How does that price drop correspond in time to the BM1385 announcements?
Dang, don't you hate it when reason intrudes on a good joke?
9-)
Topic: Has something happened to antpool? (Read 1960 times)
Be aware that the hacker is trying to log on multiple platform.
I have 2FA and did change all my password but be careful.
Here is the ip of the person that try to connect to my account.
37.215.79.208
Could it be the fake S5+ website guys selleing gear ?
they are closer to normal
on 8-25 they made 13 blocks
on 8-26 they made 15 blocks
on 8-27 they made 19 blocks
23 is pretty normal for them
Could it be the fake S5+ website guys selleing gear ?
Still with loss
block 371389 ฿ 2.75170426 2015-08-25 00:43:01
block 371742 ฿ 2.73472555 2015-08-27 11:23:52
block 371389 ฿ 2.75170426 2015-08-25 00:43:01
block 371742 ฿ 2.73472555 2015-08-27 11:23:52
I was also wondering why my hashnest where not paying normally. Hope this is only some switch to more S5 or even the new S7 
well
aug 25 only 13 blocks
aug 26 only 14 blocks
aug 27 so far 6 blocks should be more like 9 or 10 at the ⅓ of a day mark
https://blockchain.info/blocks/AntPool
I was also wondering why my hashnest where not paying normally. Hope this is only some switch to more S5 or even the new S7
should i switch my gear on antpool from PPLNS to PPS? makes me wonder what is going on as well.
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything so i stuck with PPLNS
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything so i stuck with PPLNS
You can always switch it and then go back. PPS is nice on day's like that don't have big bumps in mining.
Antpool is also the lowest I think as far as percentage for PPS.
AFAIK Antpool doesn't pay TX fees to miners, which could be 0.5-1% - keep that in mind comparing to other pools.
should i switch my gear on antpool from PPLNS to PPS? makes me wonder what is going on as well.
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything so i stuck with PPLNS
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything so i stuck with PPLNS
You can always switch it and then go back. PPS is nice on day's like that don't have big bumps in mining.
Antpool is also the lowest I think as far as percentage for PPS.
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything
What kind of reasoning is that?its the simple minded folk reasoning
bigger hashrate generally would mean steady blocks found, but theres always variance and luck. 
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything
What kind of reasoning is that?
should i switch my gear on antpool from PPLNS to PPS? makes me wonder what is going on as well.
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything so i stuck with PPLNS
ive always figured antpool was so big it wouldnt need to worry about anything so i stuck with PPLNS
Over 24 hours antpool/hashnest is running at a loss . The results of 100x S5 in hashnest
yesterday
block 371389 ฿ 2.75170426 block4 2015-08-25 00:43:01
block 371483 ฿ 2.50750336 block9
today
block 371532 ฿ 2.66259399 block1
block 371536 ฿ 2.7329301 block3
block 371578 ฿ 2.63788988 block5
block 371591 ฿ 2.74251065 block8
block 371618 ฿ 2.65859195 block 9 2015-08-26 15:28:42
yesterday
block 371389 ฿ 2.75170426 block4 2015-08-25 00:43:01
block 371483 ฿ 2.50750336 block9
today
block 371532 ฿ 2.66259399 block1
block 371536 ฿ 2.7329301 block3
block 371578 ฿ 2.63788988 block5
block 371591 ฿ 2.74251065 block8
block 371618 ฿ 2.65859195 block 9 2015-08-26 15:28:42
This is one reason I like owning the gear. I can use antpool at PPS. So find a block or not I still get paid.
The current luck for pool is like 54 percent - https://www.antpool.com/poolStats.htm . So it does happen on dry spells but normally antpool is so big it does not hit that bad. So makes me wonder what happened.
The current luck for pool is like 54 percent - https://www.antpool.com/poolStats.htm . So it does happen on dry spells but normally antpool is so big it does not hit that bad. So makes me wonder what happened.
See the effect that Phil has??? 
While it is quite unlikely, it certainly falls within the realm of possibility that AntPool could have gone for over 10 hours without finding a block. Of course, it's also just as likely that they tried to do something like change their pool's coinbase sig and just completely screwed the pooch.
Like it was written just above me, Bitmain is not known for its transparency.
While it is quite unlikely, it certainly falls within the realm of possibility that AntPool could have gone for over 10 hours without finding a block. Of course, it's also just as likely that they tried to do something like change their pool's coinbase sig and just completely screwed the pooch.
Like it was written just above me, Bitmain is not known for its transparency.
well they made a few now so back to normal
371492 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 19:49:57
371490 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 19:16:42
371488 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 18:45:05
371487 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 18:44:01
371483 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 18:28:29
371476 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 16:37:49
^^^^^^^^^
10 hours 26 mins a 554,000,000,000 shares vs 50,000,000,000 shares big gap Maybe .999 cdf
vvvvvvvv
371425 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 06:11:48
See the effect that Phil has???
While it is quite unlikely, it certainly falls within the realm of possibility that AntPool could have gone for over 10 hours without finding a block. Of course, it's also just as likely that they tried to do something like change their pool's coinbase sig and just completely screwed the pooch.
Like it was written just above me, Bitmain is not known for its transparency.
While it is quite unlikely, it certainly falls within the realm of possibility that AntPool could have gone for over 10 hours without finding a block. Of course, it's also just as likely that they tried to do something like change their pool's coinbase sig and just completely screwed the pooch.
Like it was written just above me, Bitmain is not known for its transparency.
I GUESS the pen (keyboard) is mightier then the sword!
I have a lot in hashnest so I am upset.
They made a block after 584,347,818,850 shares
371476 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 16:37:49
371425 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 06:11:48
a 10 hour 26 minute wait! this was a cdf of .999
Look at what you did (edit: Hashnest S5 trading):
I have a lot in hashnest so I am upset.
They made a block after 584,347,818,850 shares
371476 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 16:37:49
371425 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 06:11:48
a 10 hour 26 minute wait! this was a cdf of .999
9 hours and counting!
Look at what you did (edit: Hashnest S5 trading):
I'm not in as deep as you but am a bit miffed also. The amount of time just seems a bit to much to be bad luck. We will never know, to say Bitmain has a lack of transparency would be an understatement.
I GUESS the pen (keyboard) is mightier then the sword!
I have a lot in hashnest so I am upset.
They made a block after 584,347,818,850 shares
371476 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 16:37:49
371425 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 06:11:48
a 10 hour 26 minute wait! this was a cdf of .999
Look at what you did (edit: Hashnest S5 trading):
I have a lot in hashnest so I am upset.
They made a block after 584,347,818,850 shares
371476 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 16:37:49
371425 (Main Chain) 2015-08-25 06:11:48
a 10 hour 26 minute wait! this was a cdf of .999
9 hours and counting!
Look at what you did (edit: Hashnest S5 trading):
9 hours and counting!
Look at what you did (edit: Hashnest S5 trading):
Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image
It is interesting that if you look they lost around 5 PH in a day on last block shown. That could be temporary. But that is a lot to lose to variance.
that is 9 hours and 17 minutes ago.
You are correct sorry about that I am wrong. I can say I have PPS on that pool on some miners and it's still getting paid.
Is anyone based on blocks still getting payment showing it going up?
Hashnest S5 (PPLNS) last paid block is 371425 (the one ~9 hours ago) as far as I can see in my transaction history.
Keep in mind the time zones when looking at the payouts. Timestamps are UTC I think.
Jump to: