Hash Rate Low on GTX660? | Bitcointalksearch.org

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: BeetcoinScummer on November 25, 2014, 09:02:30 PM

Quote from: ^BuTcH^ on November 25, 2014, 04:05:24 PM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 25, 2014, 04:04:24 PM

Quote from: Samsun6 on November 24, 2014, 09:24:30 PM

Quote from: odolvlobo on November 24, 2014, 09:18:02 PM

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

Assuming the current difficulty of 40300030328, 1 GH/s mines 0.00001248 BTC per day. The most efficient GPU I could find uses about 0.333 kW per GH/s. Assuming a power cost of $0.10 per kWh, 1 GH/s costs $0.80 per day.

In order for the GPU to break even, 1 BTC would have to be worth $64,102.56, so $30k was not a bad guess.

wow $64,102.56 maybe 100 years later will touch that price lol

ahahahaha

100Years!!!!

this make me ROTFL!!!

really change your life!!!

... and just in 100 years

Grin

Maybe is better to mine with an old 3dfx Voodoo2 card

nVidia RIVA 128!

hum!!!
i remeber good perfo with OLD MGA Matrox!!!

Grin

BeetcoinScummer

full member

Activity: 215

Merit: 101

Quote from: ^BuTcH^ on November 25, 2014, 04:05:24 PM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 25, 2014, 04:04:24 PM

Quote from: Samsun6 on November 24, 2014, 09:24:30 PM

Quote from: odolvlobo on November 24, 2014, 09:18:02 PM

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

Assuming the current difficulty of 40300030328, 1 GH/s mines 0.00001248 BTC per day. The most efficient GPU I could find uses about 0.333 kW per GH/s. Assuming a power cost of $0.10 per kWh, 1 GH/s costs $0.80 per day.

In order for the GPU to break even, 1 BTC would have to be worth $64,102.56, so $30k was not a bad guess.

wow $64,102.56 maybe 100 years later will touch that price lol

ahahahaha

100Years!!!!

this make me ROTFL!!!

really change your life!!!

... and just in 100 years

Grin

Maybe is better to mine with an old 3dfx Voodoo2 card

nVidia RIVA 128!

^BuTcH^

full member

Activity: 671

Merit: 103

Moni

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 25, 2014, 04:04:24 PM

Quote from: Samsun6 on November 24, 2014, 09:24:30 PM

Quote from: odolvlobo on November 24, 2014, 09:18:02 PM

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

Assuming the current difficulty of 40300030328, 1 GH/s mines 0.00001248 BTC per day. The most efficient GPU I could find uses about 0.333 kW per GH/s. Assuming a power cost of $0.10 per kWh, 1 GH/s costs $0.80 per day.

In order for the GPU to break even, 1 BTC would have to be worth $64,102.56, so $30k was not a bad guess.

wow $64,102.56 maybe 100 years later will touch that price lol

ahahahaha

100Years!!!!

this make me ROTFL!!!

really change your life!!!

... and just in 100 years

Grin

Maybe is better to mine with an old 3dfx Voodoo2 card

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Samsun6 on November 24, 2014, 09:24:30 PM

Quote from: odolvlobo on November 24, 2014, 09:18:02 PM

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

Assuming the current difficulty of 40300030328, 1 GH/s mines 0.00001248 BTC per day. The most efficient GPU I could find uses about 0.333 kW per GH/s. Assuming a power cost of $0.10 per kWh, 1 GH/s costs $0.80 per day.

In order for the GPU to break even, 1 BTC would have to be worth $64,102.56, so $30k was not a bad guess.

wow $64,102.56 maybe 100 years later will touch that price lol

ahahahaha

100Years!!!!

this make me ROTFL!!!

really change your life!!!

... and just in 100 years

Grin

orsotheysaid

full member

Activity: 153

Merit: 100

AMD is way better, if you really want to mine you should sell the card and then get an AMD one and use cgminer. If not, cudaminer is your friend but I dont expect much at this point.

Samsun6

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

Quote from: odolvlobo on November 24, 2014, 09:18:02 PM

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

Assuming the current difficulty of 40300030328, 1 GH/s mines 0.00001248 BTC per day. The most efficient GPU I could find uses about 0.333 kW per GH/s. Assuming a power cost of $0.10 per kWh, 1 GH/s costs $0.80 per day.

In order for the GPU to break even, 1 BTC would have to be worth $64,102.56, so $30k was not a bad guess.

wow $64,102.56 maybe 100 years later will touch that price lol

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

Assuming the current difficulty of 40300030328, 1 GH/s mines 0.00001248 BTC per day. The most efficient GPU I could find uses about 0.333 kW per GH/s. Assuming a power cost of $0.10 per kWh, 1 GH/s costs $0.80 per day.

In order for the GPU to break even, 1 BTC would have to be worth $64,102.56, so $30k was not a bad guess.

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: FUR11 on November 22, 2014, 10:13:25 AM

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

sure!!!
bitcoin price it is for sure another variable to add to get the right date on ROI ...
but price it is not sure...
so.. if one of the variable is not sure... the result is not sure!!

and the ROI go far and much more far!!!!

FUR11

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

FURring bitcoin up since 1762

Let's do the math for a minute: How high would the Bitcoin price have to go that mining with such a GPU still made sense, if we assume a constant price of BTC? If I had to make a guess... I think $30k maybe?

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: ranochigo on November 22, 2014, 09:31:44 AM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 22, 2014, 09:15:01 AM

Quote from: ranochigo on November 22, 2014, 05:34:59 AM

Quote from: Salmon1989 on November 22, 2014, 04:59:46 AM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 21, 2014, 05:24:44 AM

i know who there are cudaminer software for nVidia 750 Ti with really good performance and with kHash/Watt greater than miner for AMD.

I was too late to try GPU mining, but I always heard that nvidia sucks badly. Which software and coin are you talking about here?

He's talking about this (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cudaminer-ccminer-cuda-based-mining-applications-windowslinuxmacosx-167229). Nvidia sucks on their previous chip architecture for mining but after the introduction of Maxwell architecture, the performance have improved greatly on the power used per mh.

sure..
i think now the best choise it is cudaMiner with nVidia 750Ti..
this GPU are cheap and low power consumption...
you could read something about the new nVidia 970 and 980.
They are the 750 big btother with MaxWell core.
But i do not know so much about mining power...

Well, your choice is incorrect.
AMD's R9 290 is lower in price and better in performance, based on the power usage and performance of each card. Both of the cards cannot beat R9 290 in the performace and price.

sure... radeon 290 it is better in performance...

but if you consider hash rate power, cost and power consumption??
who is the winner???
i think 750 ti it is a good choise...
and when you want to resell it is much more newest and you will be able to sell better!!!

ranochigo

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 4418

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 22, 2014, 09:15:01 AM

Quote from: ranochigo on November 22, 2014, 05:34:59 AM

Quote from: Salmon1989 on November 22, 2014, 04:59:46 AM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 21, 2014, 05:24:44 AM

i know who there are cudaminer software for nVidia 750 Ti with really good performance and with kHash/Watt greater than miner for AMD.

I was too late to try GPU mining, but I always heard that nvidia sucks badly. Which software and coin are you talking about here?

He's talking about this (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cudaminer-ccminer-cuda-based-mining-applications-windowslinuxmacosx-167229). Nvidia sucks on their previous chip architecture for mining but after the introduction of Maxwell architecture, the performance have improved greatly on the power used per mh.

sure..
i think now the best choise it is cudaMiner with nVidia 750Ti..
this GPU are cheap and low power consumption...
you could read something about the new nVidia 970 and 980.
They are the 750 big btother with MaxWell core.
But i do not know so much about mining power...

Well, your choice is incorrect.
AMD's R9 290 is lower in price and better in performance, based on the power usage and performance of each card. Both of the cards cannot beat R9 290 in the performace and price.

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: ranochigo on November 22, 2014, 05:34:59 AM

Quote from: Salmon1989 on November 22, 2014, 04:59:46 AM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 21, 2014, 05:24:44 AM

i know who there are cudaminer software for nVidia 750 Ti with really good performance and with kHash/Watt greater than miner for AMD.

I was too late to try GPU mining, but I always heard that nvidia sucks badly. Which software and coin are you talking about here?

He's talking about this (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cudaminer-ccminer-cuda-based-mining-applications-windowslinuxmacosx-167229). Nvidia sucks on their previous chip architecture for mining but after the introduction of Maxwell architecture, the performance have improved greatly on the power used per mh.

sure..
i think now the best choise it is cudaMiner with nVidia 750Ti..
this GPU are cheap and low power consumption...
you could read something about the new nVidia 970 and 980.
They are the 750 big btother with MaxWell core.
But i do not know so much about mining power...

ranochigo

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 4418

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: Salmon1989 on November 22, 2014, 04:59:46 AM

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 21, 2014, 05:24:44 AM

i know who there are cudaminer software for nVidia 750 Ti with really good performance and with kHash/Watt greater than miner for AMD.

I was too late to try GPU mining, but I always heard that nvidia sucks badly. Which software and coin are you talking about here?

He's talking about this (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cudaminer-ccminer-cuda-based-mining-applications-windowslinuxmacosx-167229). Nvidia sucks on their previous chip architecture for mining but after the introduction of Maxwell architecture, the performance have improved greatly on the power used per mh.

Salmon1989

hero member

Activity: 603

Merit: 500

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 21, 2014, 05:24:44 AM

i know who there are cudaminer software for nVidia 750 Ti with really good performance and with kHash/Watt greater than miner for AMD.

I was too late to try GPU mining, but I always heard that nvidia sucks badly. Which software and coin are you talking about here?

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: ranochigo on November 18, 2014, 09:37:30 AM

Even with undervolt, overclocking, your hashrate will still be low. Cuda cores aren't optimized for openCL operations compared to steam cores which AMD uses.

i quote it!!!

but it depend prom miner code too...
i know who there are cudaminer software for nVidia 750 Ti with really good performance and with kHash/Watt greater than miner for AMD.

ranochigo

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 4418

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: zlatanBorec on November 18, 2014, 09:26:35 AM

you need to undervolt your GPU and tweak a little bit...
you need to download, edit&modify, upload bios to drive down power consumption and rise performance!!!

Even with undervolt, overclocking, your hashrate will still be low. Cuda cores aren't optimized for openCL operations compared to steam cores which AMD uses. However, with the recent released GTX 980 and 970, their hashrates and electrical usage are slightly improved but for SHA256, the profitability is still negative due to the amount of ASICs on the market right now. For altcoins, there MIGHT be bits of profit but the profit would still be small

zlatanBorec

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

you need to undervolt your GPU and tweak a little bit...
you need to download, edit&modify, upload bios to drive down power consumption and rise performance!!!

Simon8x

hero member

Activity: 568

Merit: 500

Quote from: deemac on November 16, 2014, 06:14:08 PM

im reading up on all these forums and watching videos on how to set up mining rigs. a lot of people have been talking about setting up systems with multiple high end radeon cards such as the 290x etc...

but when they talk about the hash rate being achieved, its like 300-400 kilo hash /s (for each card).

They are most likely talking about litecoin (scrypt algo) hashing rate. https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison

Quote from: deemac on November 16, 2014, 06:14:08 PM

yet i did a test run on my laptop where my nvidia gtx660m card is achieving 40 mega hash/s on average.

why is my laptp achieving mh/s when these dedicated rigs are only achieving kh/s?

am i missing something? because im really confused here

And you are testing with bitcoin (sha256 algo) hashing rate. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparison

AleCrypt0

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 500

Quote from: deemac on November 16, 2014, 06:14:08 PM

hi guys,

im reading up on all these forums and watching videos on how to set up mining rigs. a lot of people have been talking about setting up systems with multiple high end radeon cards such as the 290x etc...

but when they talk about the hash rate being achieved, its like 300-400 kilo hash /s (for each card).

yet i did a test run on my laptop where my nvidia gtx660m card is achieving 40 mega hash/s on average.

why is my laptp achieving mh/s when these dedicated rigs are only achieving kh/s?

am i missing something? because im really confused here

Maybe try to check Mining section of this forum.

It could clear your doubts and questions very probably.

Cheers.

deemac

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

hi guys,

im reading up on all these forums and watching videos on how to set up mining rigs. a lot of people have been talking about setting up systems with multiple high end radeon cards such as the 290x etc...

but when they talk about the hash rate being achieved, its like 300-400 kilo hash /s (for each card).

yet i did a test run on my laptop where my nvidia gtx660m card is achieving 40 mega hash/s on average.

why is my laptp achieving mh/s when these dedicated rigs are only achieving kh/s?

am i missing something? because im really confused here

Topic: Hash Rate Low on GTX660? (Read 34717 times)