which means they didn't have a grasp on the entire financial end of developing Asics for customers? Lol ok thanks for confirming they didn't have a decent plan to deliver from the beginning lol
Don't put words in my mouth buddy. Are you too illiterate to be familiar with the phrase "The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry?"
The court rejected your tired old charge of incompetence, because HF is not responsible for adverse business conditions. Repeating the charge will not make it true. HF made best efforts but they just weren't enough to overcome their obstacles in time. If you expect business success to be guaranteed by a plan No Matter What, then you are an idiot of stunning naivete.
HF had a decent plan to deliver and they almost made it. Meeting their ambitious performance spec, while Cointerra whiffed, shows that.
Absent the ill-conceived bankruptcy filings, HF had every chance of being recapitalized and able to eventually meet its refund and other obligations.
MPP was delayed because HF could only test chips and build boards so fast due to logistical/financial constraints, and shipping Batch 2,3,4 was the priority.
Meanwhile, raw chips became a viable option as Peppermining and others set up parallel board assembly operations.
You do realize that instead of sending customers raw chips so they can each send them back to a chip integrator, HF could have just contracted Peppermining and/or Bitcrane to build their hardware right? But then again that would have made too much sense financially and logistically.
No Jimmothy that is not true at all. Do you even know what a "financial constraint" is? That means HF couldn't afford to put MPP chips on boards, even if Peppermining/Bitcrane had enough capacity and components to produce them. Babbling nonsense about NASA rockets? Get a grip, man!