Pages:
Author

Topic: [GRN] GraniteCoin heavy infringment!!!Be aware (Read 3253 times)

hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 501
no , another dead coin  Shocked
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
cough* hack* *cough *start your own nodes *cough.... oh sorry, excuse me... something happened. not sure what...
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Shopped  Wink ..

Live link or it did'nt happen.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
This is the screen shot of the current state of seed. This proves beyond doubt that it has not been restarted since the launch of GRN (May 22nd).



member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Right, this coin looks to be dead.
But it is highly probable, that this dude will repeat such cheat
with some next coin.
hero member
Activity: 701
Merit: 500
I think the most of (former) community think the same. Just after the scam of 10k block, the network power fall from 2 th into 150 mhash, and the price from 2000 sat into 150 sat. DEAD COIN.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
This guy wanted me to accept his amateur marketing offer. He had been sending me several pm's and I already informed him about my disinterest. Then he threatens FUD. We had bonus blocks multiple times before and never had any issue. His allegations are baseless and stupid. Same guy coming in multiple ids and spreading FUD. Just Ignore him.


It is fuckin' unfair to steal someones money,
when you are in deal with him.

So it is clear, that DEV is just an asshole.
hero member
Activity: 701
Merit: 500
GRN dev, if u feel innocent, why did you delete many early negative posts, including mine? DEAD SCAM COIN
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 136
Merit: 100
Come on guys grow up, stop trying to destroy a coin with assumptions!!

Firstly no i am not the granite developer, but i have been in crypto land for a very long time. Trust me if i posted using my developer account the amount of FUD heading your way would not be worth it!

Simply running getpeerinfo does not prove the granite developer stopped the nodes, and i say it again ,it would not matter if he had done so...

In the source  code in 'net.cpp' there is a single seed node address

Code:
// DNS seeds
// Each pair gives a source name and a seed name.
// The first name is used as information source for addrman.
// The second name should resolve to a list of seed addresses.
static const char *strMainNetDNSSeed[][2] = {
    {"seednode1.granitecoin.com", "seednode1.granitecoin.com"},
    {NULL, NULL}

};

- Do a DNS lookup against seednode1.granitecoin.com = 23.97.134.59

- In your wallet run 'getpeerinfo' and look for that address only, since that is the only official seed node (According to the source code) make a note of the start height.

- Now delete your block chain data. if you know what I'm talking about you will know how to do this!

- Restart your wallet and you will see the start height of all the peers is actually much higher that when you last looked, my wallet currently shows block 12007 and so does the peer info and block explorer. This is because this type of coin coding is self aware of checkpoints and will pass that info around all the peers.



If you need any more proof than this, maybe ask the dev to supply a screen shot of the seednode wallet start time, this will prove beyond doubt if it has been restarted recently

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
GraniteCoin -> consider GRN DEAD.

... and learn something from this - never cheat on the community
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10


Bad luck GranitecoinDev..
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
We had bonus blocks multiple times before and never had any issue.
Because you earned them all Cheesy It's simple as fuck!!!

Large increase of mining hasharate, 99% of net hashrate (2 GHs), and suddenly the bonus block didn't go to any big pool? Everyone know that 100k bonus is in dev wallet Wink
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Typical. I remember a similar issue with CleanWaterCoin.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Dear users,

Unfortunately I would like to alarm that GraniteCoin[GRN] should be delisted from @bitcointalk. Some infringment was recorded. The issue was made around 10000 block. This block was marked as special rewarded one! It was great oppurtunity to gain additional coins. You can check more information about specifications here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anngrn-granite-x11-digishield-bittrex-621544

Unfortunately some unusual things happened. Dev team has decided to switch  noods off, as a result he took over block 10000. The miners couldn't mine this block.

Official thread is self-moderated by GraniteDev, all post from injured party are deleted.  If everything is fine, why he is deleting without any explenation. Is there something to hide ?

Me and other miners are shocked. Can't belive what happened. All I want is to warm you and another institution/miners/community of cryptoworld. Beware !
Also in order that justice be done. Please cancel this suspicious coin from your list.

Please check evidence, it's obvious that we have been scammed
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2mmbz86&s=8#.U6vtsfl_uLY
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=1zgqjr4&s=8#.U6vuCPl_uLY
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=htz2fo&s=8#.U6vuQvl_uLY
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=333wvvm&s=8#.U6vuWvl_uLY
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2vwz5lj&s=8#.U6vuefl_uLY
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=9k2d4x&s=8#.U6vujPl_uLY
http://pl.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=mjyaza&s=8#.U6vup_l_uLY


Thank you.


If u are familiar with any kind of cryptomining u should know that turning off nodes would'nt change anything in such situation. u are kind of scammer that want to spread fud about granite just to buy cheap or make fake proof of sth.

Take a look at first picture and give me answer - why block 10k is not on the list Huh I dont have to be crypto expert to find out that it is too big coincidence...
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
This guy wanted me to accept his amateur marketing offer. He had been sending me several pm's and I already informed him about my disinterest. Then he threatens FUD. We had bonus blocks multiple times before and never had any issue. His allegations are baseless and stupid. Same guy coming in multiple ids and spreading FUD. Just Ignore him.

Smart answer, but YOU LIE. If someone is interested what REALLY happened please take a look on pictures in first post. That is great evidence !

That is sad but true....

newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
Turning off the seed nodes would not make any difference. the Nodes only exist for when new clients that come online and want to connect to the block chain. Once then have connected they pick up all the peer info for many other wallets on the network, then making the official seed nodes nodes not necessary. That is the point of why these wallets work as one great big web of connectivity.

There is no way that 1 person can take over a single block unless they pumped in 100s times more time hashing power just before that super block. and even then they have to be very lucky!

Also don't forget blocks can get orphaned too!

Here is the code that controls the bonus block, just in case you want to know what block number they actually fall on.


Code:

    else if (nHeight == 1500) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 5000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 10000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 20000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 40000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 60000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 80000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 100000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 150000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 262799) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }

    // Subsidy is cut in half every xxxx blocks
    nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 262800);

    return nSubsidy + nFees;
}



So how would you explain the situation, when one pool with large hash, which takes all of the blocks from 9980 to 9999 and from 10001 to 10006 and further was not able to get this bonus block ?

The hash power from this pool suddenly vaporize from network hashrate !?

Also a lot of peers were restarted at 9995 block, the same block which none of the pools couldn't confirmed to get for a few minutes ?
Too many coincidences ?!

Also the arrogance of dev, shows he has something to hide!
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
I agree

GRN = scam !

newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Yes it would. Check attached pics - getpeerinfo. This coin is a scam!
full member
Activity: 136
Merit: 100
Turning off the seed nodes would not make any difference. the Nodes only exist for when new clients that come online and want to connect to the block chain. Once then have connected they pick up all the peer info for many other wallets on the network, then making the official seed nodes nodes not necessary. That is the point of why these wallets work as one great big web of connectivity.

There is no way that 1 person can take over a single block unless they pumped in 100s times more time hashing power just before that super block. and even then they have to be very lucky!

Also don't forget blocks can get orphaned too!

Here is the code that controls the bonus block, just in case you want to know what block number they actually fall on.


Code:

    else if (nHeight == 1500) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 5000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 10000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 20000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 40000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 60000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 80000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 100000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 150000) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }
    else if (nHeight == 262799) //bonus block reward nHeight
    {
        int64 nSubsidy = 100000 * COIN;
        return nSubsidy + nFees;
    }

    // Subsidy is cut in half every xxxx blocks
    nSubsidy >>= (nHeight / 262800);

    return nSubsidy + nFees;
}

Pages:
Jump to: