Gold has security issues too - page 2.

Jaime Frontero

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: alkhdaniel on July 07, 2011, 01:58:10 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:13:14 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 07, 2011, 12:10:31 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:06:49 AM

you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

how many private keys can you get on one? Wink

i dunno. it would depend on how much redundancy you felt was adequate.

an LP holds as much music as a CD though - right? so a few hundred meg, less the data cost of analog>digital translation.

It's analog, there is 0 bytes on it.

edit:
and it would be much cheaper to store everything on paper and scan it instead, MUCH cheaper.

yes, it's analog and has 0 bytes - but an analog signal which is designed to be converted to digital can carry information. as i pointed out - USB turntables are interesting, and do precisely that. the trick is to design a way to convert a digital piece of information to an analog signal that can easily be converted back. i've imagined playing a Word Doc using one's favorite CD player...

alkhdaniel

member

Activity: 114

Merit: 10

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:13:14 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 07, 2011, 12:10:31 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:06:49 AM

you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

how many private keys can you get on one? Wink

i dunno. it would depend on how much redundancy you felt was adequate.

an LP holds as much music as a CD though - right? so a few hundred meg, less the data cost of analog>digital translation.

It's analog, there is 0 bytes on it.

edit:
and it would be much cheaper to store everything on paper and scan it instead, MUCH cheaper.

Jaime Frontero

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 07, 2011, 12:29:15 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:13:14 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 07, 2011, 12:10:31 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:06:49 AM

you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

how many private keys can you get on one? Wink

i dunno. it would depend on how much redundancy you felt was adequate.

an LP holds as much music as a CD though - right? so a few hundred meg, less the data cost of analog>digital translation.

maybe you ought to start a btc storage service

i thought of doing that. just too many irons in the fire right now.

the idea is free to whoever wants it...

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:13:14 AM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 07, 2011, 12:10:31 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:06:49 AM

you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

how many private keys can you get on one? Wink

i dunno. it would depend on how much redundancy you felt was adequate.

an LP holds as much music as a CD though - right? so a few hundred meg, less the data cost of analog>digital translation.

maybe you ought to start a btc storage service

Jaime Frontero

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 07, 2011, 12:10:31 AM

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:06:49 AM

you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

how many private keys can you get on one? Wink

i dunno. it would depend on how much redundancy you felt was adequate.

an LP holds as much music as a CD though - right? so a few hundred meg, less the data cost of analog>digital translation.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 07, 2011, 12:06:49 AM

you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

how many private keys can you get on one? Wink

Jaime Frontero

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 11:44:38 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 11:27:30 PM

is there a known "average lifespan" of solid state digital storage media?

Maybe, but it means nothing because different products will have different characteristics.

Non standard formats are a major problem for long term data storage. You can see this happen with the formats of the most popular word processor of a couple of years ago. Files in plain text, HTML, gzip, bzip2 are as readable now as they were when they were written. Be sure to use a simple format for your wallet and bundle it's specification together unless you plan to update it with every format change of your favorite Bitcoin implementation. That's my advice.

Regards.

as i pointed out on an old thread, once - the longest term storage medium we have yet devised is the LP vinyl record. not counting chiseled rock, of course. you can get a custom LP cut (the actual machinery is fairly expensive) by a service, for about 50 USD.

the trick is to get digital information onto and off of an analog medium without any degradation at all. those USB record-players look interesting, don't they?

DamienBlack

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 1

Quote from: Jaime Frontero on July 06, 2011, 11:59:10 PM

agreed - except i think you're an optimist. i give gold and silver less than 100 years as a store of wealth. nope, there's no long-term future in gold.

hell, there's roughly 25 tons of the stuff in every cubic mile of seawater (concentration varies by location), and almost twice that of silver; according to the USGS:

http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/whyoceansalty.html

humans have always been pretty good at extracting things from other things - and sooner or later, seawater will be cracked as well. there's been folks working on it for quite a while. sooner or later...

Well then, all we need is a big water magnet. I'm going to be rich, lol. Very good points, in a cage match between bitcoins and gold for the long term... I don't know, hard to call. If bitcoins are still around in 2 year, I know who I believe would win. It just needs to make it through these first few years.

Jaime Frontero

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: DamienBlack on July 06, 2011, 10:56:22 PM

Quote from: NO_SLAVE on July 06, 2011, 10:51:33 PM

I really dont see BTC being around in 5,000-10,000-25,000-2 million years. Do you?

Gold will be laying or being worn somewhere.

I'm not sure I even believe humans will be around 2 million years from now. All that matters to me is the next 20-50 years. This guy isn't trying to pass on the wealth to his descendants 5,000 years in the future.

In 5,000 year, I expect gold will be a by-product of our cold-fusion reactors. There'll be more of it than we know what to do with. There will be landfills full of the stuff.

If gold has any value in the distant future, it will be manufactured. Completely silly to think gold is a good store of value for the next 25,000-2,000,000 years.

agreed - except i think you're an optimist. i give gold and silver less than 100 years as a store of wealth. nope, there's no long-term future in gold.

hell, there's roughly 25 tons of the stuff in every cubic mile of seawater (concentration varies by location), and almost twice that of silver; according to the USGS:

http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/whyoceansalty.html

humans have always been pretty good at extracting things from other things - and sooner or later, seawater will be cracked as well. there's been folks working on it for quite a while. sooner or later...

ampkZjWDQcqT

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

GNU is not UNIX

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 11:27:30 PM

is there a known "average lifespan" of solid state digital storage media?

Maybe, but it means nothing because different products will have different characteristics.

Non standard formats are a major problem for long term data storage. You can see this happen with the formats of the most popular word processor of a couple of years ago. Files in plain text, HTML, gzip, bzip2 are as readable now as they were when they were written. Be sure to use a simple format for your wallet and bundle it's specification together unless you plan to update it with every format change of your favorite Bitcoin implementation. That's my advice.

Regards.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: MikesMechanix on July 06, 2011, 11:27:30 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:07:06 PM

when leaving on vacations with my family like we will be doing for a week this coming Friday, i would always worry in the back of my mind that my house might get burglarized.

Well, now you'll be checking Mt.Gox every 5 minutes to see if Satoshi decided to dump all his coins at once. Good luck. Grin

as in now i check the Comex?

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: MikesMechanix on July 06, 2011, 11:27:30 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:07:06 PM

when leaving on vacations with my family like we will be doing for a week this coming Friday, i would always worry in the back of my mind that my house might get burglarized.

Well, now you'll be checking Mt.Gox every 5 minutes to see if Satoshi decided to dump all his coins at once. Good luck. Grin

granted i'm a speculator. i've had a multi-fold return on the PM's and i just happen to think they're topping. could be wrong. but btc fits my criteria for a stable, usable, modern era currency that has lots of room to grow. the merchant growth is exciting and those 2 Android apps that just came out have convinced me to sell the last remaining stores of my bullion.

the offline wallet though has REALLY relieved alot of the anxiety over btc security.

i'm not worried about the price of btc as i think the price is just getting started...

ampkZjWDQcqT

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

GNU is not UNIX

Quote from: DamienBlack on July 06, 2011, 10:56:22 PM

In 5,000 year, I expect gold will be a by-product of our cold-fusion reactors. There'll be more of it than we know what to do with. There will be landfills full of the stuff.

Gold is currently being produced as a by-product of nuclear fission, albeit in a tiny ratio, along with more expensive elements. However I don't know if it's profitable for reprocessing facilities to extract it from used fuel or whether they're actually extracting the expensive elements other than ¹³⁷Cs. You might want to research further, it's interesting.

P.S: Simplicity and/or standardization and the key for information preservation along lifetimes. It's clear to see paper backup archives both. If I were to use paper backup I would store it together with a written english and spanish (My native languaje) description of it's format and the decodification process.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: MoonShadow on July 06, 2011, 11:24:30 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 11:18:06 PM

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 11:12:01 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:42:56 PM

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 10:31:47 PM

I would rather have encrypted the wallet with GNU PG and stored it in paper or optical disk.

please elaborate.

Sure.

Regarding GNU PG, a quote from it's official site: "GnuPG is the GNU project's complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC4880" (Links added). You can use GNU PG to encrypt the wallet. I suggest diceware for the password. You can dump the encrypted file to a CD or paper with PaperBack or similar. If you opt for this, remember to make sure the wallet don't gets into hard disk. There is no need to use a Live CD, if you use GNU/Linux (I suggest you do) just create a new user with the proper umask and /home in a tmpfs mount.

The point is to avoid banks or any other third party. Free feel to ask if you need more information in some point.

i certainly respect your opinion on this and you're not the only one who feels this is the way to go. but why is it better than using an encrypted IronKey with LiveCD?

Perhaps it's not, but archival storage of paper, under the right conditions, is known to have an indefinate lifespan. This is not known to be true with regard to solid state digital storage (as in the ironkey) and is already known to not be true with regard to optical disks.

is there a known "average lifespan" of solid state digital storage media?

MikesMechanix

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:07:06 PM

when leaving on vacations with my family like we will be doing for a week this coming Friday, i would always worry in the back of my mind that my house might get burglarized.

Well, now you'll be checking Mt.Gox every 5 minutes to see if Satoshi decided to dump all his coins at once. Good luck. Grin

MoonShadow

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1010

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 11:18:06 PM

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 11:12:01 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:42:56 PM

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 10:31:47 PM

I would rather have encrypted the wallet with GNU PG and stored it in paper or optical disk.

please elaborate.

Sure.

Regarding GNU PG, a quote from it's official site: "GnuPG is the GNU project's complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC4880" (Links added). You can use GNU PG to encrypt the wallet. I suggest diceware for the password. You can dump the encrypted file to a CD or paper with PaperBack or similar. If you opt for this, remember to make sure the wallet don't gets into hard disk. There is no need to use a Live CD, if you use GNU/Linux (I suggest you do) just create a new user with the proper umask and /home in a tmpfs mount.

The point is to avoid banks or any other third party. Free feel to ask if you need more information in some point.

i certainly respect your opinion on this and you're not the only one who feels this is the way to go. but why is it better than using an encrypted IronKey with LiveCD?

Perhaps it's not, but archival storage of paper, under the right conditions, is known to have an indefinate lifespan. This is not known to be true with regard to solid state digital storage (as in the ironkey) and is already known to not be true with regard to optical disks.

CurbsideProphet

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 11:07:33 PM

%

Quote from: CurbsideProphet on July 06, 2011, 10:55:21 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:07:06 PM

as a gold/silver bug since 2005, i have finally sold off 98% of my bullion holdings and moved it into bitcoin.

I hope your bullion was only a small percentage of your investment portfolio. If not putting 98% into anything, let alone something in its infancy, is a major gamble. I hope you don't have any dependents. The last thing I would want to see is someone getting wiped out so I wish you the best of luck but yikes....

i said 98% OF MY BULLION.

Which is why I said I hope your bullion is only a small percent of your total portfolio......

I'm assuming by your reply it is.

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 11:12:01 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:42:56 PM

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 10:31:47 PM

I would rather have encrypted the wallet with GNU PG and stored it in paper or optical disk.

please elaborate.

Sure.

Regarding GNU PG, a quote from it's official site: "GnuPG is the GNU project's complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC4880" (Links added). You can use GNU PG to encrypt the wallet. I suggest diceware for the password. You can dump the encrypted file to a CD or paper with PaperBack or similar. If you opt for this, remember to make sure the wallet don't gets into hard disk. There is no need to use a Live CD, if you use GNU/Linux (I suggest you do) just create a new user with the proper umask and /home in a tmpfs mount.

The point is to avoid banks or any other third party. Free feel to ask if you need more information in some point.

i certainly respect your opinion on this and you're not the only one who feels this is the way to go. but why is it better than using an encrypted IronKey with LiveCD?

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: NO_SLAVE on July 06, 2011, 10:51:33 PM

I really dont see BTC being around in 5,000-10,000-25,000-2 million years. Do you?

Gold will be laying ,or being worn, somewhere.

Bitcoin is for big thinkers.

ampkZjWDQcqT

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

GNU is not UNIX

Quote from: cypherdoc on July 06, 2011, 10:42:56 PM

Quote from: ampkZjWDQcqT on July 06, 2011, 10:31:47 PM

I would rather have encrypted the wallet with GNU PG and stored it in paper or optical disk.

please elaborate.

Sure.

Regarding GNU PG, a quote from it's official site: "GnuPG is the GNU project's complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC4880" (Links added). You can use GNU PG to encrypt the wallet. I suggest diceware for the password. You can dump the encrypted file to a CD or paper with PaperBack or similar. If you opt for this, remember to make sure the wallet don't gets into hard disk. There is no need to use a Live CD, if you use GNU/Linux (I suggest you do) just create a new user with the proper umask and /home in a tmpfs mount.

The point is to avoid banks or any other third party. Free feel to ask if you need more information in some point.

Topic: Gold has security issues too - page 2. (Read 4228 times)