Topic: Good crypto casino comparison site (Read 457 times)

Yes, in part it intrigues me sometimes to see casinos that are not in the forum, at first I review them because there are many casinos that are not crypto-style and that do not promote them through the forum, obviously who would tell them to put the option of crypto, for us it is always better to work with money in crypto, when it comes to fiat things can be very complicated, especially when transactions are made from other banks, the fact that they arrive, some have the options of Srill or Paypal, but I think that the main thing should be at least USDT, which is well accepted, Bitcoin or other crypto maybe not due to its high volatility and it can be understood, but in the same way those sites I don't know if they are so reliable.


Of course what happens is that it is very difficult that with some criteria they do not coincide with those that are in the top 10 of the best casinos, there is always a lot of discrepancy and difference between what OP shows, for me there is no point of comparison, for sure stake.co, I see it well, Playbet and betcoin, I have seen other sites that are relatively new and I have also seen new threads that put a lot of mbitcasino, it may be a strong marketing campaign for this casino and they can manage to position it As one of the best in the forum, all publicity is worth it, but to compete with the big ones, it is also necessary to have some seniority.

maybe you can request them to review your mentioned casinos. they have their own criteria as listed also on their page. for them, those are their top 5 casinos according to their criteria. every review or ranking site has their own top list depending on their reviews and experiences. so you can't expect that they will list casinos that you think are deserving on their list.

Hi, I want to ask the author - why "top 5 casinos"? You should add more casinos, because it seems that this is a biased list. In my opinion fairspin and justbit should be on the list, I think those casinos are very good.

A nice wall of gambling guide write- tips....
We have alot more trusted gambling sites for enthusiastic gamblers but, you did well to name 'em on your  own part, yunno.

IT'S ONLY A SCAM IF YOU FALL FOR IT.
Some Peeps complain bitterly about how they've been roobed off their cash on several occasions, on different casinos -- one of which is the one I'm promoting -- but, if you look really deep, you'll discover that these assholes are defrauders and deserve any punishable means that the management decides to impose on 'em. Sometimes, Peeps just go deposit cash, book games then, click the cash out just to make unusual profits.. that's defrauding. (Sorry for going a bit off points though but, I think it's imperative)
Kudos buddy.

User feedback-definitely. There are various casino sites to choose from, If you're a gambler who will solely depend on what the sute itself is promoting, that would be biased on their end and won't generate a more reliable verdict about that gambling site. Check for its popularity and reviews from other people. By means of review is asking directly from people you know to get an honest opinion. Some gambling sites, especially the new ones, would do everything to please its audience and that is why they are presenting themselves as something promising for possible or potential players.

My personal opinion is that this website is more like an advertising integration than a website whose owner would do real independent research, analysis of casinos and make their comparisons. That's why I would not advise to listen to such sources, but rather to read real reviews from respected users of this forum. This will give a much better idea of the gambling sites.

This can be done to avoid being a victim of false review sites.

Getting the top preferred casino sites that legit players are playing on can help you narrow down your list. The top casinos in the leaderboard can be your guide on what you look for and which you will background check that is worth your time because it is reputable. But of course, you still have to countercheck all of the information provided so that you won't be shocked by the features and game variation as well as the processes inside that casino platform. Reading here in forum could definitely help too because there are different kinds of players here which can give you a true feedback about the casino they already played. Just make sure to check as well the credibility of the member to verify their statement.

An interesting approach to the list of the best casinos under consideration, from which we are offered a list of five online casinos that simply move along the leaderboard depending on which tab of the site you go to, why not just call sai the 5 best online crypto casinos.

I agree with this. A site pretending to be a legit review website is rampant nowadays. These kind of websites have fake reviews in it with nothing but good words to endorse the casino that paid them to do so or is affiliated with them. Most of the review sites there is have a fake review content because some people are being paid for writing good reviews and feedback to boost the casino's entry players. If you happen to stumble upon a website that is full of reviews from dummy accounts or accounts that holds no credibility, doubt already. Otherwise, you'll just end up being a victim if you will believe what's written in it.

If you consider yourself a responsible gambler, background checking is a must. You won't easily believe review sites that don't have a credible background and reputation to begin with. Discerning which is true to which is not will be easy to you because you are used to double checking information in the Internet, in the forum, and through reliable personalities.

Upon checking on his post history, most likely the reason why the OP is not posting any update about this gambling review platform is because he doesn't own it. It looks like OP is an ANN designer as well as he post those ANN Thread. You can see on the threads the OP posted are about different altcoin ANN Thread as well as Service Threads.

It's highly unlikely that OP will respond to this thread anymore and update the list on the review site.

Anyways, as for the list on the review platform, it looks like it's outdated as most of them are famous gambling platform from the forum however there much more trusted and reputable gambling website that are comparable from the review list.

The OP's list is not peculiar but it was common because if we browse other gambling review sites, we can see that they also prioritize casinos which are not found in this forum. I think the reason why they put stake casino in the second spot and bitstarz at first because it is stated that bitstarz has no withdrawal fees and then they have a massive 2.7k+ games.

Stake has a lot of games but I don't think their number crosses a thousand or more plus stake do also have a withdrawal fee but the fees can always be manageable if we use cheap altcoins and tokens. Another thing that stake don't have but bitstarz have is the sign up bonus or the deposit bonus.

I would advise everyone to take "comparison" or "review" sites with a grain of salt.

As some of you know, these review sites function, just like any other business, on a business plan. A plan on how to make profits and create partnerships. These partnerships could include selling positive reviews for a certain amount of money. In such cases, there can be nothing said about the actual review/comparison of the site as the site itself is only an illusion of a review site.

I am not sure about OP's website but the best thing to do is to review comments and ratings from many authentic people. Like well trusted and old members of the bitcointalk gambling sub-forum. They will be more than happy to offer you advice on which sites are better than others. In fact we even made a list of crypto sites and their comparisons (see upper posts). So trusting review sites for crypto gambling is unnecessary.

So topics like these are unnecessary and very sketchy. I would avoid anyone claiming to offer such services, especially if they have a bad /no reputation on this forum yet.

I've checked OP'spost history and seems not interested to promote this casino review site, he is actively posting in the altcoin section I don't know why he is not interested anymore when there's a lot of money to be made in the casino review site, lack of interest in his review site could be the reason why there is no update on the casino I'm ok with Stake and Betcoin.ag being on top but MBIT and Bitstarz don't deserve on that position, but since we are bumping his thread, there's a possibility that he will be active in this thread again if he is still roaming in the gambling section.

I didn’t see any comparison related article in this site. And i'm very surprised to see BitStarz is number one casino site in your top list ranking, Lol! It’s a undoubtedly SCAM casino site, there are many fraud allegations about it. Right, now so many popular crypto casino platforms, i didn’t see any one of them in here as like couldbet,fortunejack,rollbit,duelbits,sportsbet & trustdice etc.

Well I see that OP has a somewhat peculiar list, honestly it is not because I am a faithful follower and that the word of stake.com spreads, but I think that they should be first, as soon as I saw the aspects that they take into account to make the review and to place it in the places, I don't think it's the right one, I understand that stake.com is one of the best casinos in the forum and it's from bitstars, it's really new to me and I think it's not here in the forum, so that is something that influences a lot, I did not see bitcasino.io, Duelbtis, Rollbit, Roobet in the selection that meet many of the characteristics that you take into account, betcoin.ag and playbetr seem good to me, it is only my opinion of course this.

As long as you are giving the rating according to your actual experience, that's fine.
But if you are just giving the rating because other players's says so, then, that's the problem.
Much better if you can give rating not just because of couple of games, but maybe like few months of playing on the site.
That's when you will get a better insight regarding their services. But if only a game or two, I don't think you can see their true color.

Its just totally plan and simple plus having those sites been listed including bitstarz which does have lots of issues
then i dont see already for this to be an accurate or a good site to look upon.
For some reference;
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitstarz-is-a-scam-do-not-deposit-a-dime-fake-license-casino-5184263
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitstarz-casino-review-scam-hundreds-of-people-musst-see-5231796
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-bitstarz-350-dollars-5187887

How could a site do miss out these things?

Hi, yes, you're right about the subjectivity, now I play at Katsubet and I like it, I would like to include it on the list, I also played in Fairspin and it also deserves a place in this rating, my profitability for the one day was 20%, of course, it not always like this, but very often and in general is not easy to make a rating that would please everyone
https://i.ibb.co/k3mQrGg/image.jpg

A very small list, I would advise the author to include more casinos, Because I get the impression that the rating is very subjective, I have played in many cryptocasinos and I want to say that there are more worthy for this list than the ones that are presented there

Promoting a kind of casino comparison site that way will only leave a bad impression. It doesn't need to have a complete list of casino sites but at least add more so it would be more reliable. Op lacks more details about his promotion so I hope that he could add more or even improve its graphics or add a little animation to make it more attractive. I hope the suggestions here would help you to improve on what you're promoting because first impressions last.