Topic: Hacken ai IEO failed - page 5. (Read 2299 times)
I think listing on another exchange would solve that.. I really love the HackenAI project. It's a really solid cybersecurity project. With working business products for cyber security and a blockchain wallet too. I'll be following them closely and hope they learn from their mistake.
No, you can't conclude it failed. There other strategies the developers can take to make the project move on. Like planning another IEO is a different exchange. Some developers can even go ahead with the 18$ sold and source private funds to move ahead.
Some conclude that this project is failed. Before investing they must be updated on the community to see if they have alternative solution to improve the project. I hope there is an improvement that at least their is IEO successful and raise a good amount of money.
I belief with the eminence of the Hacken AI project, they be supposed to state at slightest expected for a honest middling exchange. It will say not simply certain the endeavor a right elevation haul up and a good deal looked-for publicity, it will take gotten additional hobby from investors and good thing their fundraising goals. However, each and every one isn't doom and gloom, they can launch a second chapter of IEO on a larger chat like kucoin and make the fascination and accept as true rear on stalk
Well that an IEO failed doesn't mean the end of a project, there are some project that people have tagged failed that has finally sucedded in paying people in thousands of dollars, I think the crypto world or the sucess of a project shouldn't be tagged to IEO. Just take a little time and go through and study the project first, i believe hacken will succeed
Their IEO didn't fail, they still sold 18% of the token and decided to list it at exchanges. Currently the price of HAI is $ 0.01 and its volume is 2BTC, this is a successful start for this project.
No, you can't conclude it failed. There other strategies the developers can take to make the project move on. Like planning another IEO is a different exchange. Some developers can even go ahead with the 18$ sold and source private funds to move ahead.
Well that an IEO failed doesn't mean the end of a project, there are some project that people have tagged failed that has finally sucedded in paying people in thousands of dollars, I think the crypto world or the sucess of a project shouldn't be tagged to IEO. Just take a little time and go through and study the project first, i believe hacken will succeed
Their IEO didn't fail, they still sold 18% of the token and decided to list it at exchanges. Currently the price of HAI is $ 0.01 and its volume is 2BTC, this is a successful start for this project.
Well that an IEO failed doesn't mean the end of a project, there are some project that people have tagged failed that has finally sucedded in paying people in thousands of dollars, I think the crypto world or the sucess of a project shouldn't be tagged to IEO. Just take a little time and go through and study the project first, i believe hacken will succeed
Their IEO didn't fail, they still sold 18% of the token and decided to list it at exchanges. Currently the price of HAI is $ 0.01 and its volume is 2BTC, this is a successful start for this project. 
This is really sad for a project to fail IEO but that doesn't mean it's the end of the project. I really do believe something good will certainly come out that if the team can decide and look for another alternative of to proceed with listing without having to pay for another IEO. It's so sad to see such.
We don't have the right to decide on the future of this project but if the group can list it at a big exchange then everyone will feel safer investing. Currently OceanEx is not an option but this exchange is still much better than other exchanges. Of course Hacken is still a good project but there are a lot of big problems so you need to consider carefully before deciding to invest in this project.
I scanned through their whitepaper, it's a big project with dedicated and experience team, they have been in bushiness for a long time now providing security for different projects and carrying out security audit. I don't think they may as well solely reply on the IEO fund but that would be an added advantage.
although like that but I'm sure they don't have experience in the cryptocurrency field so there are failures like this that ultimately make a lot of people disappointed, it's better if you aren't ready to launch the project then there's no need to make ico or ieo like that because that will only give a bad name for cryptocurrency.
This is really sad for a project to fail IEO but that doesn't mean it's the end of the project. I really do believe something good will certainly come out that if the team can decide and look for another alternative of to proceed with listing without having to pay for another IEO. It's so sad to see such.
I scanned through their whitepaper, it's a big project with dedicated and experience team, they have been in bushiness for a long time now providing security for different projects and carrying out security audit. I don't think they may as well solely reply on the IEO fund but that would be an added advantage.
I dont hacken is a failed.project, i know the ieo failed but the team keeps on working good updates about project including thier ios , and android app. We can only say a project become failed when they abandoned the team abandoned after the failed ieo,
What will happen to hacken ai now? The project planned for IEO on oceanX exchange, damn I did warned them about such exchanges, they only sold 18% of 100% tokens for the IEO in 24hrs, that's a big failure, any solution to this?
calm yourself, if you have already invested and bought their IEO privately, then it is bad, you better follow the IEO exchange, and buy it when they start there, as far as I know there is no IEO that is run for Hacken.AI in some exchanges now, but they are still active, so you can wait for it Hacken is looking good project but due to IEO n shit exchanges or low-rank exchanges will totally fail it so still, they have to decide and plan next rounds of IEO on one high-rank exchange.
You blame something without you knowing anything. Hacken held an IEO on OceanEx and it wasn't a shit exchange. OceanEx is a new exchange, created specifically for the VeChain ecosystem, and Hacken is one of them.Hacken is currently being traded at OceanEx, so there will be no further IEO.
In my opinion OceanEx is pretty good even though I only used this exchanger once to make transactions but there were no serious obstacles when using it. There is no IEO anymore because it has been traded on exchangers and traders or investors can trade directly
https://oceanex.pro/vi/trades/haibtc
It is already listed at the exchange, so I don't think this project fails like you said. Although they could not complete the IEO, the project was still developed and listed in the exchanges. Obviously, this project is much better than the projects that have completed 100% IEO
It is already listed at the exchange, so I don't think this project fails like you said. Although they could not complete the IEO, the project was still developed and listed in the exchanges. Obviously, this project is much better than the projects that have completed 100% IEO
This one should be listed in CMC soon, I think for a new project not listed in big exchange, having a 2 btc trading volume in 24 hours is already a good volume. I think there's a chance now that the volume will also increase since this exchange has over $50 million trading volume in total (24h).
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/oceanex/
Hacken is looking good project but due to IEO n shit exchanges or low-rank exchanges will totally fail it so still, they have to decide and plan next rounds of IEO on one high-rank exchange.
You blame something without you knowing anything. Hacken held an IEO on OceanEx and it wasn't a shit exchange. OceanEx is a new exchange, created specifically for the VeChain ecosystem, and Hacken is one of them.Hacken is currently being traded at OceanEx, so there will be no further IEO.
Hacken is looking good project but due to IEO n shit exchanges or low-rank exchanges will totally fail it so still, they have to decide and plan next rounds of IEO on one high-rank exchange.
I think IEO is not guaranteeing the project will be success in the future.
It is all depends on the project itself and where they list their IEO. Oceanx exchange is not a popular exchange, maybe that is one of the reasons why their IEO failed. The question is, what will they do now to keep the project on the plan ?
It is all depends on the project itself and where they list their IEO. Oceanx exchange is not a popular exchange, maybe that is one of the reasons why their IEO failed. The question is, what will they do now to keep the project on the plan ?
Really, this isn't an issue as many projects with such failure later bounced back to make the real boom for the project. Failure during IEO is some how a stepping stone to the right direction, This will always make the team project sit tight to make some positive move to give the project a new phase better than the former. As for me, nothing to be afraid about as there is still good chances of the project to succeed in the second round of it IEO. Well, always do your research before invest and invest what you can afford to lose.
It was their bad decision to do IEO on oceanex. But That doesn't mean the end of the project. They may start a new round on other good exchange.
This is true, as long as they are trying they can make something in the future. They can start new round,
they can learn from mistakes and do it better next time. But for that the team needs to stay active and keep
trying to achieve something great!
To be honest I never heard about oceanex exchange. The project managers should try to avoid some exchanges
and to try their best to make contacts with the best one, if they can't than they should wait and try again with
developed project, running to any exchange can hurt projects in the long-term.
Jump to: