It's not "greed" when you take what you need to survive.
It's greed when you are set for life, and you still actively work to get as much profit as possible from everyone. (I don't think sig campaigns are greedy)
I've never needed extra income as I have very few expenses other than food, utilities and property taxes. But being Legendary does not automatically mean "rich".
Topic: Greed or Need? What's changed with bitcointalk ? - page 2. (Read 531 times)
People enjoy this forum, it’s good to get paid for doing what you enjoy. Most high ranked accounts would still be here, participating on the forum if sigs were banned. They’re not banned though so it makes sense to get paid for posting, no?
Bitcoin has made my life & brought me amounts of money I never dreamed possible, I love this place. I don’t make any apologies for adding a little to my stash every week by wearing a sig though so I guess you can label me greedy (I’d post just as much if there were no sig campaigns regardless).
Bitcoin has made my life & brought me amounts of money I never dreamed possible, I love this place. I don’t make any apologies for adding a little to my stash every week by wearing a sig though so I guess you can label me greedy (I’d post just as much if there were no sig campaigns regardless).
For many years previously quite a few " legendaries" were happy to contribute without wearing a gambling or mixing sig.
Recently I have noted quite a few of these are now milking it to the max with both sigs and even deleting their personal avatars they have had for years to milk some extra via their avatars?
What's happening here?
Recently I have noted quite a few of these are now milking it to the max with both sigs and even deleting their personal avatars they have had for years to milk some extra via their avatars?
What's happening here?
Jump to: