Yep. Some among us are younger than I. A nice graphic may have an impact as a reminder...
It's kind of a pretty deceptive reminder though.
First, it's questionable to what degree those really are Communist countries, and not simply Authoritarian State Capitalist or State Socialist countries. Then, the article should probably point out that the first famine in China it mentions occurred during its Republic, in a phase of civil war, and with World War Two going on in the background. But even if you don't want to bother with those details, then what about, for example, Amartya Sen's work, that studied mortality rates from 1949 to 1979, in India and China? His work not only shows China had a drastic reduction in mortality rates, starting in 1949 (due to its "communist" reforms, when the People's Republic of China was created), but goes further to state India could have saved something like 3.8 million people a year if it had the same mortality rates as China - that is, Communist China probably saved over 100 million lives when compared to Democratic Capitalist India. Is that anywhere in the comparison the article is making? Or the studies that show the increase in China's mortality rate starting in 1979 (when its "capitalist" reforms started)?
It's fine if you don't like Communism (there's certainly a lot of valid critics to be made), but that article is just silly.