- We are a legit registered company, operated by Fidelity Limited in Belize where our corporate offices are located.
- Our ToS and Asset Issuer ToS are drastically different such that they should be legally protective of the site and the issuers.
- We grant access via the site and a JSON API to an asset issuers shareholder list. Thus they can download it at any time.
- We email the asset issuers a copy of their shareholder list every 12 hours.
We do not lock in asset issuers, and believe that even if we fail, the show must go on.
Addressing the server access... The company cannot yet afford to hire another systems administrator, but should a systems administrator attain enough shares, (and thus have a vested interest in the success of the exchange) I would not be opposed to granting access. One of the key issues for me is trust... I consider the data on the servers -extremely- sensitive. A leak of the site code or the user's data would be a horrible blow to the company.
Cheers.
I have not addressed the administrative access to the servers though. Right now it is just me, and it will stay that way until
I agree that the server data should be treated with extreme sensitivity obviously. The issue with one person being in control isn't as bad when asset issuers get constant updates of their shareholder lists, so that quells my concern a bit. I still think that there should be more than one person with access, but it makes perfect sense that finding such a person will take time and lots of trust.