Gold is valuable because everyone agrees that it is valuable. And because it has been valuable through all of recorded history, the consensus is that it will retain that value for the future. That's it. There's nothing intrinsic to gold itself that makes it valuable, it's just the consensus. Many other things are stores of value, despite having no intrinsic worth. Fine art, for example. People don't buy a Van Gogh because it's a good painting, but because it's a good investment.
So is Bitcoin a better store of value than gold? Well the answer is that it depends on what people want to do with a store of value item. If all they want to do is lock it in a vault, then gold is probably good enough. But if they actually want to use it, to transfer it, and to be 100% confident in the maximum possible supply, then Bitcoin is far far superior. All that remains, however difficult that might be, is for this to become the consensus opinion.
This is false, and a lot of misinformation is your post. You say gold has no intrinsic value, this is false. Gold is the best conductor of electricity and to proof it has intrinsic value let me show you something.
Fiat also has intrinsic value, since when it go's to zero you can use it to keep you warm at night or use it to wipe your ass. Thus at zero you can extract value which is it's intrinsic value.
Gold at Zero you can use it's electricity conducting properties or wear it as jewelry or store it for hundreds of years and its properties will never change. This is intrinsic value because at zero I can still extract value from it!
Digital fiat ( AKA Bitcoin) at zero has no intrinsic value because at zero you won't be able to do anything with it, so digital fiat has less intrinsic value than fiat!.
Don't be fooled by these clowns people, they lack common sense and logic!