Pages:
Author

Topic: GoT - Two Swords (Read 1066 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 11, 2014, 06:54:15 PM
#27
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy

Would you've been happier if they quickly rubbed some dirt or foiliage across their face?

no

because it's too stupid to look trough a 20 inch gap when you're "hiding" from someone who is 5 meters away from you and act like no one can see us

god damn it

the bush is made that way you can see trough it when you're standing next to it and people further away can't see you, just look trough the fucking bush

But then the camera can't see their lovely faces  Cheesy

How about this:



 Grin

they could of made it the way so you can only see their eyes from up-close..

it would be much more realistic

But if it was too realistic you'd be complaining that you couldn't see them haha. Someone should photoshop that picture so there's just two little eyeholes  Cheesy.

they could of simply film from their side of the bush, why is there need to film from the opposite side Cheesy
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 11, 2014, 02:15:19 PM
#26
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy

Would you've been happier if they quickly rubbed some dirt or foiliage across their face?

no

because it's too stupid to look trough a 20 inch gap when you're "hiding" from someone who is 5 meters away from you and act like no one can see us

god damn it

the bush is made that way you can see trough it when you're standing next to it and people further away can't see you, just look trough the fucking bush

But then the camera can't see their lovely faces  Cheesy

How about this:



 Grin

they could of made it the way so you can only see their eyes from up-close..

it would be much more realistic

But if it was too realistic you'd be complaining that you couldn't see them haha. Someone should photoshop that picture so there's just two little eyeholes  Cheesy.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 11, 2014, 01:49:23 PM
#25
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy

Would you've been happier if they quickly rubbed some dirt or foiliage across their face?

no

because it's too stupid to look trough a 20 inch gap when you're "hiding" from someone who is 5 meters away from you and act like no one can see us

god damn it

the bush is made that way you can see trough it when you're standing next to it and people further away can't see you, just look trough the fucking bush

But then the camera can't see their lovely faces  Cheesy

How about this:



 Grin

they could of made it the way so you can only see their eyes from up-close..

it would be much more realistic
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 10, 2014, 04:03:52 PM
#24
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy

Would you've been happier if they quickly rubbed some dirt or foiliage across their face?

no

because it's too stupid to look trough a 20 inch gap when you're "hiding" from someone who is 5 meters away from you and act like no one can see us

god damn it

the bush is made that way you can see trough it when you're standing next to it and people further away can't see you, just look trough the fucking bush

But then the camera can't see their lovely faces  Cheesy

How about this:



 Grin
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 10, 2014, 03:52:23 PM
#23
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy

Would you've been happier if they quickly rubbed some dirt or foiliage across their face?

no

because it's too stupid to look trough a 20 inch gap when you're "hiding" from someone who is 5 meters away from you and act like no one can see us

god damn it

the bush is made that way you can see trough it when you're standing next to it and people further away can't see you, just look trough the fucking bush
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 10, 2014, 03:47:18 PM
#22
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy

Would you've been happier if they quickly rubbed some dirt or foiliage across their face?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 10, 2014, 03:39:27 PM
#21
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy

I don't think so

if they weren't behind the bush someone might mistake them for common people while this way it's just silly Cheesy
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 10, 2014, 03:27:12 PM
#20
But surely it's better than no bush at all?  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 10, 2014, 03:14:52 PM
#19
What the hell is wrong with you OP?



The biggest problem I had with that episode is the fact that they replaced Daario Naharis. They pretty-boy HE-MAN lookalike from last season was perfect for that role, now we got some lame ass average joe... wtf?! I liked that character too

I know, I  was just commenting on the picture, I didn't say it's a bad thing

I was saying that this thing isn't camouflage when they're  standing really near to everyone else

I mean seriously, it's like 5 meters, it's like there is no bush at all
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
April 10, 2014, 02:08:52 PM
#18
What the hell is wrong with you OP?



The biggest problem I had with that episode is the fact that they replaced Daario Naharis. They pretty-boy HE-MAN lookalike from last season was perfect for that role, now we got some lame ass average joe... wtf?! I liked that character too

Agreed
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
April 10, 2014, 01:10:56 PM
#17
Looking forward to next episode , ep 1  has just started the fun.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
April 10, 2014, 12:30:11 PM
#16
What the hell is wrong with you OP?



The biggest problem I had with that episode is the fact that they replaced Daario Naharis. They pretty-boy HE-MAN lookalike from last season was perfect for that role, now we got some lame ass average joe... wtf?! I liked that character too
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
April 10, 2014, 08:37:43 AM
#15
No...?

they can be seen, they're standing right at the place where there is no bush


it's a bit stupid, they can see trough it but everyone could see them too

makes no sense, they should be behind the regular bush so no one can see them and they could still see others trough the small gaps

When people are looking for you, you don't need to be super hidden.
member
Activity: 138
Merit: 10
April 10, 2014, 04:13:44 AM
#14
Congratulations! You have pretty twisted fantasies my friend Smiley
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 10, 2014, 03:36:58 AM
#13
Maybe they needed minimal camouflage but to also be able to see clearly? I've not seen it so I don't know the context.

that's not camouflage, it's like looking trough a window

Of course it's camouflage, and note the keyword minimal. You don't have to be 100% invisible. People far away probably wouldn't see them, as opposed to being stood out in the open where they would.

they weren't that far away..

As I said before, I don't know the context, but they're still camoflaged.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 10, 2014, 03:29:57 AM
#12
Maybe they needed minimal camouflage but to also be able to see clearly? I've not seen it so I don't know the context.

that's not camouflage, it's like looking trough a window

Of course it's camouflage, and note the keyword minimal. You don't have to be 100% invisible. People far away probably wouldn't see them, as opposed to being stood out in the open where they would.

they weren't that far away..
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1005
★Nitrogensports.eu★
April 09, 2014, 05:57:51 PM
#11
All I have to say that they need good camo uniforms or ghillie suit in GoT universe, or good invisibility spells Tongue
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 09, 2014, 05:11:04 PM
#10
Maybe they needed minimal camouflage but to also be able to see clearly? I've not seen it so I don't know the context.

that's not camouflage, it's like looking trough a window

Of course it's camouflage, and note the keyword minimal. You don't have to be 100% invisible. People far away probably wouldn't see them, as opposed to being stood out in the open where they would.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
April 09, 2014, 04:47:01 PM
#9
Maybe they needed minimal camouflage but to also be able to see clearly? I've not seen it so I don't know the context.

that's not camouflage, it's like looking trough a window
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
April 09, 2014, 04:18:00 PM
#8
Maybe they needed minimal camouflage but to also be able to see clearly? I've not seen it so I don't know the context.
Pages:
Jump to: