No, but thanks for the offer. I'm not interested in gambling with Bitcoin against gold or vice versa, especially not short term - there's way too much potential volatility coming. I prefer sure things that are easy to predict, like Bitcoin and gold against fiat over the next several years.
If I were to use either asset now, it'd be to nibble at insanely cheap productive resources - when everyone's a gambler, don't gamble.
Whatever that would be in fiat would be irrelevant at this point. But that gonna take a long time.
you might be underestimating BTC itself (value increase not caused by fiat inflation but bitcoin economy/investment growth)... or are you talking 2012-based BTC when you say 50 btc/oz?
@miscreanity: thanks for above charts and elaboration.
Sure thing.
I think we'll see an inverted XAU:BTC ratio. Maybe even 5:1 or better. Going with the extreme of 5.5 billion troy ounces of gold to the maximum Bitcoin supply of 21mm, the ration would be about 261:1. Silver has an estimated supply in the tens of billions of ounces, and that's historically held fairly accurate in valuation relative to gold, so I'm probably being conservative with Bitcoin.
Agreed about 2008. Gold remains buried in background noise for most people, like Bitcoin has been after the initial over-enthusiastic interest fell. What if both trends rise?