Topic: [GUIDE] Bicknellski's Biased & Opinionated Miner Sellers Trustworthiness Guide - page 6. (Read 17623 times)

Yet, you're well aware of his threads and posts.  That's interesting, really.

You've been on mine since May April ^_^

Oooh ! Can I play too ?!

Christ Darin... such a fucking man-child.

I would like to say it's been nice knowing you... but...

Dare I ask what plot you are referring to ?

Is it the plot where you pontificate from your holier-than-thou glass house-on-high; slamming other vendors while you suffer with your own production setbacks and delays ?

Nope. No hypocrisy or double standard here.

Dogie and I aren't the problem here buddy. I appreciate what the dude has done for the community.

He's certainly contributed WAY more than you have at the end of the day.

A - Z for the Thumbs Up sounds doable... for the Thumbs Down don't really care.

My issue with you Bruno were simple ones. You know what they are / were no need to go into those I suppose that is for another thread.

Consider putting both lists in the OP in alphabetical order, bud.

I'm fully aware that you may still have your differences with me, for whatever reasons, but still I offer up this kind suggestion. Even if you implement my suggestion, feel free to maintain the sentiment you may still have toward me. I am glad we haven't locked horns lately, hoping this post doesn't rekindle said locking.

Somebody quote me in case I'm on ignore, echoing the suggestion if you believe it has merit.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Welcome to the ignore list. What you don't get is I don't really have time to CARE about your guide. Go fix it or don't, again not my problem. Doesn't seem to be about whether or not this guide ratings are up to snuff it is about you arguing about your thread and the WPC. Not really on topic. Ignored. Feel free to talk to the wall I will be focused on people who want to engage in debate on the topics offered here it is not about your threads so you can go back there and deal with your hurt feelings there. Note I haven't and won't change your trust rating it was never a ploy given it wasn't me that suggested your name to come to the WPC. Your rating is still valid after what BFL did as it was before what BFL did and that is the actual reason it was changed to the current rating nothing to do with the WPC sorry buddy way off the mark again.

What you still don't seem to understand is that when 20 people have different opinions, you can't make 20 people happy. 5-10 of those will not 'get their way' and will stomp and cry that you're not listening because you simply can't please everyone when you can only provide one solution. I don't think this thread will teach you that as a 'good/bad' system is as basic as it gets.

You seem to be the one with problem not me.

Ignore.

No point to listening to someone that lost the plot.

Seriously Darin ?!

Are you fucking serious right now ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7649232

Is your memory that short ?!

Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

Do what you like if you have problem with my ratings feel free to comment. All I see here is someone that can't accept constructive criticisms as evidenced in your thread by a significant number of people.

I am not concerned with your guide as much you seem to be concerned with mine. Feel free to ignore my biased one and work on your far superior less bias one. I won't be back commenting in yours trust me nothing seems to change even when people present you with evidence to the contrary.

We already heard your PLEA for me to go work on the WASP and again there are 54 others than can do more than they have already bar Dick I suppose so I am pretty comfortable posting my own guide and that has little or nothing to do with what is or isn't happening in the WPC. Just you go back to working on your threads you have more than enough to worry about than what I have as a hobby and it really is telling that you seem to want to make this about everything other than a simple guide for new miners. Sad. . Haters gonna hate and it is clear you have a problem with being a hater right now.



I don't think so buddy. You got all that backwards. As for being or not being a member... if you paid your $100 you are a member. If you didn't sorry you are receiving emails. I am sure we can rectify that easily.

You mean like how you accused me of being biased, even though my rating scheme is laid out in full, is numerical and is automatic according to the automatic criteria?

And no, I am not a member of Wasp, I didn't join that for a reason. You left me positive trust for being 'such an asset to the community' to get me to join, then removed it when my views didn't align exactly with yours (or the other 50,000 chefs who all think their opinions can equally be integrated into ONE rating).

I suggested you go deal with WASP that seeing as you are the only person working on it and everyone wants to sell their shares. And yes, I am still on that mailing list, and yes, I have asked several times to be removed from it.

Chinese mining farms are crazy! It's so incredible... Why is it always that "The Chinese" are doing these things that seem to get totally out of proportion? If it comes to Bitcoin mining it is clear that you need to keep your costs down and it's purely margin hunting. But, wow still...

What do home miners have to compete with?

http://bitcoinagile.com/81AF6/inside-a-chinese-bitcoin-mine-the-coinsman_stream

You're right not recommending them (at least currently). I wouldn't say they're BFL, but definitely not recommend them to anyone interested in buying a new miner at the moment!!!

Can I get the link so I can read up on it?

Is it a straight up scam or have they delivered anything before?

Those are scrypt miners... I am not well enough informed about those and this is a BTC guide. Sorry won't be adding them or Alpha etc.

Hi Bicknellski,

you can add fibonnac.io to the list of unreputable manufacturers... It doesn't look like they will ever deliver, fortunately, I got a refund

Greetings,

deeneendo

The bottomline would you recommend anyone purchasing their units? I think you agree with me no you wouldn't.

At first I also thought that this is a tad extreme, but you really have to look how they continued to get worse and worse. They didn't meet their delivery promises, the miners seemed to be used. They tricked customers into new terms and also refused refunds. They used to be a very good manufacturer and a ray of light in this dark area, but it seems they've gone a long way since then!

I am not in competition with his version.

I am posting this as a guide to people who may not want to spend an inordinate time reading all the reasons why he arrived at a score and then ignore the consumers who have complained about company X or Y. Let me make it brutally clear that this is a biased guide that is CONSUMER CENTRIC not MANUFACTURER CENTRIC unlike his guide.  

Again it is always on the consumer to make the choice. I hope what I provide is the starting point for people to make a better informed decision. I don't know anyone with any time spent in these forums that is going to complain much about this "system" because I am willing to actually listen to people if they have concerns about my ratings and change them. Unlike those that think they have a system without bias or a personal skew. Don't take my word for it. Just go read his thread... plenty of justifiable complaints there.