Pages:
Author

Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 44. (Read 880461 times)

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
...and the shit talking continues...

Does anyone know if there is any serious progress happening?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
I don't think Phinn's and your debunked conspiracy theories about secret mines and secret wallets panned out any more than cedivad's months of bragging about how his lawyer was going to easily put people in jail.   Cheesy
You have yet to see me start trying, and I wouldn't brag about it if I were in you, since that you are high on my list.

As always, the rest of your nonsense when not deliberately misleading post doesn't deserve an answer.

I'm "high on [your] list?"  With what exactly are you threatening me?   Roll Eyes

You were the one "bragging" for months about your unstoppable lawyer's righteous wrath.  But when HashFast got its day in court, you folded like a cheap lawn chair!   Cheesy

He is sort of not my lawyer anymore

Misguided and counterproductive as their actions were, at least MM & Professor Pete had the guts to follow through with their vain attempts to bleed a turnip, unlike your empty bluster and hollow accusations.

Where is the proof of HF's "private private datacenter?"  Why isn't your almighty lawyer telling the judge about your silly conspiracy theories?

Put up or shut up!   Kiss
legendary
Activity: 1630
Merit: 1000
so... who wants to do a sum of of where we are with hashfast and the eta on getting our 10cents backs.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
I don't think Phinn's and your debunked conspiracy theories about secret mines and secret wallets panned out any more than cedivad's months of bragging about how his lawyer was going to easily put people in jail.   Cheesy
You have yet to see me start trying, and I wouldn't brag about it if I were in you, since that you are high on my list.

As always, the rest of your nonsense when not deliberately misleading post doesn't deserve an answer.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1020
Be A Digital Miner
anyone know if there will be criminal charges laid? and what happen to the bitcoins they hold? and what will the IP be worth to pay off their creditors?
Which IP? How much do you think it to be worth? They claim to have like 5 BTC.
What about that 3000 btc address that was outed?
https://blockchain.info/address/1KFrqkEGy6Yq7X4SYCbYoj8HEwfbWVUDJ9
That's probably a Bitpay address; if it belonged to HF it would be listed on the inventory.
I don't think Phinn's and your debunked conspiracy theories about secret mines and secret wallets panned out any more than cedivad's months of bragging about how his lawyer was going to easily put people in jail.   Cheesy
Instead of blathering paranoid defamatory nonsense, let's now discuss the latest court filings:
HF has filed suit against Uniquify to get their (IE our) wafers back, while Uniquify wants to hold them hostage.  The law seems to be on HF's side, so we will probably get the wafers back and may even see some damages awarded for the loss in value/extortion.
Uniquify would be in the wrong here.   I am sure they will release them.   They seem to be trying to bypass the creditor process and get money that they are not entitled to.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
anyone know if there will be criminal charges laid? and what happen to the bitcoins they hold? and what will the IP be worth to pay off their creditors?
Which IP? How much do you think it to be worth? They claim to have like 5 BTC.

What about that 3000 btc address that was outed?

https://blockchain.info/address/1KFrqkEGy6Yq7X4SYCbYoj8HEwfbWVUDJ9

That's probably a Bitpay address; if it belonged to HF it would be listed on the inventory.

I don't think Phinn's and your debunked conspiracy theories about secret mines and secret wallets panned out any more than cedivad's months of bragging about how his lawyer was going to easily put people in jail.   Cheesy

Instead of blathering paranoid defamatory nonsense, let's now discuss the latest court filings:

HF has filed suit against Uniquify to get their (IE our) wafers back, while Uniquify wants to hold them hostage.  The law seems to be on HF's side, so we will probably get the wafers back and may even see some damages awarded for the loss in value/extortion.
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
anyone know if there will be criminal charges laid? and what happen to the bitcoins they hold? and what will the IP be worth to pay off their creditors?
Which IP? How much do you think it to be worth? They claim to have like 5 BTC.

What about that 3000 btc address that was outed?

https://blockchain.info/address/1KFrqkEGy6Yq7X4SYCbYoj8HEwfbWVUDJ9

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
anyone know if there will be criminal charges laid? and what happen to the bitcoins they hold? and what will the IP be worth to pay off their creditors?
Which IP? How much do you think it to be worth? They claim to have like 5 BTC.
hero member
Activity: 486
Merit: 500
anyone know if there will be criminal charges laid? and what happen to the bitcoins they hold? and what will the IP be worth to pay off their creditors?
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Proof of claims should only be filed against Hashfast Technologies LLC (case 14-30725) and not the other HashFast company?
Yes, but the deadline passed. The two cases were "substantively consolidated". If you don't disagree with them with your credit there wasn't any need to file anything.

ok, thanks!

are the two cases really consolidated? because if I fill in the case 14-30866 (HashFast LLC) I'm not listed as a creditor and when I fill in the case 14-30725 (HashFast Technologies LLC) I'm listed as a creditor:

https://ecf.canb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/autoFilingClaims.pl

EDIT: got also this "substantively consolidated" note via US mail.
sr. member
Activity: 255
Merit: 250
Sometimes something is funny when it's also true.

Josh's remark is neither.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


Someone is copying from HF's book.
sr. member
Activity: 255
Merit: 250
Proof of claims should only be filed against Hashfast Technologies LLC (case 14-30725) and not the other HashFast company?
Yes, but the deadline passed. The two cases were "substantively consolidated". If you don't disagree with them with your credit there wasn't any need to file anything.

OK tnx. Still funny that I got the "substantively consolidated" notice (by mail) after the deadline for filing PoC had passed.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Proof of claims should only be filed against Hashfast Technologies LLC (case 14-30725) and not the other HashFast company?
Yes, but the deadline passed. The two cases were "substantively consolidated". If you don't disagree with them with your credit there wasn't any need to file anything.
sr. member
Activity: 255
Merit: 250
If I understand correctly:

Proof of claims should only be filed against Hashfast Technologies LLC (case 14-30725) and not the other HashFast company?
full member
Activity: 200
Merit: 100
17 october is the next update? when we got our money back fuk, i already ask my money january back because i knew this would happend. now is all fuckup
+1
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
17 october is the next update? when we got our money back fuk, i already ask my money january back because i knew this would happend. now is all fuckup
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Any news on hashfast, or any timeframes to when they can start providing refunds? i thought they started selling alot of items?

No refunds and non will be.
They sell their new products but we'll get jack shit.

They will, probably, soon start posting new photos of themselves grinning while holding their alleged new products.
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
Probably something to do with all the pay increases when they claimed to be short on cash flow!
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
How did they almost recover from their mistakes? They have had a working ASIC since January. Their one mistake was that their massive stacks of money magically disappeared.

Honestly what happened to the money?

Why isn't that argument in court? They promised delivery by Oct/Nov/Dec, but they failed and had working units in January? How is not that a fail/scam?
Pages:
Jump to: