I suppose that I already provided a bit of a response to OP in
the second half of my response post in his other thread entitled " A Guide for cryptocurrency newbies for overcoming FOMO."
It seems that part of the problem of OP, and also forum member who are accepting vague ass definitions and framing of the topics, then we get caught up in meaningless, gobbledy gook of conversations in which we have not sufficiently/adequately described the difference between bitcoin and crypto.
How are we going to overcome confusing and misleading information if we cannot even figure out ways to start out with a proper kind of framework. Once we get the framework more clear by either understanding bitcoin first, or at least recognizing and appreciating that some things apply to bitcoin but do not apply to shitcoins, and somethings apply to shitcoins and not to bitcoin, and sure there are some things that apply to both, but we would still need to know when.
So if we use the same dumb-ass vague meaningless and misleading language in which we lump all things together, as if there were even such a thing as "crypto." When people use the term crypto without describing what the fuck they are talking about, then they likely do not know what they are talking about.
Another thing might be the lack of necessity to actually have to waste any time and energies of doing any research on anything else, if we start with bitcoin and then work our way from there. How does this relate to bitcoin? Sure sometimes we can branch out to looking into shitcoins and shitcoin related projects, but if we at least first figure out what is bitcoin and then what things relate more to bitcoin or not, then at least we can develop some priorities, and perhaps even present the information better too.. once we understand the information better by putting it into a more clear framework in regards to its relation to bitcoin. .and stop parroting dumbass language ie crypto, unless you define and describe what you are talking about first... .then no problem to use the term if it is at least defined and described rather than just vaguely mentioned as if there was no heirarchy within the field, which is more or less king daddy first... and do I need to explain more?