Ant4
Ant4
R3 Resistance 3.92 1.011v top / 1.004v bottom
R66 Resistance 3.85 1.007v top / 1.000v bottom
R38 Resistance 3.89 1.006v top / 0.999v bottom
R52 Resistance 3.85 0.982v top / 0.976v bottom
R3 Resistance 3.91 1.000v top / 0.992v bottom
R66 Resistance 3.84 0.991v top / 0.984v bottom
R38 Resistance 3.98 1.020v top / 1.012v bottom
R52 Resistance 3.85 0.990v top / 0.984v bottom
Frequency = 350
Power Consumption = 293 watts
Roughly = 171.05 GH
15 Minute Error Rate = 3.4754098360655737704918032786885
-
Frequency = 325
Power Consumption = 273 watts
Roughly = 168.46 GH
45 Minute Error Rate = 0.21840130246594925147917245761029
I'd still like to see a 200-300 Frequency table with some different numbers in there. My first antminer runs with a super low HW error rate at 250, but horrible at 275, and I think I could bump it up a little bit.
Beaflag VonRathburg, excellent results and information. Instead of using the pencil-mod, I've chosen to add a 1/8w film resistor in parallel with the ones listed above. For instance adding a 10K ohm resistor creates a total resistance of 3.08k which drives the chips at .89v. But I too am seeing sporadic results with the hardware errors. I've ordered a number of other value film resistors from Mouser to play with this week (12K,14K,15K,16K,17K,18K,20K and 22K). I think the results you've posted for Antminer #4 are promising and that the chips enjoy being fed at least 1v.
The point of all this blather is I was wondering if you could run ANT 4 specifically at 275 and 250MHZ and post the results?
#option 'freq_value' '0a81' #275
#option 'chip_freq' '275'
#option 'timeout' '51'
#option 'freq_value' '0a01' #267M
#option 'chip_freq' '267'
#option 'timeout' '53'
#option 'freq_value' '0981' #250M
#option 'chip_freq' '250'
#option 'timeout' '56'
#option 'freq_value' '0901' #237M
#option 'freq_value' '237'
#option 'timeout' '59'
#option 'freq_value' '0881' #225M
#option 'chip_freq' '225'
#option 'timeout' '63'