Pages:
Author

Topic: Government backed, regulated gambling is more predatory than Crypto Gambling (Read 290 times)

Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 401
Quote
(which was discouraged by a lot of people in the community).

I bet they did this to stop people from clogging the blockchain transactions.


Quote
Then there was another site where you could bet on the outcome of any event. Anyone could create a bet and anyone could bet on it.

This sounds interesting.  I read similar stuff exist on augur blockchain. Are there other platforms with similar betting -?  It would great if we could bet on things other than sports, entertainment and politics
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1491
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
And yet the government backed, sponsored and advertised gambling has a much larger scale, and it's much more predatory.

I don’t agree with you. You are basing your argument on the scale of the business and if bitcoin gambling was given free way, it would be at least as harmful as government backed gambling.

Here is an excellent starter video on the topic of the lottery in the US: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PK-netuhHA (I don't agree with all of John Oliver's points, but you'll get an idea).

And there are infinite more cases of people addicted to the lottery, notably, Elliot Rodger https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrGrp4ZYrjg

No wonder why the lottery is called a tax on stupid people, as the vast majority of people lose money. But that could be said of all casino games. Anyway, I don’t think there are more people addicted to the lottery than to online gambling in general.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1025
With regards to the government, I guessed that money wasn't a fair method of regulations. Talking about black money, the laundering act was a worst scenario that had happened on authorities doing such corruption of power. Fair regulations doesn't initiate fair contribution to the growing economy of the country. There's always an underground manifestation against the funds collected through gambling association, which really attracts greedy intentions to those gambling operators.
Among this game sessions, there is a strong back of government to many gambling casinos. Most of time these politicians are shareholders in such casinos. As far as crypto vs regulated gambling is concerned, we don’t have to get into details and such comparisons shouldn’t be made. I believe, we all must think how we can extract out all such stupid fellows who are getting in here but I am afraid we may not find any solution here as underground business are prime income source to most politicians hence regulating them will be highly impossible. But in my observation such government backed casinos are lagging with latest security and algorithm updates which may be a loophole to crack them out easily.
full member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 106
Yes, but the problem is that the government is sponsoring it. We have to hold the government to a higher standard because it is supposed to represent the interests of the people.

This is much more complicated. Most  of the governments support these things mainly because of the tax they get. This tax is used for the welfare of poor and unprivileged and thus ultimately the money goes to those who need it. However, if the government is corrupt, then the money might not be reaching right hands.

Even if government completely bans these things, people will find loopholes or alternatives.

hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 704
I've noticed the same tendency in my country, but not with online casinos, with the real ones. Firstly, the government banned all private casinos (apparently because they were making too much money), but the law said that all kinds of casinos should be banned. Then, one year after another different establishments began to appear on the streets that said "national lottery", but when I came in one of those - it was just the same old casino, that said it's a lottery, and there are much more of them now, than there were private casinos. Now, as long as gamblers need to play their games they switched to those "lotteries" and all of the money goes to the government, but you can imagine how much black money can be made there and money laundering as well. So I absolutely agree with you here, crypto gambling isn't that burglarious.
It is rare that in my country the government does something as open as that, most of the time the corruption happens with the permissions given by it, in my country there were only a handful of casinos, and then one of the government officials before leaving his mandate gave thousands of permissions in a single day.

It is obvious he received money for that and now casinos have become a recurrent sight in the place that I live, do not get me wrong I like to gamble once in a while but since I know those casinos are there because of the corruption of government officials that love to sell our country I prefer to play in the casinos I knew were there before that or to gamble online.
hero member
Activity: 1139
Merit: 500
I've noticed the same tendency in my country, but not with online casinos, with the real ones. Firstly, the government banned all private casinos (apparently because they were making too much money), but the law said that all kinds of casinos should be banned. Then, one year after another different establishments began to appear on the streets that said "national lottery", but when I came in one of those - it was just the same old casino, that said it's a lottery, and there are much more of them now, than there were private casinos. Now, as long as gamblers need to play their games they switched to those "lotteries" and all of the money goes to the government, but you can imagine how much black money can be made there and money laundering as well. So I absolutely agree with you here, crypto gambling isn't that burglarious.

With regards to the government, I guessed that money wasn't a fair method of regulations. Talking about black money, the laundering act was a worst scenario that had happened on authorities doing such corruption of power. Fair regulations doesn't initiate fair contribution to the growing economy of the country. There's always an underground manifestation against the funds collected through gambling association, which really attracts greedy intentions to those gambling operators.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 622
I've noticed the same tendency in my country, but not with online casinos, with the real ones. Firstly, the government banned all private casinos (apparently because they were making too much money), but the law said that all kinds of casinos should be banned. Then, one year after another different establishments began to appear on the streets that said "national lottery", but when I came in one of those - it was just the same old casino, that said it's a lottery, and there are much more of them now, than there were private casinos. Now, as long as gamblers need to play their games they switched to those "lotteries" and all of the money goes to the government, but you can imagine how much black money can be made there and money laundering as well. So I absolutely agree with you here, crypto gambling isn't that burglarious.
hero member
Activity: 2310
Merit: 757
Bitcoin = Financial freedom
They do whatever they want, if country bans gambling, then why the hell do they leave lottery? It's simply hilarious.
To my mind, country has to regulate gambling a little bit, for example they have to prohibit gambling for poor people, on another hand this business has to be free. Every casino claims to not gamble for profit, it's only for fun. When you are rich and still gamble for profit, then you absolutely deserve if you lose but when man is poor and he gambles casino, it's because of profit and everyone knows it well.
I don't think any governments want to save the economically backward people,they are banning it for some other reasons like money laundering or religious problems.But the gambling is only for fun purpose but the people doing this as a profit making job but they need to realize that they have chance of losing their money is more.So if they still doing that for money then they will get what they deserved.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 511
Yes, but the problem is that the government is sponsoring it. We have to hold the government to a higher standard because it is supposed to represent the interests of the people.

I agree with you in principle, but if you think the government represents the interests of the people over the interests of themselves, you're kidding yourself.

I couldn't agree more with you on the standards a government should hold and encouraging gambling regardless of whether its fiat casinos or crypto should not be supported - that's my opinion, anyways.
I second this thing. We must not be endorsing governments or pumping them to legalize this game just because we want to earn this this fake money. Why we are full class ready just to make this shit happens and ruin our lives? Why still there are gamblers and casinos that are running under nose of politicians and government law enforcement agencies. This is a big monopoly.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
The only reason government bans their citizens from participating in online gambling activities is because they're not regulated and they can't charge taxes on these online services. To be specific, only US government have strict policies regarding online gambling. Meanwhile, it's totally alright to gamble in Las Vegas or participate in the lotteries carried out all over the country.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 104
Nothing new to this news governmnet official always finding how to collect taxes and it's okay because is under lpgivermnet law paying of taxes and also reguleted the gamblng site protection and security.
copper member
Activity: 518
Merit: 26
They do whatever they want, if country bans gambling, then why the hell do they leave lottery? It's simply hilarious.
To my mind, country has to regulate gambling a little bit, for example they have to prohibit gambling for poor people, on another hand this business has to be free. Every casino claims to not gamble for profit, it's only for fun. When you are rich and still gamble for profit, then you absolutely deserve if you lose but when man is poor and he gambles casino, it's because of profit and everyone knows it well.

Sometimes they regulate because of hackers and taking care of taxes support vs money laundering.


No country has ever regulated gambling because of hackers.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1171
They do whatever they want, if country bans gambling, then why the hell do they leave lottery? It's simply hilarious.
To my mind, country has to regulate gambling a little bit, for example they have to prohibit gambling for poor people, on another hand this business has to be free. Every casino claims to not gamble for profit, it's only for fun. When you are rich and still gamble for profit, then you absolutely deserve if you lose but when man is poor and he gambles casino, it's because of profit and everyone knows it well.

You know what's even more hypocritical? In my country (Belgium) they're talking about banning all gambling related advertising.
Yet one of the most deceptive ads currently running is that of the national lottery.

I think it's a lot more deceptive than most of the casino ads we're seeing. They present this image that you'll become rich, just be playing the lottery.
While the regular casinos usually focus on presenting their games as fun, not something that will get you high profits.

The same is in my country too, its happen everywhere, but we all come down to one thing, it's what we talk about here for years, you can't compare centralized with decentralized system. In centralized system the ones on top do what ever suits them, they control the game, they control the players and they so what ever they wish, in decentralized system all of us have some voice.
This is great thread because it's open a big question, to trust government and politicians or to have trust in people around the world?
I agree with headline completely, governments are more predatory in every sense, in gambling too, that's why my choice is crypto in gambling and everything else.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283
They do whatever they want, if country bans gambling, then why the hell do they leave lottery? It's simply hilarious.
To my mind, country has to regulate gambling a little bit, for example they have to prohibit gambling for poor people, on another hand this business has to be free. Every casino claims to not gamble for profit, it's only for fun. When you are rich and still gamble for profit, then you absolutely deserve if you lose but when man is poor and he gambles casino, it's because of profit and everyone knows it well.

You know what's even more hypocritical? In my country (Belgium) they're talking about banning all gambling related advertising.
Yet one of the most deceptive ads currently running is that of the national lottery.

I think it's a lot more deceptive than most of the casino ads we're seeing. They present this image that you'll become rich, just be playing the lottery.
While the regular casinos usually focus on presenting their games as fun, not something that will get you high profits.
member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
They do whatever they want, if country bans gambling, then why the hell do they leave lottery? It's simply hilarious.
To my mind, country has to regulate gambling a little bit, for example they have to prohibit gambling for poor people, on another hand this business has to be free. Every casino claims to not gamble for profit, it's only for fun. When you are rich and still gamble for profit, then you absolutely deserve if you lose but when man is poor and he gambles casino, it's because of profit and everyone knows it well.

Sometimes they regulate because of hackers and taking care of taxes support vs money laundering.
hero member
Activity: 2198
Merit: 847
They do whatever they want, if country bans gambling, then why the hell do they leave lottery? It's simply hilarious.
To my mind, country has to regulate gambling a little bit, for example they have to prohibit gambling for poor people, on another hand this business has to be free. Every casino claims to not gamble for profit, it's only for fun. When you are rich and still gamble for profit, then you absolutely deserve if you lose but when man is poor and he gambles casino, it's because of profit and everyone knows it well.
member
Activity: 2226
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
There are more (way better) regulated stuff on gambling then it was before.
Including People waiting on U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) answer's about funding for crypto.

https://news.bitcoin.com/markets-update-crypto-prices-slide-after-sec-announcement/
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 569
And yet the government backed, sponsored and advertised gambling has a much larger scale, and it's much more predatory.

Government backed gambling is also morally bankrupt, as its advertised as a charity, but the money gets shuffled around and effectively no new money goes to the supported cause.

Here is an excellent starter video on the topic of the lottery in the US: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PK-netuhHA (I don't agree with all of John Oliver's points, but you'll get an idea).

And there are infinite more cases of people addicted to the lottery, notably, Elliot Rodger https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrGrp4ZYrjg



The issue of gambling is a one sensitive one that catch the attention of any serious government and not the US alone especially those that have legalised the trade. That the money advertised under the guise or charity then channelled through other route are mere conjectures except there is a valid evidence to support that. The gambling industry is large for every activities to be closely monitored without some lapses.

On the part of bitcoin being on the disadvantage as against the support the fiat counterpart the reason for that I believe is not far fetched at all and its all about not being able to control and how fund is being moved considering the misconception of illegal activities being carried on with it but I still feel strongly gradually this is being corrected and with time, things might begin to start falling in place.
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 606
Buy The F*cking Dip
Well, in my own point of view, any corporation/sector/business that is completely backed by the government reeks of corruption and is more immoral in every sense than any cryptogambling site out there that promotes anonymity. The only purpose of these government-backed corporations, be it in gambling or in any other sector of the community, is to take advantage of its own people for the benefit of those officials who are doing nothing and just make their bellies much bigger than it was before. They will prey on every opportunity just to get more money through corruption and underhanded activities.  Angry
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 704
What you say is true, but when has that ever stopped the government, or any industry for that matter? Fast food, alcohol, video games, (in some countries) smoking, are all advertised in a predatory way. The organizations behind these products do not care at all about individuals, their health, or potential financial problems. All they care about is getting your to part with your money.

Yes, but the problem is that the government is sponsoring it. We have to hold the government to a higher standard because it is supposed to represent the interests of the people.

Private corporations are supposed to have a fiduciary obligation to their shareholders and their job is to carefully walk the line between what is allowed and not allowed.

The government is supposed to be painting that line, so when they create and advertise their gambling products they get a lot more leeway.

It's like John Oliver said towards the end of his segment from 2014. (watch 20 seconds from the timestamp) https://youtu.be/9PK-netuhHA?t=13m53s .
You make some good points but you are operating under the premise that governments want the best for the people and that has not been true for a long time, that is the way most governments start but after some time the governments only care about one thing, their own preservation.

This is the main reason of why there is so much opposition against bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, if they were honest they will understand that fiat money has been a complete failure and that we need a new system, maybe one based on gold or one based on bitcoin to guarantee that they do not screw up the economy again, but are we seeing that? Of course not, they are seeing that bitcoin is a threat to their interests and they want to ban it or at least to regulate it.
Pages:
Jump to: