Impressive to see that some other government around the world uses the same tactics as the government where I am located from several years now and from where bad or good it be I don't want to get moving again,I have created my legacy here so I am OK.The fact that the government takes a slice of every business is the same as where I live.In fact they were so massively involved in making gambling prohibited offline or online favoring clearly the brother of the Prime minister as only his website can be accessed online without VPN,all other websites that have the word "bet" in their domain are totally closed.Same with offline casinos,only the two big ones Regency and Grand are open,every body else was shut down.The two big ones are owned by deputy parliamentarians,they have big shares in them that is why they are open.
Corruption is the same all over the world. Somewhere it is allowed to grow and somewhere not. Any decision to have the state control something increases the possibility of corruption, so what is discussed in this thread has a simple answer: the government should not own any business. If this happens in a democratic country, then the abuses will be small (but they will definitely be), and if in a non-democratic country, then everything will end up with either the dictator directly or his relatives owning the business.
The truth and the saddest part of it all is that the companies where the government is owned have gone bankrupt, that's because the government members use the services of the government company free. for example:
government airline = they always go bankrupt because government members travel for free
telecommunications companies = go bankrupt because government officials talk about free, they don't pay anything
That way, the poorer you get, but if it were under private management, companies would be more profitable and would pay taxes
I am not very clear about what the governments are like in other countries, or if in Europe I clearly think that the governments are much more transparent and ethical than in South America and may have enough ethics for it, but at least where I live, the things are not like that, first of all the government wants to manage everything and have its slice of money in each business that is generated, if it is not under their tutelage, then it simply does not happen, and if it happens secretly from the government they run with the risk of being imprisoned, therefore everything that is given in the name of a government, be it a casino or something similar, at least I would stay well away.
Good to hear that transparency still works from where you are, as from my location corrupt officials still exist,
we do have different opinions as per our experiences and out thinking about how the government will handle and operate
their own online gambling site.
If it's pro-people in terms of good sources of taxes and profits and it can be used properly for the government project
then it will be a good project for the government.
Yes, in part those who adhere to doing everything the government says and conditions, well, there is no problem and it can be opened to all people, of course I think that what they give to the government in monetary terms is quite a lot, but it is What must be done to stay active and offer the service, but given that the casinos have been out of the country for almost 20 years, anyone who wants to make a deal with the government is still very profitable. Of course, the few casinos that exist bring in a lot of money, I believe that a monopolization of the business will be generated for those who decide to take the risk.
with some casino could you make a deal with some government and that be profitable? I don't understand how this would be good for the casino? because the casino would have to keep paying taxes and respecting the laws, they wouldn't have any extra privileges with a government deal.
I wouldn't advise anyone to even trust the government for once if they allow bitcoin to be used in their casino,
I agree, if any casino owner trusts the governments then maybe this casino owner is a former member of the government or someone very important in the country's politics, in a scenario like this the casino owner can benefit from this partnership because many times in all this crime is involved