Topic: Has theymos ever banned any signature campaign due to spam? - page 2. (Read 426 times)

Well how inappropriate, it's seem you are really desperate to bang a job with stake.com because I know very well that this is due to the queenvera issue and also your desperate attempt to be noticed by the stake.com team and since you have ignored, you now feel its right to come outright that some penalty be given to the whole campaign? Isn't?

Well you can try, but to clear you the stake team would never need your so called managerial skills and not to say you are probably one of the forum worse campaign manager (and your friend@shemale of the forum). Some of you Manager's are so full yourself feeling you can do a better job than what stake is already offering. Well there is no doubt that the user Queenvera has to be penalized for the abrupt rubbish that he did but coming out for the whole campaign is something else.

Little mouse why don't you clean your own buttocks before seeking to clean others, because you are not a saint in hiring full time shitposters yourself, I mean it's very clear that the forum now is filled with these so called shitposters but that doesn't mean you haven't hiring users that are also quality posters or can you boldly claim that you haven't hired any user who turned out to be banned or tag after or was working on your managed campaigns?.

So far from what I have seen here  you can actually count out any signature campaign from having one or two spammers on their list not even the ones painted with so much glamour.

I think that to ban the company or campaign, it would be necessary for the company or campaign to be the one promoting this spam situation.

Fortunately, I think all campaigns have promoted contrary ideas. Except for those campaigns that want to see posts in gaming and gambling locations. However, this is another level of the issue, which is not generalized throughout the forum, and is concentrated in a specific place in the forum, prepared for this purpose.

Therefore, if things do not change much from what has been happening, it is not something that will happen.

This is a good topic for discussion, and base on my knowledge about how signature campaign works her on this forum, I think spam regulation is a work which ought to be done by the campaign manager, and not the campaign itself. Hence, if a campaign is noticed to have much spammers than quality posters, then the manager is ought to be blame, and not the campaign itself, because the aim/objectives of signature campaigns is to get exposure, whereas that of signature managers is to operate according to the forum standard of spam elimination. Hence, if a signature campaign is noticed to have lots of spammers, then the campaign manager is to be blame and warned.

It could probably be because of QueenVera which was caught with massive spamming recently. I do not know but this could be close to it because it was known in less than 24 hours from when I posted this and what I could think of.

What that I know is that there are spammers and those that plagiarized contents that are seen in many campaigns but which the campaign manager will later remove or which the forum will ban.

When people complained on an unfair ban on Yobit, hilariousandco explained that if they repeat their free, automatic campaign, without representative to manage their campaign on the forum, they and their participants can be banned a long time.


Why did you ask this Little_Mouse?

Any spam campaign in your thinking that needs to be temporary banned as a warning to wake their managers and participants up and need better management?

Each person has a different definition of spam. Each manager is different as well. You've hired spammers, I've hired spammers, everyone has had a few. Just report the posts you feel are spam and if they see enough reports, i'm sure the hammer will drop on some participants. If enough get banned a warning might be sent to the company before any bans happen to them.

I really don't think trying to get a company banned is a good thing though. Last resort maybe, but def not the 1st step IMO.

Here's the post, but I don't know exactly on that time.

There was a chaos in yobit.net signature campaign as far as I can remember but were they banned here? I can't remember.
Has it ever happened that due to spamming, theymos banned any signature?