Pages:
Author

Topic: Has an exchange ever blocked your Bitcoins from Signature earnings? - page 2. (Read 314 times)

copper member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 4101
Top Crypto Casino


Is there any documented case about this? I have doubt any exchange care the funds comes from service which spam this forum.



No there is nothing.

What the guy is saying is pure fantasy full of shit

Beside blockhain forensic tools, imagine if CEXs have to scroll the web to monitor spams... what is their definition of "spam", after how many messages it is consedered as such. Who they're to decide on a manipulation? That's not their job..

The guy is definitely a troll. I fell out of my chair
hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 880
Notify wallet transaction @txnNotifierBot
In our local board. A local exchange in my country coins.ph blocked a deposit that came from casino. It’s not directly from campaign payment but he send the funds from his wallet to casino then send the balance from casino to exchange wallet which caused the problem since our local exchange refunded the balance to the sender wallet which is the hot wallet of the casino.

I know that this is somehow related to your concern since you are assuming that funds from campaign is came from casino. I believed some exchange doesn’t allowed deposit came from casino balance since some of their address is sanctioned by exchange.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinsph-incoming-transaction-rejected-5423879
The linked thread is not related to casino to exchange transaction but it was from yobit to coins.ph transaction which was a russian based exchange and the wallet is considered as sanctioned wallet address although coins.ph also prohibits such transaction (casino to coins).
I replied on how coins.ph can refund his coins including the required details and where to send the details, but looks like it was ignored by OP for some reason.
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 623
I am just trying to know from forum members if there is anyone who has ever had their bitcoin payments from signature advertising get blocked by an exchange, citing "suspicious transaction"?

What was/would be your course of action if they asked for source of funds or proof of source of funds, especially if you were dealing with payments from a bitcoin casino or bitcoin mixing platform (since most CEXs seems to be no so friendly with bitcoins from such platforms) ?

In our local board. A local exchange in my country coins.ph blocked a deposit that came from casino. It’s not directly from campaign payment but he send the funds from his wallet to casino then send the balance from casino to exchange wallet which caused the problem since our local exchange refunded the balance to the sender wallet which is the hot wallet of the casino.

I know that this is somehow related to your concern since you are assuming that funds from campaign is came from casino. I believed some exchange doesn’t allowed deposit came from casino balance since some of their address is sanctioned by exchange.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinsph-incoming-transaction-rejected-5423879
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 617
As far as I recall, I used the exchange deposit address for every bitcoin I got from this forum and never had a problem though. I also haven't KYC yet.

Exchanges may block transactions from signature earnings on Bitcointalk because they are often associated with spam and manipulation. Many individuals participate in signature campaigns on the forum in order to earn small amounts of Bitcoin by posting on the forum with an advertisement for a specific project or service in their signature. Some people may abuse this system by creating multiple accounts and posting spam in order to earn more Bitcoin, which can negatively affect the reputation of the project or service being advertised.
I just realized that there is an exchange taking action against cheating behavior on bitcointalk. Btw, who usually reports it, and in what way?

The Theory they see is that the coins get out from the mixer going to the exchange which the exchange blocks it. If what they are saying is true, I think the possibility that your coins coming from DEX might also get blocked one day.

What exchanges might require soon is that coins going into them must have come from a regulated platform or wallet. Whether it comes from a casino or mixer campaign, they might just ask casinos KYC all even those with a small amount of BTC in thier account.
hero member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 680
Signature designer - start @$10 - PM me!
As far as I recall, I used the exchange deposit address for every bitcoin I got from this forum and never had a problem though. I also haven't KYC yet.

Exchanges may block transactions from signature earnings on Bitcointalk because they are often associated with spam and manipulation. Many individuals participate in signature campaigns on the forum in order to earn small amounts of Bitcoin by posting on the forum with an advertisement for a specific project or service in their signature. Some people may abuse this system by creating multiple accounts and posting spam in order to earn more Bitcoin, which can negatively affect the reputation of the project or service being advertised.
I just realized that there is an exchange taking action against cheating behavior on bitcointalk. Btw, who usually reports it, and in what way?
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
I have sent money from the ChipMixer’s campaign directly from my original address to Binance, Kraken, FTX (before it went puff), and several brazillian exchanges all the time. I’ve NEVER had issues. Never was questioned, had a deposit delayed, emails asking where the money came from, etc…
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 745
🌀 Cosmic Casino
I can't remember if this has happened or not to me. But I've read before that exchanges are strict if the funds where directly sent from a casino/mixer to their (exchange) address.
So, I think this varies from the exchange where someone sends his signature earnings if he's a participant of a casino signature campaign like directly from that casino account to the exchange. If it's on their T&C then that's already the rule. I don't know how they track but it's possible that they've got the sending address put into blacklist and recorded if ever they've made a test.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
Never happened to me, although when i use CEX i prefer local exchange which might be less strict compared with international ones.

Some people may abuse this system by creating multiple accounts and posting spam in order to earn more Bitcoin, which can negatively affect the reputation of the project or service being advertised. As a result, exchanges may block transactions from these earnings as a precautionary measure to prevent potential fraud or scams.

Is there any documented case about this? I have doubt any exchange care the funds comes from service which spam this forum.

3. Technical issues: Transactions may be blocked if the exchange is experiencing technical difficulties or if there is a problem with the transaction itself.

There shouldn't be any problem the transaction itself since in general Bitcoin transaction is either,
1. Invalid transaction, which cannot be broadcasted to node/miner.
2. Valid transaction, with specific amount of confirmation.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1789
Never experience it myself, even though I participated in various campaigns in the past (most of them were mixers). I never mix my coins and just sent them directly to my preferred exchange, but things might change depending on their policies. If they ask for personal details more than necessary, I might use a DEX or do P2P if I need to convert my earnings to fiat.

Things might change if my government or the government where the exchange is legalized requires an exchange to block mixer transactions though, they might look for popular addresses and then block any tx related to that address. Either way, I think you can still mix or use coinjoin or just use other exchanges. CMIIW.

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 4795
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Just use noncustodial wallet to receive coins of a signature campaign. But I have people that have no issue till today and they use exchange address directly. Even as there is no issue, I will advice you to use noncustodial wallet for it.
staff
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6152
This actually happened to me a few years back with Bitonic (BTC to fiat) and I think I talked about it here before, but I can't remember with which campaign I was at the time.

This was their email after I mentioned that the funds were coming from a signature campaign:

Quote
Thank you for your message. We would like to receive the Google spreadshoots (and the address) you're talking about. I think that would be sufficient to process your suspended and future transactions.

IIRC, this happened back when KYC was not required (for selling only) so, I don't think this had anything to do with the transaction being suspicious. It was probably a procedure they had to follow with all of their customers.
hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 880
Notify wallet transaction @txnNotifierBot
Never did. Although, i always use my non-custodial wallet to send to the exchange not directly from any platform (e.g. gambling) to the exchange, for prevention purposes.

What i actually think the reason why you ask this is because you are in a mixer campaign, well, same as mine.   Tongue

We will see then when i receive the payment from the campaign since it will be directly from coinomize to my non-custodial wallet then to exchange later on.
copper member
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1837
🌀 Cosmic Casino
I am just trying to know from forum members if there is anyone who has ever had their bitcoin payments from signature advertising get blocked by an exchange, citing "suspicious transaction"?

What was/would be your course of action if they asked for source of funds or proof of source of funds, especially if you were dealing with payments from a bitcoin casino or bitcoin mixing platform (since most CEXs seems to be no so friendly with bitcoins from such platforms) ?
Pages:
Jump to: