Topic: Good bounty manager. - page 8. (Read 6357 times)
I've joined a bounty managed by momopi. So far so good, I was satisfied by his work that updated its spreadsheet everyweek on schedule. He is part of AmaziX team that also manages Telegram groups for ICOs.
Thanks for the compilation mate they are all trusted managers so far and I got no problems whenever I participated especially yahoo, sylon, needmoney, and atriz I will also try some trusted on the list its a good reference to others to select a good campaigns.
Greetiings ,
I am the founder of Yaahub Exchange and i am looking for suitable Bounty Manager
The link will explain the profile of the Bounty manager requirement https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4603453.new#new
I am the founder of Yaahub Exchange and i am looking for suitable Bounty Manager
The link will explain the profile of the Bounty manager requirement https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4603453.new#new
I think this is a problem, Of course they should hire good and nice bounty managers famous and fast updated by stakes. Like TokenSuite, Sylon, Needmoney. To become more famous and know their ICO immediately.
I have just recently completed a full bounty program. Its a lot, lot, lot harder than you can actually imagine.
I always appreciate the work of Sylon, he is a very responsible manager! I recommend his bounty profit will be accurate.
Guys, is there any update on Amazix? As far as i know, they have changed the whole vision of bounty campaings.
What should we expect next?
Here is a FAQ page containing latest amazix changes. Read that now. They are moving more on a quality side.What should we expect next?
https://medium.com/amazix/amazix-community-rewards-your-questions-answered-31f02203ad0e
Fuck 'em https://medium.com/@pmdmaritz/with-all-respect-dont-underestimate-our-intelligence-we-are-in-cryptos-for-a-reason-2eddf6e36ad0
Quote
With all due respect, don’t underestimate our intelligence — we are in cryptos for a reason. Let me speak for those who are too scared to give you a piece of their minds for fear of negative consequences…
I am sure that beyond the claps received by those who didn’t even bother to read, most bounty hunters will take this announcement of yours as a big F YOU in return for all the hard work done — and most importantly, after months of loyalty built up towards the AmaZix brand.
You wrote: “ All bounty programs will now be called Community Rewards.”
My response: It is an insult to call it Community Rewards. Given that your focus will in the future only be on invite-only VIPs, you should call it Invite-Only VIP Rewards. As for us — bounty hunters at large in the crypto community — we will continue to call what we participate in, bounty programs. Nobody is going to change that and especially not at our expense.
You wrote: “ Rewards cannot be established as a function of raised funds. Essentially, this means that participants can no longer be rewarded based on or dependent on the money raised during a crowdfund, token sale or coin offering, as this would be perceived as participants being “on a commission”.
As such, reward allocations will need to be a fixed amount that is affordable for the partner, regardless of crowdfund performance.”
My response: What is the fixed amount called then, a salary or wage- and how is it better than commission — something that is earned in most affiliate programs (without the need for KYC)? By removing an increased reward from crowdfund performance, you’re going to completely destroy the incentive to perform — for those VIPs fortunate enough to be invited. Not even to mention the rest of us that will not even have the opportunity to participate.
You wrote: “ Participation in content creation will now be by invitation only. Most social networks, including Twitter and Facebook, have updated their Terms and Conditions so that it is no longer permissible to promote a business from a private or personal profile. In addition, both these platforms have banned paid advertising for ICOs. Hence, social media can not be used to participate in Community Rewards.”
“ Participation in content creation will now be by invitation only.”
My response: In other words, you’re telling 99.9% of those who supported you since the beginning that their contributions are of little value. This while you achieved network effect through the great number of participants — something that led to many successful ICOs.
Yes, they are banning paid advertising for ICOs in terms of twitter ads, but we are still allowed to tweet about ICOs and pretty much anything we like that is not offensive and/or constituted hate speech. You are just using it as an excuse to screw over the little guy, because without us in the picture — you and the invite-only VIP big boys get to earn more!
Cryptos were never about sucking up to so called VIPs and centralized authorities. Cryptos were born to bring as much benefit to humanity as possible. For once people can benefit— regardless of their race, religious affiliations, sexual preference and more. Yet, you now suddenly stand by those who want the exact opposite. Shame on you!
I am sickened by this turn of events. And I am sure many bounty hunters will agree with me. If you have your way, I bet all ICOs will pretty soon turn into IPOs run by the big boys on Wall Street! Then it will be rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat while the little guy has to bend over! And to think cryptos were supposed to change all of that! Yeah, let’s make it more centralized — invite-only VIPs!!!
In short: AmaZix no longer belongs in the crypto space.
I am sure that beyond the claps received by those who didn’t even bother to read, most bounty hunters will take this announcement of yours as a big F YOU in return for all the hard work done — and most importantly, after months of loyalty built up towards the AmaZix brand.
You wrote: “ All bounty programs will now be called Community Rewards.”
My response: It is an insult to call it Community Rewards. Given that your focus will in the future only be on invite-only VIPs, you should call it Invite-Only VIP Rewards. As for us — bounty hunters at large in the crypto community — we will continue to call what we participate in, bounty programs. Nobody is going to change that and especially not at our expense.
You wrote: “ Rewards cannot be established as a function of raised funds. Essentially, this means that participants can no longer be rewarded based on or dependent on the money raised during a crowdfund, token sale or coin offering, as this would be perceived as participants being “on a commission”.
As such, reward allocations will need to be a fixed amount that is affordable for the partner, regardless of crowdfund performance.”
My response: What is the fixed amount called then, a salary or wage- and how is it better than commission — something that is earned in most affiliate programs (without the need for KYC)? By removing an increased reward from crowdfund performance, you’re going to completely destroy the incentive to perform — for those VIPs fortunate enough to be invited. Not even to mention the rest of us that will not even have the opportunity to participate.
You wrote: “ Participation in content creation will now be by invitation only. Most social networks, including Twitter and Facebook, have updated their Terms and Conditions so that it is no longer permissible to promote a business from a private or personal profile. In addition, both these platforms have banned paid advertising for ICOs. Hence, social media can not be used to participate in Community Rewards.”
“ Participation in content creation will now be by invitation only.”
My response: In other words, you’re telling 99.9% of those who supported you since the beginning that their contributions are of little value. This while you achieved network effect through the great number of participants — something that led to many successful ICOs.
Yes, they are banning paid advertising for ICOs in terms of twitter ads, but we are still allowed to tweet about ICOs and pretty much anything we like that is not offensive and/or constituted hate speech. You are just using it as an excuse to screw over the little guy, because without us in the picture — you and the invite-only VIP big boys get to earn more!
Cryptos were never about sucking up to so called VIPs and centralized authorities. Cryptos were born to bring as much benefit to humanity as possible. For once people can benefit— regardless of their race, religious affiliations, sexual preference and more. Yet, you now suddenly stand by those who want the exact opposite. Shame on you!
I am sickened by this turn of events. And I am sure many bounty hunters will agree with me. If you have your way, I bet all ICOs will pretty soon turn into IPOs run by the big boys on Wall Street! Then it will be rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat while the little guy has to bend over! And to think cryptos were supposed to change all of that! Yeah, let’s make it more centralized — invite-only VIPs!!!
In short: AmaZix no longer belongs in the crypto space.
Guys, is there any update on Amazix? As far as i know, they have changed the whole vision of bounty campaings.
What should we expect next?
Here is a FAQ page containing latest amazix changes. Read that now. They are moving more on a quality side.What should we expect next?
https://medium.com/amazix/amazix-community-rewards-your-questions-answered-31f02203ad0e
I agree that the bonus manager plays an important role in promoting the fast-spreading and popular advertising of the community. But I usually tend to choose the project idea and check the ìnormation, wP, roadmap of the project first.
Now, in all conditions of Bounty companies, the last line is a notice that the organizers and the manager can at any time at their discretion change all these rules. Therefore, you need to re-read them once a week.
It seems that you have chosen almost every bounty manager. Which Bounty managers are not good then?
respond to messages quickly
This aspect is most important in my opinion. At the first place, the manager should be so clear and evident that there should be no need for sending him messages. In case, it is required in emergency and an applicant sends a message to the manner, he must get a reply.
Current situation is that there is so much competition among applicants that they choose campaigns even if this aspect is ignored by the manger.
every bounty manager you mentioned, I think is very influential in the world of bounty campaign. because they are still running bounty because they are trusted people in this bitcointalk. I hope they will continue like this and choose a good bounty.
I participate in almost all the bounty campaigns which are led by Krypital and AmaZix. And also I like to do bounty on the G0blin. Always everything is clear, fair, simple rules and responsive managers.
I like team Amazix, Wapinter, Newsilike, Arteezy.rtx, x4, Sergei.Gerasimenko. I always try to get to them. There have never been complaints, respond to messages quickly
Nice info Guys, Every member in this forum must have their own favorite manager, but the favorite manager for me is Sylon, needmoney, deadly, because the rules on the project are easy to understand and not hard to do.
But token suite is not very good. Recently hexcash make fool of them and other bounty Hunters too. Hexcash is a scam and don't pay any thing. Token suite admitted it. How can these be non serious after having good reputation.
I think this is an interesting topic because this we can compare which manager is best for us.
but if I prefer managers, Needmoney, Newsilike, Arshe26 because I always participate in their projects.
but if I prefer managers, Needmoney, Newsilike, Arshe26 because I always participate in their projects.
I like sylon, amazix and tokensuite. Bounty managers need to answer requests about the project. I do not like campaign managers who do not communicate with people at all, when it is a mistake all your efforts go to waste.
Very helpful. I will add a reference in the future. I think everything will agree if they can be said to be currently trustworthy managers because they have handled some projects that can be said to be successful.
Jump to: