Why arent we hearing more about this? It's pretty sad :/
Because it only gives headlines if its bitcoin related to make it look unsafe.and so we are more alert and wear a pretty good security
Topic: Hackers steal 300-900 million! - page 2. (Read 2402 times)
and so we are more alert and wear a pretty good security
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
My bet is XP, even though the official support stopped last year, still plenty of business's are using xp
I don't see how this could even remotely be good news for bitcoin. Banks cover such losses so their costumes lose nothing. It's ridiculously easy for a newbie to lose his bitcoins if he doesn't take proper steps to secure his wallet. I've been a bitcoin supporter for two years, I've yet to see a way that makes 'bank grade' security for storing bitcoin accessible to the average user.
One way of Bitcoin being more secure than fiat. Bank transfer requires you to key in information while connected to the internet. In Bitcoin, you can sign a raw TX on a offline computer and broadcast it on another online computer. If you use proper security procedures in Bitcoin, the chances of hack would be close to zero(Unless a bug in the wallet code is found).
If this were to be btc, all the negative news will start to pour in to make it look real bad. And talk about being fair
I wonder if Hong Kong will consider banning fiat now 
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
Some of the largest hacks in Bitcoin history have all involved services running on Linux. Security is a mindset not an OS. MtGox, BitStamp, Coinflor, MyBitcoin, Bitcoinica, Slush, the Bitcoin faucet (the original), etc. What did they all have in common? They all ran on Linux and they were all robbed blind.
Sure but they have more often than not involved poor password security, overall poor server security and not OS specific malware. Yes of course security is a mind set but it begins with picking the right OS. The types of attacks that targeted the banks and many hacking attacks involve planting malware on Windows desktop computers that is then used the steal credentials. These stolen credentials may actually be used to attack, a GNU/Linux server, but even in this case the fault lies with Microsoft Windows. This is possible not only due to both the design of Windows but also because of how Windows is marketed particularly to consumers. The latter is what makes possible the massive fertile ground of vulnerable Windows computers that allows Windows malware to breed. How many Windows computers are sold to consumers that treat security as an up sell? The economic incentives in propriety software distribution actually encourage the end user to seek the Internet for gratis alternatives. They also make it easy to install software on Windows, while forcing users and administrators to have to seek software from all over the Internet. I have seen very experienced Windows administrators get fooled into installing malware. The alternative to this malware cesspool that is provided by Apple and Microsoft is an Orwellian lockdown where only applications approved by big brother can run. This leads to yet another problem since it encourages users to break the security of the OS wide open to get the freedom they deserve.
Now compare this with GNU/Linux where users and administrators are provided with a trusted software repository with 99% of the software most users will need is available gratis. Getting software to run from outside the trusted repository is possible but nerdy. It invloves in many cases compiling the software from the source code. Even if an executable is available and it matches the right distribution it still involves manually changing a set of permissions on the executable file. So Joe novice tries to install a malware executable on GNU/Linux. The most likely result is that he gets an obscure error and contacts technical support who promptly sets him right.
Security is not just about the user or the OS, it is also about the entire ecosystem.
Edit: GNU/Linux is about source compatibility since it is designed for FLOSS. Microsoft Windows is about binary compatibility since it is designed for propriety software. Malware does not spread very well if it has to be compiled by hand.
O and has Turla actually been found infecting systems in the wild? According to the article quoted above apparently not
Quote
Although Linux variants from the Turla framework were known to exist, we haven't seen any in the wild yet.
I agree that Linux tends to be more secure than windows, but you are giving them too much credit.
http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/12/powerful-highly-stealthy-linux-trojan-may-have-infected-victims-for-years/
http://blog.norsecorp.com/2015/02/10/new-linux-backdoor-trojan-includes-sophisticated-payload/
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
Some of the largest hacks in Bitcoin history have all involved services running on Linux. Security is a mindset not an OS. MtGox, BitStamp, Coinflor, MyBitcoin, Bitcoinica, Slush, the Bitcoin faucet (the original), etc. What did they all have in common? They all ran on Linux and they were all robbed blind.
At least 2 of those were probably fake hacks where the owner ran away with large piles of digital money.
Your point about "Security is a mindset" is very valid.
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
Some of the largest hacks in Bitcoin history have all involved services running on Linux. Security is a mindset not an OS. MtGox, BitStamp, Coinflor, MyBitcoin, Bitcoinica, Slush Pool, the Bitcoin faucet (the original), etc. What did they all have in common? They all ran on Linux and they were all robbed blind.
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
Linux is more secure than windows typically , but your assumptions are dangerously wrong as all OS variants are effected...
http://threatpost.com/versatility-of-zeus-framework-encourages-criminal-innovation/106638
Quote
PLXsert says it expects further adaptations and enhancements of the Zeus malware toolkit, including hybrid payloads with other crimeware kits targeting multiple platforms, including Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, and iOS.
http://securelist.com/blog/research/67962/the-penquin-turla-2/
Quote
The newly discovered Turla sample is unusual in the fact that it's the first Turla sample targeting the Linux operating system that we have discovered.
There is no silver bullet. Good security is difficult and complex.
It is about risk mitigation pure and simple. Yes there exist a few proof of concept GNU/Linux malware. Now compare this with the literally millions of Windows malware in the wild. I do not claim that GNU/Linux is immune to malware but the risk factor is lower by many orders of magnitude.
O and has Turla actually been found infecting systems in the wild? According to the article quoted above apparently not
Quote
Although Linux variants from the Turla framework were known to exist, we haven't seen any in the wild yet.
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
Linux is more secure than windows typically , but your assumptions are dangerously wrong as all OS variants are effected...
http://threatpost.com/versatility-of-zeus-framework-encourages-criminal-innovation/106638
Quote
PLXsert says it expects further adaptations and enhancements of the Zeus malware toolkit, including hybrid payloads with other crimeware kits targeting multiple platforms, including Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, and iOS.
http://securelist.com/blog/research/67962/the-penquin-turla-2/
Quote
The newly discovered Turla sample is unusual in the fact that it's the first Turla sample targeting the Linux operating system that we have discovered.
There is no silver bullet. Good security is difficult and complex.
Why arent we hearing more about this? It's pretty sad :/
Because it only gives headlines if its bitcoin related to make it look unsafe.
The article is missing a critical fact. What operating system were the banks that were victimized running? My guess is that the operating system that was infected with malware was some version of Microsoft Windows. In this case the issue is no different than the many Bitcoin users who have had their Bitcoins stolen because the used the same operating system.
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
The real issue here is not Bitcoin vs fiat but rather the choice of Microsoft Windows over GNU/Linux that has made the banks victims in this case for the very same reason that many Bitcoin users have also been victimized
Why arent we hearing more about this? It's pretty sad :/
...Bitcoin unaffected.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/world/bank-hackers-steal-millions-via-malware.html?_r=1
When this happens with in the bitcoin economy, expect plenty of negative press... when it happens to traditional banks(as it happens all the time) expect a few articles and little to no criticism. When it happens to a bitcoin exchange, only the users are affected, when it happens to banks expect them to band together with corrupt states and not disclose who was effected and expect them all to be "insured" and "compensated" and everyone will be forced to pay. No CEO's will lose their jobs and no banks will fail due to weak security as they are all too big to fail and their poor security will be paid by you whether you know it or not.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/world/bank-hackers-steal-millions-via-malware.html?_r=1
Quote
In a report to be published on Monday, and provided in advance to The New York Times, Kaspersky Lab says that the scope of this attack on more than 100 banks and other financial institutions in 30 nations could make it one of the largest bank thefts ever — and one conducted without the usual signs of robbery.
When this happens with in the bitcoin economy, expect plenty of negative press... when it happens to traditional banks(as it happens all the time) expect a few articles and little to no criticism. When it happens to a bitcoin exchange, only the users are affected, when it happens to banks expect them to band together with corrupt states and not disclose who was effected and expect them all to be "insured" and "compensated" and everyone will be forced to pay. No CEO's will lose their jobs and no banks will fail due to weak security as they are all too big to fail and their poor security will be paid by you whether you know it or not.
Quote
The silence around the investigation appears motivated in part by the reluctance of banks to concede that their systems were so easily penetrated, and in part by the fact that the attacks appear to be continuing.
Jump to: