Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 106. (Read 880461 times)

I agree that the forum is not the correct venue to discuss the reorganisation... Or liquidation. But I want to try my best anyway, while I don't feel like a little creditor at all, I'm not in the high end circle, so while I would like to help, I'm actually useless.
At least spamming the oblivious here I can make sure that people read it... At least that's the plan.

I agree that the forum is not the correct venue to discuss the reorganisation... Or liquidation. But I want to try my best anyway, while I don't feel like a little creditor at all, I'm not in the high end circle, so while I would like to help, I'm actually useless.
At least spamming the oblivious here I can make sure that people read it... At least that's the plan.

Unfortunately that is the way of the biggest investor has the biggest say world we live in.

To be honest each creditor no matter the size should have equal representation and the decisions made should reflect the consensus not the will of the largest parties contesting this. Anything you post Cedivad or other "small" creditors post should be heard and should be valued equally with the other views. That would be the ideal situation.

I agree that the forum is not the correct venue to discuss the reorganisation... Or liquidation. But I want to try my best anyway, while I don't feel like a little creditor at all, I'm not in the high end circle, so while I would like to help, I'm actually useless.
At least spamming the oblivious here I can make sure that people read it... At least that's the plan.

Here is how you should proceed.

Open your minds up to any all opportunities to push out working boards or flood the market with a large number of chips at lower than market rate. Seek guidance and support so that you can build a team that can push those chips into working miners.

You can't seriously be deciding what is best here in this forum. You actually have to have all the parties in one room and be open to the idea of finding that solution where the chips are made into miners with compromise being the operative word. Failing an agreement you are left with diving up everything including the IP to pay back creditors.

If I were a creditor I would look at taking shares in HF as part payment if there was a solid team and investors in place moving forward. Out of this though you obviously need to get rid of the malignant parts that caused this debacle. We know who they are and that decision making power needs to be permanently removed their hands moving forward as soon as you have a viable entity if that is you want HF to continue.

Gloat about what?  Being an idiot?

actually being proven right, and you arguing with me calling me a shill the whole time shows that you have no right to speak, you are a complete fucking tard and should feel bad... but i doubt you will because you are too arrogant to admit your mistakes. Would you like to take a trip down memory lane?

Here is how you should proceed.

Open your minds up to any all opportunities to push out working boards or flood the market with a large number of chips at lower than market rate. Seek guidance and support so that you can build a team that can push those chips into working miners.

You can't seriously be deciding what is best here in this forum. You actually have to have all the parties in one room and be open to the idea of finding that solution where the chips are made into miners with compromise being the operative word. Failing an agreement you are left with diving up everything including the IP to pay back creditors.

If I were a creditor I would look at taking shares in HF as part payment if there was a solid team and investors in place moving forward. Out of this though you obviously need to get rid of the malignant parts that caused this debacle. We know who they are and that decision making power needs to be permanently removed their hands moving forward as soon as you have a viable entity if that is you want HF to continue.

Please read further before replying.



Gloat about what?  Being an idiot?

The Harassment Needs to Stop

This is Amy Abascal and I have stayed quiet, but I am here asking you to get this under control.  I joined HashFast and was only there for 6 1/2 weeks.  While I was there, I did absolutely everything in my power to get the company on track and to advocate for the customers.  There are many of you whom I spoke with and traded emails personally.  Look at my background.  I had a thriving career until March.  Last week, I got laid off and frankly, that was the best thing that could happen to me.

Since I left, my facebook and twitter accounts have been hammered with personal attacks and accusations. 

You are attacking the wrong person.  I regret the day I ever heard the word HashFast.  I own no coin.  I have no mining operation.  I am not running hardware that other people bought in my closet (or any hardware at all for that matter). 

I have avoided blocking people because I believe in honest, transparent communication - which you can see evidenced by how I directed communication the short time I was at HashFast.  I understand why this community is outraged and it has every right to be.  Hell, I'm outraged too.  However, the constant messages to my personal accounts are misdirected and just adding to this massive clusterf*ck.

If you are angry, I would recommend using rational ways to approach the problem.  That does not include personal harassment.

VMC is totally fucking incompetent! They have a track record of total failure and are under investigation for we securities fraud. Ken Slaughter is a fucking embarassment and everyone intelligent knows it.

So hey... can i still gloat? is that cool?

You and me and few other guys on this forum are not going to create a viable production line overnight.  It's going to have to be somebody with the capability to do it.  I hate VMC too, but if they are able...  I'd rather have liquidbits, if they are able, but the size of their illegitmate chip claim rules them out.  They'd have to come to Jesus and come to more reasonable terms with the other creditors.

But to be clear, the chip divvying scenario, in my head, is predicated upon the absolute and final death of Hashfast and stripping of the management of any proceeds.

If he is such an evil, we will willingly sabotage everything just for fun...

Simon could stay as CTO.  In a technical role.  Until the law catches up with him.

Edit 2: what exactly are they going to discuss on Wed if they have to wait for HF to file their chapter 11 the 3rd of the next month? And what will happen after that HF files for that? What's the timeline after that?