Pages:
Author

Topic: Greg Maxwell is now the owner of Bitcoin. That's all. (Read 5080 times)

legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
So you do know many things about Bitcoin. That is good. God Created Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Does God has any proof that He created Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden ?

totally off topic, but ill have a stab at it

what if i told you the story of adam and eve was a story of biological evolution told to simpletons of many centuries ago (before books were public) in a camp storytime that they would remember via listening. told/preached by educated preachers (the religious order) to keep people from asking too many questions or trying to seek answer through learning to read or other sources. because reading was a skill only for the religious order and the rich.

so here it goes

Neanderthal males and females were the same species they shared the same DNA. so to explain that they are made from the same 'stuff' it was
simplified to. eve[female] was made using adams[male] rib (same bone marrow, dna and cells as adam). but subtle said this way to make females appear inferior to men aswell.

they became humans physically and gained knowledge and desire to learn and grasp ideas and concepts of good and evil after evolving a thyroid gland that changed them from Neanderthal to human.

(heres the science bit that even modern people cant grasp.. hence the word twisting of the middle ages)
the thyroid gland is in the throat some say its the shape of a butterfly others say the outline of an apple.. but the thyroid gland is what causes a lump in the throat by way of it and the thyroid cartilage .. this lump.. is called... the adams apple
simplified to. after eating[having] the adams apple [in their throat] they gained knowledge and skills and how they seen their bodies have changed too.

then their cousins appeared [the unevolved old Neanderthals] and they cross bred so the offspring too had a thyroid gland which strung a new dimension to the mental/physical capacity of the next generation. thus neanderphals died out and humans grew

the purpose of the adam and eve story is two fold.
give people basic knowledge of evolution because they couldnt read so it was told in story form preached around through the ages.
it was also a scare story that too much knowledge is bad and a sin. as a way to keep the preachers in power as the only story tellers
by making it impossible or hard to learn to read unless your in the religious order or super rich.[basically consultants dont want to give away all their knowledge or they will gain new competing consultants doing lecture tours stealing their business]

things like the normal little silent voice in your head that tells you not to put your hand in the fire, or not to be a thief [your subconscious] is just a part of your brain evolved thanks to the thyroid gland. but those rich controlling preachers needed to scare their flock, saying they will be punished
if people done bad things. so invented an explanation about human subconsciousness, while adding the (modern day fear concept) of someone is always watching you (big brother/government surveillance) as a way to keep the naive in check even when the preachers were not around.

where the truth is preachers wanted their naive flock[sheeple] to fear their own actions and punish themself with paranoia and worries of bad things happening to them.... and all "god" is, is our own sub-conscience

ill leave you to look at latest medical science as to all the functions of the thyroid gland. and why the derogatory term of not having a functioning thyroid gland [being a cretin] is used by rich snobby UK politicians for people acting like Neanderthals.

so to answer your question.
our own sub-conscience[god] is what tells us to evolve. by having sex and evolving by having new offspring thats a new mix that supposedly meant to be better than ourselves.

we are god and we evolved
sr. member
Activity: 477
Merit: 259
In contrast to Roger Ver and his army of trolls active in this thread, Greg did contribute significantly to Bitcoin progress and did a lot of work to improve security, scalability and privacy of Bitcoin. And I'm grateful for his work.

Roger Ver and his possibly bribed mining pools act out of pure self-interest. He is not trustworthy - not a bit.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
stephen mollah made some false companies in the last couple years.. not as far back as 2007
 no proof of any connection prior to well after bitcoin was released.
(dude cant even backdate properly)

moving on
Hi franky1, How are you ? Thanks for your coments.
 Why are you saying it is false companies ?  
(dude cant even backdate properly) What is that ?
When did you heard of the word 'Bitcoin' for the first time ?



mollah appointed 2014+  not prior to 2009
false companies because thier accounts look empty compared to real functioning company accounts
he failed to backdate anything that actually alludes to a true date proof of 2007

i first heard of bitcoin in 2011 and got high involved in 2012

So you do know many things about Bitcoin. That is good. God Created Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Does God has any proof that He created Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden ?
the answer will be who knows? If some one say that Satan who created Adam and Eve in the garden of Ethiopia and he produced a proof, many will believe in it. Why do you think he need to backdate ?

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026
bitcoin is open source there is no one controlling it,
It's just fun to say that, but everyone knows that even if 95% wanted some change, if Greg and Core and Blockstream were in that 5%, they could manage to 'convince' dumb Chinese miners that a hard fork would result and they should stick with Core. 

It isn't really Open Source.  A tiny minority can prevent a very popular change due to the difficulty reaching 'concensus'.  Threat of possible hard fork scares Chinese.
Do you have any proof of what you are claiming? What is that popular change you mean?
He has no proof of anything.  He doesn't need proof. 
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
bitcoin is open source there is no one controlling it,
It's just fun to say that, but everyone knows that even if 95% wanted some change, if Greg and Core and Blockstream were in that 5%, they could manage to 'convince' dumb Chinese miners that a hard fork would result and they should stick with Core. 

It isn't really Open Source.  A tiny minority can prevent a very popular change due to the difficulty reaching 'concensus'.  Threat of possible hard fork scares Chinese.
Do you have any proof of what you are claiming? What is that popular change you mean?
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
stephen mollah made some false companies in the last couple years.. not as far back as 2007
 no proof of any connection prior to well after bitcoin was released.
(dude cant even backdate properly)

moving on
Hi franky1, How are you ? Thanks for your coments.
 Why are you saying it is false companies ?  
(dude cant even backdate properly) What is that ?
When did you heard of the word 'Bitcoin' for the first time ?



mollah appointed 2014+  not prior to 2009
false companies because thier accounts look empty compared to real functioning company accounts
he failed to backdate anything that actually alludes to a true date proof of 2007

i first heard of bitcoin in 2011 and got high involved in 2012
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
stephen mollah made some false companies in the last couple years.. not as far back as 2007
 no proof of any connection prior to well after bitcoin was released.
(dude cant even backdate properly)

moving on
Hi franky1, How are you ? Thanks for your coments.
 Why are you saying it is false companies ?  
(dude cant even backdate properly) What is that ?
When did you heard of the word 'Bitcoin' for the first time ?

legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
stephen mollah made some false companies in the last couple years.. not as far back as 2007
 no proof of any connection prior to well after bitcoin was released.
(dude cant even backdate properly)

moving on
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Of course it's bullshit, everyone knows the real owner of Bitcoin is Stephen Mollah

When you search BITCOIN TECHNOLOGY LIMITED on the Companies House site, apart from the fact that it was dissolved in May 2016, it also shows the owner's name as Stephen MOLLAH and a list of grand sounding bitcoin related limited companies.

Search Stephen Mollah a bit deeper and you find this site

Where

Quote
The intellectual property office of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has made public the introduction of a patent application titled "Bitcoin Technology" with which it is intended to register the name of this technology as well as a homonym company and the graphic symbol of bitcoin.

The applicant is called Stephen Mollah , who claims rights to be solely responsible for the invention of the Bitcoin Technology and at the same time the position of Executive Director of the company Bitcoin Technology Limited.


Even the "Decentralised Patent Office" (wow much official) acknowledges him as Satoshi

Quote
Invention:  

Inventor: Mr. Stephen Mollah

Pseudonym: Satoshi Nakamoto

Date of Invention: 09.04.2007

Patent Rights By:
 Smiley
1. How do you know that Stephen Mollah is the real owner of Bitcoin ?
2. Who told you extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence ?



 
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Nobody can lay claim to Bitcoin even Greg Maxwell, although I will agree with you that we have more influencial people than others but who really care the folks on the street only care about the security of their BTC that is the primary thing.
hero member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 574
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
So he is Satoshi Nakamoto?
Why he is the owner of bitcoin? Can he control bitcoin? Ofcourse not! No one is controljng bitcoin and no one can control it. Where the hell did you get that news? It making me laugh.

i agree with this as we all having bitcoin in our wallet and we should be the owner of bitcoin too. bitcoin is belong for every people which want to make profit and they should be proud for this and maybe its only the hoax news to make that guy famous in bitcoin industry.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 520
So he is Satoshi Nakamoto?
Why he is the owner of bitcoin? Can he control bitcoin? Ofcourse not! No one is controljng bitcoin and no one can control it. Where the hell did you get that news? It making me laugh.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1823
If many people are very unhappy with Bitcoin because it is slow and has low transaction throughput, why not support Litecoin? It has 4 times the speed and 4 times the allowed transaction throughput. Roger Ver should start supporting it instead of advocating for his hard fork.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026
Shit.

Noone can own bitcoin. Get a brain.

Yep.. that's my thought too... The thread has a kind of bad premise, even if Maxwell has quite a bit of influence, he only has influence as long as he is making sense to convince others to go along with whatever he happens to be proposing to do or not do.

Pretty much. And claiming so is also pretty much a slap in the face to literally the hundreds of other contributors sending patches to wumpus—since the implication is clearly that they're too braindead to make up their own mind and instead just go along with whatever gmax says. This is partly the reason why the crazy people have basically zero developers helping them seize control.

And gmax doesn't have commit access to the repo anyway. Duh.


Is this all real or just a joke. So what will happen if somebody owns bitcoin, that is the next question. Will bitcoin be controlled by maxwell, will decentralization of  bitcoin remains or not? Will the blocksize changes or not?

Im not going to react neagatively as of now, but if things go out of control due to maxwell owning bitcoin then thats another story. Lets just hope that if maxwell owns bitcoin, bitcoin will be better than ever.
Maxwell owns bitcoin and things are not better than ever.  Worse than ever.  High fees, and terrible transaction throughput.  more than 50,000 stuck in the fucked up system.  With large blocks - bitcoin price would be over $1,500.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 544
Shit.

Noone can own bitcoin. Get a brain.

Yep.. that's my thought too... The thread has a kind of bad premise, even if Maxwell has quite a bit of influence, he only has influence as long as he is making sense to convince others to go along with whatever he happens to be proposing to do or not do.

Pretty much. And claiming so is also pretty much a slap in the face to literally the hundreds of other contributors sending patches to wumpus—since the implication is clearly that they're too braindead to make up their own mind and instead just go along with whatever gmax says. This is partly the reason why the crazy people have basically zero developers helping them seize control.

And gmax doesn't have commit access to the repo anyway. Duh.


Is this all real or just a joke. So what will happen if somebody owns bitcoin, that is the next question. Will bitcoin be controlled by maxwell, will decentralization of  bitcoin remains or not? Will the blocksize changes or not?

Im not going to react neagatively as of now, but if things go out of control due to maxwell owning bitcoin then thats another story. Lets just hope that if maxwell owns bitcoin, bitcoin will be better than ever.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 37
Shit.

Noone can own bitcoin. Get a brain.

Yep.. that's my thought too... The thread has a kind of bad premise, even if Maxwell has quite a bit of influence, he only has influence as long as he is making sense to convince others to go along with whatever he happens to be proposing to do or not do.

Pretty much. And claiming so is also pretty much a slap in the face to literally the hundreds of other contributors sending patches to wumpus—since the implication is clearly that they're too braindead to make up their own mind and instead just go along with whatever gmax says. This is partly the reason why the crazy people have basically zero developers helping them seize control.

And gmax doesn't have commit access to the repo anyway. Duh.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Upon reading, many developers hates him because they say that he is a toxic and not a good contributor.
This is correct.  Many hate him and he is not a good contributor.  We just can't get him to leave.  Somebody needs to delete his commit access like they did to Gavin

I don't know a lot about the topic, but my understanding is that there is a considerable difference between Gavin and Maxwell, just in terms of their level of activism in bitcoin.

Gavin had not contributed any code for years, he submitted some proposals that were not accepted (XT and Classic) and then he did the questionable thing with Craig Wright.

I thought that Maxwell did contribute code from time to time, and is very involved in core development issues.  You may not agree with some of the politics or methodologies of Maxwell or his way of expressing some of his views, but he seems to be actively involved and actively participating in core meetings on a regular basis, no?  so why would anyone have their commit access pulled when they are actively involved in software development, as a contrasting point to the lack of involvement of Gavin.. from my understanding of the matter.
hero member
Activity: 874
Merit: 1000
Upon reading, many developers hates him because they say that he is a toxic and not a good contributor.
This is correct.  Many hate him and he is not a good contributor.  We just can't get him to leave.  Somebody needs to delete his commit access like they did to Gavin
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
Too many people are gullible. Who would want to not go Anonymous?
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 594
I doubt it! I don't think so that there is an owner of bitcoin. All I know is all of us own it as long as we have in our wallets, I just knew is the creator only. Upon reading, many developers hates him because they say that he is a toxic and not a good contributor.
Pages:
Jump to: