatever we have left and hope for the best. In the movies, it always works; in real life, the opposite is true.
Of course the weapon of a mod is censorship. Today was the day that the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their weapons.
TIL theymos represents and speak for all "small blockers"
Meanwhile you can have a look here at the reaction of actual "small blockers" : http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/
hint : not a care in the world
[..]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
So you suggest the Elder Whales will buy up bitcoins from their stash of xtcoins? Just like a central bank would do? Well that is going to be interesting. But there is a risk of losing it all, so I would not bet that it plays out that way.
What are you smoking, crack? Elder Whales exercising their GavinCoin Short option is nothing like what central banks do. Your confused, sketchy understanding of the situation continues to surprise and baffle me with its surreal assumptions and bizarre conclusions.
So how do they defend the cripplecoin. Pitchforks?
This is one way to defend Bitcoin from XTcoin: The GavinCoin Short.
That's FTLDR.
Are you smoking crack? It's like a few paragraphs.
It's about 20 pagedowns on my screen. The word short is nowhere to be found. What do you take me for? It is an insult. Not that I care. Anyway it is UFTLDR. (Utterly fucking too long, didn't read).
I'm on an iPhone in landscape mode and the post itself is 3-4 page downs.
Since you are that persevering; found on a link on that page:
"The fate of this fork will be exactly the fate of all attempted forks to date : the savvy Bitcoin holders will sell their fake-Bitcoins on the fake network, while double-spending (and thus invalidating) their sale on the actual network, thereby keeping their actual Bitcoin safe.iv The proceeds of this "victimless"v crime will be used to purchase more legitimate Bitcoins on the legitimate network, thus draining away value from the holders of Bitcoin fakes, into the pockets of the legitimate Bitcoin holders."
How is this not selling gavincoin and buying cripplecoin?
Still the link provided had nothing but svada, the above text is from a link in the link.
It feels to me like a major shift occurred today. It was caused in part by Gavin and Mike completing the patch to support larger block sizes, but I think it was actually caused more so by a foolish move made on the battlefield-that-was-reddit today. In an act of desperation, the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their swords.
What do I mean by "throwing one's sword?" I'll have to explain it with a story about my childhood…
...The town I grew up in (about an hour outside of Vancouver) seemed perfectly normal to me as a kid, but when I look back now, it was actually pretty rough. It was home to hundreds of Hell's Angels and it served as a sort of distribution center in the drug trade.
Anyways, there were lots of fights between groups of boys when I was growing up. I was never really a part of it, but I was fascinated and paid attention to the dynamics of the process. One strange behaviour I witnessed was that the last act of the losing faction of boys was always to throw their weapons. It was such a stupid thing to do, because the baseball bat or hockey stick would rarely hit the intended target, and in the few times that it did, it would be travelling at such a reduced velocity that the impact imparted to the victim was superficial at best.
And then the weaponless boys would get their butts kicked.
It turns out that this is a sort of a natural human reaction to severe stress. As a last resort, we throw whatever we have left and hope for the best. In the movies, it always works; in real life, the opposite is true.
Of course the weapon of a mod is censorship. Today was the day that the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their weapons.
What do I mean by "throwing one's sword?" I'll have to explain it with a story about my childhood…
...The town I grew up in (about an hour outside of Vancouver) seemed perfectly normal to me as a kid, but when I look back now, it was actually pretty rough. It was home to hundreds of Hell's Angels and it served as a sort of distribution center in the drug trade.
Anyways, there were lots of fights between groups of boys when I was growing up. I was never really a part of it, but I was fascinated and paid attention to the dynamics of the process. One strange behaviour I witnessed was that the last act of the losing faction of boys was always to throw their weapons. It was such a stupid thing to do, because the baseball bat or hockey stick would rarely hit the intended target, and in the few times that it did, it would be travelling at such a reduced velocity that the impact imparted to the victim was superficial at best.
And then the weaponless boys would get their butts kicked.
It turns out that this is a sort of a natural human reaction to severe stress. As a last resort, we throw whatever we have left and hope for the best. In the movies, it always works; in real life, the opposite is true.
Of course the weapon of a mod is censorship. Today was the day that the mods at /r/bitcoin threw their weapons.
Ken Friece bitcoin-dev:
What are you so afraid of, Eric? If Mike's fork is successful, consensus is reached around larger blocks. If it is rejected, the status quo will remain for now. Network consensus, NOT CORE DEVELOPER CONSENSUS, is the only thing that matters, and those that go against network consensus will be severely punished with complete loss of income.
I'm not sure who appointed the core devs some sort of Bitcoin Gods that can hold up any change that they happen to disagree with. It seems like the core devs are scared to death that the bitcoin network may change without their blessing, so they go on and on about how terrible hard forks are. Hard forks are the only way to keep core devs in check.
Despite significant past technical bitcoin achievements, two of the most vocal opponents to a reasonable blocksize increase work for a company (Blockstream) that stands to profit directly from artificially limiting the blocksize. The whole situation reeks. Because of such a blatant conflict of interest, the ethical thing to do would be for them to either resign from Blockstream or immediately withdraw themselves from the blocksize debate. This is the type of stuff that I hoped would end with Bitcoin, but alas, I guess human nature never changes.
Personally, I think miners should give Bitcoin XT a serious look. Miners need to realize that they are in direct competition with the lightning network and sidechains for fees. Miners, ask yourselves if you think you'll earn more fees with 1 MB blocks and more off-chain transactions or with 8 MB blocks and more on-chain transactions...
The longer this debate drags on, the more I agree with BIP 100 and Jeff Garzik because the core devs are already being influenced by outside forces and should not have complete control of the blocksize. It's also interesting to note that most of the mining hashpower is already voting for 8MB blocks BIP100 style.
What are you so afraid of, Eric? If Mike's fork is successful, consensus is reached around larger blocks. If it is rejected, the status quo will remain for now. Network consensus, NOT CORE DEVELOPER CONSENSUS, is the only thing that matters, and those that go against network consensus will be severely punished with complete loss of income.
I'm not sure who appointed the core devs some sort of Bitcoin Gods that can hold up any change that they happen to disagree with. It seems like the core devs are scared to death that the bitcoin network may change without their blessing, so they go on and on about how terrible hard forks are. Hard forks are the only way to keep core devs in check.
Despite significant past technical bitcoin achievements, two of the most vocal opponents to a reasonable blocksize increase work for a company (Blockstream) that stands to profit directly from artificially limiting the blocksize. The whole situation reeks. Because of such a blatant conflict of interest, the ethical thing to do would be for them to either resign from Blockstream or immediately withdraw themselves from the blocksize debate. This is the type of stuff that I hoped would end with Bitcoin, but alas, I guess human nature never changes.
Personally, I think miners should give Bitcoin XT a serious look. Miners need to realize that they are in direct competition with the lightning network and sidechains for fees. Miners, ask yourselves if you think you'll earn more fees with 1 MB blocks and more off-chain transactions or with 8 MB blocks and more on-chain transactions...
The longer this debate drags on, the more I agree with BIP 100 and Jeff Garzik because the core devs are already being influenced by outside forces and should not have complete control of the blocksize. It's also interesting to note that most of the mining hashpower is already voting for 8MB blocks BIP100 style.
1. LN - it is not a protocol change. It was (and ever will be) possible to use LN. It is win-win b/c
a) it saves network resources
b) it brings more anonymity
2. SC - it does not move transaction fees to Blockstream. Same miners who lose fees from MC can earn this fees from SC. It is again win-win strategy
a) miners can earn fees by mining more chains
b) those who are not interested in mining bloat-chain are not forced to keep all the world transactions forever.
That's definitely an English first language response. ;-)
Your understanding is only true if you can prevent the bugs that exist in Bitcoin from being fixed. If a fork like XT is possible then you loose the ability to lock the code needed to make LN and SC possible. The idea of the underlying protocol being subject to change is a threat to your dear project.
Shame on you holding us hostage.
The real Satoshi has never signed anything.
Can more people corroborate this? I am not familiar with his public history too much.
That writing is not Satoshi it lack understand of how Bitcoin works. If anything Satoshi would just clarify how he though his imposed limit should be dealt with.
You seem so sure.
In any case, I think the messenger supported the block increase if and only if full consensus for such a fork was achieved meritoriously.
I'm confidant with the information I have, my mine is flexible on the subject. If there is information I don't have the people supporting limiting the block size should present it.
This Satoshi email dose not reflect an understanding of the issue being debated.
I'm happy to hear.
Well, to me, personally, the issue the past recent while is not concerning the block size fork but rather the manner of implementing such a fork.
XT nodes moving up quickly.
despite a tighter chart filter measuring ONLY hard bigger block acceptance via 0.11A which knocked down the # measured nodes earlier this morning from 207 --> 80'ish, by this afternoon the # is back up to 206 currently.
despite a tighter chart filter measuring ONLY hard bigger block acceptance via 0.11A which knocked down the # measured nodes earlier this morning from 207 --> 80'ish, by this afternoon the # is back up to 206 currently.
206, that's winning. The cripplecoiners had better declare unconditional surrender.
[..]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
So you suggest the Elder Whales will buy up bitcoins from their stash of xtcoins? Just like a central bank would do? Well that is going to be interesting. But there is a risk of losing it all, so I would not bet that it plays out that way.
What are you smoking, crack? Elder Whales exercising their GavinCoin Short option is nothing like what central banks do. Your confused, sketchy understanding of the situation continues to surprise and baffle me with its surreal assumptions and bizarre conclusions.
