HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 264.

lemonte

hero member

Activity: 624

Merit: 502

Quote from: defcon23 on January 07, 2014, 03:36:57 PM

Quote from: ninjarobot on January 07, 2014, 03:29:57 PM

Quote from: -ck on January 07, 2014, 03:15:44 PM

I'm still here but I've got nothing to add since even I don't have hardware.

Join the club.

With no hardware nor communication from HF this thread is turning into an echo chamber filled with disgruntled customers (me included)

Would be great to get an update from the few folks with engineering samples (LukeJr & IceDrill) as to how the hardware performs.

As mentioned before, HF appears to be playing the silent game for now. (likely until the refund deadline has expired)

---------> http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/16qwSTqZq2Uv8WeNvCGhetVDkdU1a8QfC5

Just me, or does that thing look pretty unstable?

defcon23

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1002

Quote from: ninjarobot on January 07, 2014, 03:29:57 PM

Quote from: -ck on January 07, 2014, 03:15:44 PM

I'm still here but I've got nothing to add since even I don't have hardware.

Join the club.

With no hardware nor communication from HF this thread is turning into an echo chamber filled with disgruntled customers (me included)

Would be great to get an update from the few folks with engineering samples (LukeJr & IceDrill) as to how the hardware performs.

As mentioned before, HF appears to be playing the silent game for now. (likely until the refund deadline has expired)

---------> http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/16qwSTqZq2Uv8WeNvCGhetVDkdU1a8QfC5

ninjarobot

hero member

Activity: 761

Merit: 500

Mine Silent, Mine Deep

Quote from: -ck on January 07, 2014, 03:15:44 PM

I'm still here but I've got nothing to add since even I don't have hardware.

Join the club.

With no hardware nor communication from HF this thread is turning into an echo chamber filled with disgruntled customers (me included)

Would be great to get an update from the few folks with engineering samples (LukeJr & IceDrill) as to how the hardware performs.

As mentioned before, HF appears to be playing the silent game for now. (likely until the refund deadline has expired)

ASIC-K

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Hell?

can anyone track down cypherdoc IRL? just like joey the scammer.....lets get some details posted here

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

I'm still here but I've got nothing to add since even I don't have hardware.

dopamine

hero member

Activity: 486

Merit: 500

Where does cyberdoc play in this role for pumping the shit out of hashfast? Starting to see that if they couldn't find someone from the bitcoin community to promote Hashfast im sure most of us would never buy any of their babyjet with all their hype on beating knc, 100+ ASCI development and 100% BTC refund policy. Now Hashfast doesn't even come to the forum. Grin

. So cyberdoc why not disclose how much they paid you? Or are you part of this scam?

aneutronic

full member

Activity: 175

Merit: 100

Quote from: Melbustus on January 07, 2014, 02:35:13 PM

Quote from: fenwick on January 07, 2014, 01:43:49 PM

Quote from: fenwick on January 06, 2014, 07:40:24 PM

I have found a lawyer who is willing to take our case, and help us get our BTC back, if we can cooperate.)

The name is Ray E. Gallo.

Anybody up for a conference call with Ray, at 3 p.m. today, PT ?
I'll post details later.

Yes. If you could PM me details (or PM when you post details), that'd be ideal.

ditto.

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

The only reason i've yet to do it is because it's missing from here:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1584096/000158409613000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

I can't understand why. And anyway his name is not common at all.

perezoso

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: cedivad on January 07, 2014, 02:34:35 PM

I'm quite sure that you can do your researches and post them on the forum, no? It's not because of it being my wiki, it's because there is my name on the whois and i'm proceeding legally against HF (hiding it would have make no sense, it would just have make things worse).

You could at least place his middle name on the page, "Rufin". This makes identifying him much easier, if somebody else is doing research.

Melbustus

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1004

Quote from: fenwick on January 07, 2014, 01:43:49 PM

Quote from: fenwick on January 06, 2014, 07:40:24 PM

I have found a lawyer who is willing to take our case, and help us get our BTC back, if we can cooperate.)

The name is Ray E. Gallo.

Anybody up for a conference call with Ray, at 3 p.m. today, PT ?
I'll post details later.

Yes. If you could PM me details (or PM when you post details), that'd be ideal.

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

I'm quite sure that you can do your researches and post them on the forum, no? It's not because of it being my wiki, it's because there is my name on the whois and i'm proceeding legally against HF (hiding it would have make no sense, it would just have make things worse).

perezoso

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: cedivad on January 07, 2014, 02:09:08 PM

Apart from that, i would say that the pages about the management are already informative enough, referenced, and yet, in no way defamatory.

They are good Wiki pages.

http://hashfast.org/Edward_L._Rodriguez_de_Castro
http://hashfast.org/Simon_E._M._Barber
http://hashfast.org/John_Skrodenis

Well, it's your wiki, so I won't insist on developing Scrotum's bio. But there's nothing I was planning to post that would remotely qualify as being "defamatory" under US law. (I know a little about this, coming out of a campaigning NGO background...) Particularly since Skrodenis is a public figure. The standard is extremely high, it's not like some countries in Europe with lower thresholds. In order to libel Scrotum, you would have to knowingly place false and defamatory information on the page.

In other words, you'd have to know it was wrong, and you'd have to deliberately post it anyway with the intent of causing harm to him. I don't do that kind of thing, ever.

With this guy, there's absolutely no reason to even consider making anything up! The story is sordid enough already. In fact, you may be on shakier ground with all the talk about "lies" than I would place you in with the bio.

But I understand...

Coin_Master

full member

Activity: 148

Merit: 100

Quote from: mgio on January 07, 2014, 11:27:12 AM

It seems like many people are not aware of this but you don't have to make your refund request by Jan 15.

That date is arbitrary and not enforceable.

If HashFast has not shipped to you yet, you can get a refund AT ANY TIME>

They have not yet shipped, so no sale has taken place and you have not agreed to any contract.

They can't just say, "sorry, you ordered a product but didn't ask for your money back soon enough so we get to keep it regardless of whether we ever send you anything"

Don't believe their lies!!!

Agreed.
The HashFast refund policy was clarified to a number of people as far back as August 2013.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2924319 (at the end of this post, by one of the IceDrill Team)
then again in November
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3593783 (by iCEBREAKER)
finally on December 31st 2013 IceDrill Team Member 'will' stated: 'We're still in daily contact with HashFast regarding our order' and 'We can confirm that we will not take actions that would waive our statutory or contractual rights'
At no time did HashFast ever mention they had changed their position on the refund policy. It has always been understood that the 'payment form' determined the 'refund form'
This has been the case right up until midnight December 31st 2013. HashFast were asked by many people on many occasions, months before they failed to deliver. Miners were asking all the right questions and got told 'refunds are in BTC not USD' if you paid in BTC.

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

Apart from that, i would say that the pages about the management are already informative enough, referenced, and yet, in no way defamatory.

They are good Wiki pages.

http://hashfast.org/Edward_L._Rodriguez_de_Castro
http://hashfast.org/Simon_E._M._Barber
http://hashfast.org/John_Skrodenis

defcon23

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1002

i'm curious to know what CIARA think about their great partners now.... and what about their "future" customers too...

perezoso

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Somebody better with network stuff may want to chase these down:

http://whois.domaintools.com/johnrufin.com

He's registered 4 domains this year... wonder what. My skills in this department are so antiquated...

Oh, oops, looks like Cedivad doesn't like my style. Oh well.

cedivad

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1001

Quote from: perezoso on January 07, 2014, 01:27:11 PM

Can somebody let me in on the wiki? (perezoso)

I will be working on a much more detailed and well-sourced bio for Scrotum, which anyone with sourced information is of course welcome to contribute to.

As a public figure interviewed in the press, in online videos, and social media, and media-cited expert in bitcoins and bitcoin mining, John is spokesman for an important company selling millions of dollars of bitcoin mining devices and there is a legitimate public interest in a more comprehensive profile of his life and experiences.

Done.

But please note that my lawyer keep suggesting me to keep the wiki purely factual and referenced (non speculative, non defamatory, etc). I don't want anything like the surname you used associated with me.

Sorry for that, but i can't risk...

fenwick

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Quote from: fenwick on January 06, 2014, 07:40:24 PM

I have found a lawyer who is willing to take our case, and help us get our BTC back, if we can cooperate.)

The name is Ray E. Gallo.

Anybody up for a conference call with Ray, at 3 p.m. today, PT ?
I'll post details later.

EDIT

If you want the details, PM me your email address, where I can notify you.
(I can't notify you in PMs, because I can only send one PM in every 6 minutes, and only 5 PMs per hour.)

perezoso

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Can somebody let me in on the wiki? (perezoso)

I will be working on a much more detailed and well-sourced bio for Scrotum, which anyone with sourced information is of course welcome to contribute to.

As a public figure interviewed in the press, in online videos, and social media, and media-cited expert in bitcoins and bitcoin mining, John is spokesman for an important company selling millions of dollars of bitcoin mining devices and there is a legitimate public interest in a more comprehensive profile of his life and experiences.

Phinnaeus Gage

legendary

Activity: 1918

Merit: 1570

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

Quote from: pmorici on January 07, 2014, 11:35:10 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Probably best to not bother with CES if the T-Mobile CEO can't even slip by.

http://venturebeat.com/2014/01/06/t-mobile-ceo-crashes-atts-ces-party-gets-booted-by-security/

The whole point was to get kicked out...

Quote

Let’s be clear here, this is the very definition of a publicity stunt. Legere is smart enough to know that getting kicked out was a very likely outcome. And of course, the “controversy” surrounding it is nothing but good (and cheap) publicity for T-Mobile, and a knock against big bad AT&T.

Another option is to occupy the next Supperclub, where donning a costume is all the rage: http://www.sexlifecanada.ca/users/fleur-de-lis-sf/you-are-smelly-pirate-hookergo-back-your-home-whore-island

Quote

Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum a pirates life for me. What do you think of when you think about a pirate? When I was a kid, Pirates of the Caribbean was my favorite ride at Disneyland. I think we have all been to a restaurant or a street corner where you saw a guy with an eye patch or a parrot on his shoulder.

Quote

I had invited my new friends from Playpen.com, James and Kathee to participate in this sexy pirate themed evening.

Trendon Shavers: Wait, what! I was doing it all wrong.

Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 264. (Read 880461 times)