So how do they defend the cripplecoin. Pitchforks?
This is one way to defend Bitcoin from XTcoin: The GavinCoin Short.
That's FTLDR.
Are you smoking crack? It's like a few paragraphs.
It's about 20 pagedowns on my screen. The word short is nowhere to be found. What do you take me for? It is an insult. Not that I care. Anyway it is UFTLDR. (Utterly fucking too long, didn't read).
I'm on an iPhone in landscape mode and the post itself is 3-4 page downs.
The real Satoshi has never signed anything.
Can more people corroborate this? I am not familiar with his public history too much.
That writing is not Satoshi it lack understand of how Bitcoin works. If anything Satoshi would just clarify how he though his imposed limit should be dealt with.
You seem so sure.
In any case, I think the messenger supported the block increase if and only if full consensus for such a fork was achieved meritoriously.
I'm confidant with the information I have, my mind is flexible on the subject. If there is information I don't have, the people supporting limiting the block size should present it.
This Satoshi email dose not reflect an understanding of the issue being debated.
Big middle finger to iCEBLOW, brg444, tvbcof, and MOA:
You know I couldn't wait for this one heh
Market reaction to XT fork
Revenge is a dish best served "iCEBLOW" cold.
#REKT
The "populism of the 1MBers" is not your concern.
Your concern is the multi-year duration and multi-billion-dollar magnitude of Bitcoin's current economic majority.
Are you going to be the first brave fellow to defect from that imposing majority by accepting Gavin-tainted XTcoins? No? Then you are just a poser.
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
Are you still sure you want to risk your tiny stash playing Hard Fork Poker with such ultra-high-rollers?
Before you answer, please take into account that nodes by default prioritize tx moving older coins, and the Royalty of La Serenissima possesses, in great quantities, very old coins.
What will you do when the limit isn't raised within the next 12 months? Continue to cry wolf? Self harm? Or admit being wrong?
Your concern is the multi-year duration and multi-billion-dollar magnitude of Bitcoin's current economic majority.
Are you going to be the first brave fellow to defect from that imposing majority by accepting Gavin-tainted XTcoins? No? Then you are just a poser.
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
Are you still sure you want to risk your tiny stash playing Hard Fork Poker with such ultra-high-rollers?
Before you answer, please take into account that nodes by default prioritize tx moving older coins, and the Royalty of La Serenissima possesses, in great quantities, very old coins.
What will you do when the limit isn't raised within the next 12 months? Continue to cry wolf? Self harm? Or admit being wrong?
You know iCE, I also am concerned by the idea of a hostile fork, but reading your propaganda it just dawned on me that the only hostilities are coming from people like you. Everyone of any worth agrees we need to increase the block size, it's just there is a hostile minority who feel they are in power who are wanting to pick a fight.
Accommodating bigger blocks over a 12 month period given Bitcoin's exponential growth is not a hostile act, it's not rushing in a controversial change, it's a practical prudent approach.
You are part of the minority who are making it controversial and calling it hostile. I just don't see why you're opposed to letting Bitcoin grow free of manipulation and control.
I am only describing the battlefield and war gaming possible outcomes. Those purely verbal speculative actions are not "hostilities."
This is what "a hostile minority who feel they are in power who are wanting to pick a fight" actually looks like:
https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1
Anyway please spread the word, we need to orphan those cripplecoiners blocks as soon as possible, that's how the protocol works. If you feel I overlook something here excluding Gmax and Back's ego, please explain how and why you feel this is hostile?
[..]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
In the remote possiblity XT becomes a matter of more importance than the hype, mirth, and scorn it generates at present, MPex and other 1MBer Elder Whales are prepared to use substantial (possibly exhaustive) portions of their extraordinarily massive war chests to repel 8MBer attacks. To them, this is Holy War, with barbarian Gavinista hordes clamouring for a Free Shit Junta at the gates of their bespoke civilization. They are more of a mood to impale heads atop spikes than reward with compromise Hearn's attacks on decentralization, Tor, and the consensus process.
[...]
So you suggest the Elder Whales will buy up bitcoins from their stash of xtcoins? Just like a central bank would do? Well that is going to be interesting. But there is a risk of losing it all, so I would not bet that it plays out that way.
What are you smoking, crack? Elder Whales exercising their GavinCoin Short option is nothing like what central banks do. Your confused, sketchy understanding of the situation continues to surprise and baffle me with its surreal assumptions and bizarre conclusions.
So how do they defend the cripplecoin. Pitchforks?
This is one way to defend Bitcoin from XTcoin: The GavinCoin Short.
That's FTLDR.
Are you smoking crack? It's like a few paragraphs.
It's about 20 pagedowns on my screen. The word short is nowhere to be found. What do you take me for? It is an insult. Not that I care. Anyway it is UFTLDR. (Utterly fucking too long, didn't read).
Jump to: