Pages:
Author

Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s - page 60. (Read 880728 times)

vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Again, I ask how the fuck is it possible for Gregory Bachrach to claim that he is/was the CEO of LiquibBits since its foundation, but there's not a single piece of shit paper depicting such with the exception of his words directed toward a Judge?

Until I get an answer, I will beat this fuckin' dead horse to death.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Bruno, you really need to take a step away from the computer.

Just because someone is CEO of a company does not mean that they started the company or have a controlling interest in the company.

Good point! In that vain, I'm now CEO of Bitcoin. Not a single shred of proof needed for Gregory Bachrach to inform a judge that he's the CEO of LiquidBits, so no need for a shred of proof that I, Bruno Kucinskas, is the CEO of Bitcoin. All one has to do is declare such first and you're it.

~Bruno Kucinskas (Bitcoin CEO)
vip
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
Again, I ask how the fuck is it possible for Gregory Bachrach to claim that he is/was the CEO of LiquibBits since its foundation, but there's not a single piece of shit paper depicting such with the exception of his words directed toward a Judge?

Until I get an answer, I will beat this fuckin' dead horse to death.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Bruno, you really need to take a step away from the computer.

Just because someone is CEO of a company does not mean that they started the company or have a controlling interest in the company.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145


From the desk of Am I the only one who has noticed this?,

I can easily connect Millie Tadewaldt to Sandbox, Sandlot and Sandgate... and to LiquidBits, albeit it'll be the one with them birds, of which I can connect to Sandlot.



I suggest you better stock up with as much as possible if you desire to continue to play in this Bitcoin space. You're goin' need every drop.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145


Here's the funny part: The person who did the scamming AND the auditor/liquidator (above) are members of this forum, and to this day nary a cent's been returned. But don't worry, what are the chance that either one of them are even loosely connected to LiquidBits?  Roll Eyes


None.  Period.  You seem very intent on continuing this attack on Liquidbits.  Really what gives?  have you read the transcripts?  Read how Liquidbits files the first Temporary Restraining Order and their legal procedure against Hashfast retaining a top lawfirm (Bingham).  Your allusions are baseless and logic absurd.  Worse.  They ARE USELESS.  MOVE ON.  Liquidbits is now only a creditor --- and yes contrarily to what you ALSO tried to insinuate, they did pay in full the millions sent to hashfast and claimed.  SO why don't we stop with them and focus on the real issues: What is now going on?  What is the Creditor's committee doing?  They MUST be in touch with the CRO.  So why no news now?  The CRO has been on the job for 2 weeks now?  What's the proposed course of action?

Including the part where Gregory Bachrach has been LiquidBits' CEO from the get-go/2011?

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2011%5C0930%5C12425393.Tif&documentNumber=P11000084688



http://www.scribd.com/doc/225704506/Bachrach-Declaration-Liquidbits-v-HashFast



Again, I ask how the fuck is it possible for Gregory Bachrach to claim that he is/was the CEO of LiquibBits since its foundation, but there's not a single piece of shit paper depicting such with the exception of his words directed toward a Judge?

Until I get an answer, I will beat this fuckin' dead horse to death.

~Bruno Kucinskas
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0


Here's the funny part: The person who did the scamming AND the auditor/liquidator (above) are members of this forum, and to this day nary a cent's been returned. But don't worry, what are the chance that either one of them are even loosely connected to LiquidBits?  Roll Eyes


None.  Period.  You seem very intent on continuing this attack on Liquidbits.  Really what gives?  have you read the transcripts?  Read how Liquidbits files the first Temporary Restraining Order and their legal procedure against Hashfast retaining a top lawfirm (Bingham).  Your allusions are baseless and logic absurd.  Worse.  They ARE USELESS.  MOVE ON.  Liquidbits is now only a creditor --- and yes contrarily to what you ALSO tried to insinuate, they did pay in full the millions sent to hashfast and claimed.  SO why don't we stop with them and focus on the real issues: What is now going on?  What is the Creditor's committee doing?  They MUST be in touch with the CRO.  So why no news now?  The CRO has been on the job for 2 weeks now?  What's the proposed course of action?
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
List of 20 largest creditors:

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20140827184109/http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

Most these names are related to HashFast of which they want to pay themselves first. Hell, I'm beginning to believe that LiquidBits didn't give a dime to HashFast, and only made a bogus claim on paper. Greg Bachrach is not listed as LiquidBits since its founding or even now, yet there he is front and center with his hand out.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/237907113/Sandgate-Technologies-PA-Business-status



Ironically, Adam Ettinger, HashFast's former lawyer, is now on Team Sandlot.

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.170.pdf

Quote
Ms. Hushen testified that Mr. Spackman is a principal of Sandgate Technologies, an Australian company. I
understand its other principals are Adrian Port and John Wells. Chad Spackman, the Port Family Trust and the
Wells Family Trust (non-cash contributors) each received 666,667 shares of Class A stock in the Parent upon its
formation. [See Case No. 14-30866, List of Equity Security Holders, Pacer Docket #5.]


LiquidBits did intact put $6M into HF.  Who cares.  All this posting about who is legally owned by who just shows how ignorant everyone is as it all doesn't matter.  What the HECK is going on now that the all mighty CRO on behalf of the creditors committee is in place?  Nobody at HF answers the phone, no news updates, no nothing.  Typical stall and pay legal bills to screw the creditors further?!  We are doomed.


+1 I just want to know when we are going to get some money back and how much??? What % of the original purchase price, because that is what it will boil down to, meanwhile I continue to receive mail about this lawyer representing the committee and that lawyer filing a motion for this that and the other!!! It's all so damn confusing and appears to me that everyone who can earn a fee off the back of us unfortunate creditors is doing so.... The longer this stalls the more $$$ they make. It's just one scam after another even the legal system can't be trusted to act in an appropriate manner to protect our best interests, we are all doomed!! And lucky to receive a penny! I just want things to start moving faster and I deserve answers!

It could be worse! There's this group of people that have yet to receive a dime from their scam investment: http://www.offshorealert.com/forums.aspx?g=posts&t=37064

Quote
The REAL question is just WHOSE capital is the auditor using?

An auditor who "somehow" missed a lot of assets, or did he?

Having the auditor as the liquidator was another real smart business move, don't you think?

Here's the funny part: The person who did the scamming AND the auditor/liquidator (above) are members of this forum, and to this day nary a cent's been returned. But don't worry, what are the chance that either one of them are even loosely connected to LiquidBits?  Roll Eyes

When you can't take it any longer getting fucked deeper up the ass, kindly ask those doing the fucking to please stop. If you're lucky, they may comply, otherwise take it like a man and say, "Thank you! May we order another one?"

http://rolandbleyerfraud.com/Forums.aspx?g=posts&t=36737

Quote
[That's the jaw-dropping, amazing, downright stupefying thing about it.]

Nah, the jaw-dropping, amazing, downright stupefying thing is that some of the very SAME investors who have been burned so bad , and treated with a human rights violation type of contempt by these "insiders" are going to do it again.

I fly a starship across the Universe divide
And when I reach the other side
I'll find a place to rest my spirit if I can
Perhaps I may become a highwayman again
Or I may simply be a single drop of rain
But I will remain
And I'll be back again, and again and again and again and again..
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
List of 20 largest creditors:

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20140827184109/http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

Most these names are related to HashFast of which they want to pay themselves first. Hell, I'm beginning to believe that LiquidBits didn't give a dime to HashFast, and only made a bogus claim on paper. Greg Bachrach is not listed as LiquidBits since its founding or even now, yet there he is front and center with his hand out.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/237907113/Sandgate-Technologies-PA-Business-status

http://s9.postimg.org/ujsl2slin/Sandgate.jpg

Ironically, Adam Ettinger, HashFast's former lawyer, is now on Team Sandlot.

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.170.pdf

Quote
Ms. Hushen testified that Mr. Spackman is a principal of Sandgate Technologies, an Australian company. I
understand its other principals are Adrian Port and John Wells. Chad Spackman, the Port Family Trust and the
Wells Family Trust (non-cash contributors) each received 666,667 shares of Class A stock in the Parent upon its
formation. [See Case No. 14-30866, List of Equity Security Holders, Pacer Docket #5.]


LiquidBits did intact put $6M into HF.  Who cares.  All this posting about who is legally owned by who just shows how ignorant everyone is as it all doesn't matter.  What the HECK is going on now that the all mighty CRO on behalf of the creditors committee is in place?  Nobody at HF answers the phone, no news updates, no nothing.  Typical stall and pay legal bills to screw the creditors further?!  We are doomed.


+1 I just want to know when we are going to get some money back and how much??? What % of the original purchase price, because that is what it will boil down to, meanwhile I continue to receive mail about this lawyer representing the committee and that lawyer filing a motion for this that and the other!!! It's all so damn confusing and appears to me that everyone who can earn a fee off the back of us unfortunate creditors is doing so.... The longer this stalls the more $$$ they make. It's just one scam after another even the legal system can't be trusted to act in an appropriate manner to protect our best interests, we are all doomed!! And lucky to receive a penny! I just want things to start moving faster and I deserve answers!

+1 as well.  It seems that an incomprehensible amount of energy spent on trying to demonize Liquibits at all costs on this forum.  One really has to wonder why.  Pushing it to the point of remarkably idiotic "research" and reasoning fallacies.  ENOUGH with this already.  Liquidbits proposition is GONE for better or for worse.  Gone. Over.  Part of history.  Past.  Can we move on? WHAT IS GOING NOW, TODAY.  That's all that matters.  What are our options?  Why are we being kept in the dark?  Can't the committee who used to be so vocal in accusing everyone and trashing every option we might have had, provide some information  and give some news?  What is the CRO doing?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
List of 20 largest creditors:

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20140827184109/http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

Most these names are related to HashFast of which they want to pay themselves first. Hell, I'm beginning to believe that LiquidBits didn't give a dime to HashFast, and only made a bogus claim on paper. Greg Bachrach is not listed as LiquidBits since its founding or even now, yet there he is front and center with his hand out.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/237907113/Sandgate-Technologies-PA-Business-status



Ironically, Adam Ettinger, HashFast's former lawyer, is now on Team Sandlot.

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.170.pdf

Quote
Ms. Hushen testified that Mr. Spackman is a principal of Sandgate Technologies, an Australian company. I
understand its other principals are Adrian Port and John Wells. Chad Spackman, the Port Family Trust and the
Wells Family Trust (non-cash contributors) each received 666,667 shares of Class A stock in the Parent upon its
formation. [See Case No. 14-30866, List of Equity Security Holders, Pacer Docket #5.]


LiquidBits did intact put $6M into HF.  Who cares.  All this posting about who is legally owned by who just shows how ignorant everyone is as it all doesn't matter.  What the HECK is going on now that the all mighty CRO on behalf of the creditors committee is in place?  Nobody at HF answers the phone, no news updates, no nothing.  Typical stall and pay legal bills to screw the creditors further?!  We are doomed.


+1 I just want to know when we are going to get some money back and how much??? What % of the original purchase price, because that is what it will boil down to, meanwhile I continue to receive mail about this lawyer representing the committee and that lawyer filing a motion for this that and the other!!! It's all so damn confusing and appears to me that everyone who can earn a fee off the back of us unfortunate creditors is doing so.... The longer this stalls the more $$$ they make. It's just one scam after another even the legal system can't be trusted to act in an appropriate manner to protect our best interests, we are all doomed!! And lucky to receive a penny! I just want things to start moving faster and I deserve answers!
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
List of 20 largest creditors:

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20140827184109/http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

Most these names are related to HashFast of which they want to pay themselves first. Hell, I'm beginning to believe that LiquidBits didn't give a dime to HashFast, and only made a bogus claim on paper. Greg Bachrach is not listed as LiquidBits since its founding or even now, yet there he is front and center with his hand out.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/237907113/Sandgate-Technologies-PA-Business-status

http://s9.postimg.org/ujsl2slin/Sandgate.jpg

Ironically, Adam Ettinger, HashFast's former lawyer, is now on Team Sandlot.

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.170.pdf

Quote
Ms. Hushen testified that Mr. Spackman is a principal of Sandgate Technologies, an Australian company. I
understand its other principals are Adrian Port and John Wells. Chad Spackman, the Port Family Trust and the
Wells Family Trust (non-cash contributors) each received 666,667 shares of Class A stock in the Parent upon its
formation. [See Case No. 14-30866, List of Equity Security Holders, Pacer Docket #5.]


LiquidBits did intact put $6M into HF.  Who cares.  All this posting about who is legally owned by who just shows how ignorant everyone is as it all doesn't matter.  What the HECK is going on now that the all mighty CRO on behalf of the creditors committee is in place?  Nobody at HF answers the phone, no news updates, no nothing.  Typical stall and pay legal bills to screw the creditors further?!  We are doomed.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
List of 20 largest creditors:

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20140827184109/http://hashfast.org/14-30725.148.pdf

Most these names are related to HashFast of which they want to pay themselves first. Hell, I'm beginning to believe that LiquidBits didn't give a dime to HashFast, and only made a bogus claim on paper. Greg Bachrach is not listed as LiquidBits since its founding or even now, yet there he is front and center with his hand out.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/237907113/Sandgate-Technologies-PA-Business-status



Ironically, Adam Ettinger, HashFast's former lawyer, is now on Team Sandlot.

http://hashfast.org/14-30725.170.pdf

Quote
Ms. Hushen testified that Mr. Spackman is a principal of Sandgate Technologies, an Australian company. I
understand its other principals are Adrian Port and John Wells. Chad Spackman, the Port Family Trust and the
Wells Family Trust (non-cash contributors) each received 666,667 shares of Class A stock in the Parent upon its
formation. [See Case No. 14-30866, List of Equity Security Holders, Pacer Docket #5.]
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Again with Coinware/Liquidbits!  Why?  What's the point? Am I responsible for bringing the topic back?  All I said initially what that I feared we might come to regret their proposition.  Perhaps I should have said "Let's do everything in our limited power to not come to regret their plan".  Let's move on already! They have not been in the loop for some time now, other than being a creditor -- and by very far the largest of all, from what I have read.  They made a proposition to the committee, they argued for it in court and answered questions on this forum (no one else so far did the same). The committee rejected it, the judge rejected their deadline, they went their way.  Is there more, besides the very easily verifiable fact that neither Coinware nor Liquidbits are registered in the British Ocean Territory but in the United States of America?  If anything, the above posts seem to indicate that Coinware / LQB would have had the financial wherewithal to actually pull off the creditor's mega-mine -- but then, again, how is it relevant today?  Who cares?  That ship sailed a while back.  End of story.

The committee said they had other offers on the table, the only thing we saw was the CRO being nominated.  

I think that the only thing that really matters today is: Are there indeed other propositions on the table and if so what might they be?  I have not been able to find out (besides the eventual, possible, nebulous projects such as the Franchise mine for which I never could find any details besides rumors).  The CRO is quiet, perhaps he is working out a deal, or simply preparing to liquidate what's left of the assets at auction.  Anyone knows?  That would be the "gist" of the situation.  The committee should know.  I am sure they are in contact with the CRO.  It is sensible.  Can't they give us any information?  It's hard to imagine that "nothing" is going on.

The point being is that all these major Bitcoin Camp are interwoven to one degree or another nefariously.

Another "time is everything" quote: http://www.chipestimate.tv/aboutus.php

Quote
"Time to market is critical in the fast emerging bitcoin mining market," remarkjavascript:void(0);s Josh Lee, founder and CEO of Uniquify, who notes that the design highlights the quality of Uniquify’s work. "First silicon worked as expected, proving Uniquify and HashFast can deliver leading-edge silicon in a short timeframe, and a testament to Uniquify’s expertise and ability to quickly turn a design without sacrificing quality."

I'm still curious if Josh (Jung) Lee is related to Charles Lee.

FYI: http://www.chipestimate.com/dac2008/presentations/cebatech.pdf

Quote
Chad Spackman Title or job function CTO, Founder


http://www.scribd.com/doc/228713882/US-Bankruptcy-Court-Hashfast-llc-List-of-Equity-Security-Holders





Compare the list above with what's on this list and see how Chad Spackman truly made out: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:HGKRj7gx9BcJ:www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/0000/0504/05049895.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Feel free to explore other names on the list, starting with James de Castro, while I do the same.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:HGKRj7gx9BcJ:www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/0000/0504/05049895.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

For someone with such a great past there should be more than enough evidence backing up his profile, like papers he wrote, talks he gave at conferences and such..

A remarkable point is at least, for all combos of his name and a company from his linkedin-profile, the first hit is always his linkedin-profile - doesn't increase confidence.

Btw: check this profile, too
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=9921043&privcapId=1994285&previousCapId=1994285&previousTitle=iVivity,%20Inc.
 "This person is connected to 0 Board Members in 0 different organizations across 0 different industries."
 
maybe another person, since this finding is not mentioned on his linkedin-profile ?!
http://www.oit.gatech.edu/content/about-oit

minor inconsistency found:
http://www.solidoaktech.com/executive.html says Jim O'Connor is still executive
while linked in profile shows this as his past


quick google shots lead me the following results:
----------------------------------------------------------------
 General Electric:
 only found Matthew J. O’Connor - same person ? If so why 'Matthew J' instead of Jim ??
 http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/carlyle-hires-g-e-executive-for-power-investment-team/?ref=generalelectriccompany&_r=0

 Star Technologies:
 nothing found

 Broadband Technologies:
 nothing found

 Nortel (Networks?!):
 nothing found

 Zagros Networks:
 nothing found

 SMSC:
 nothing found

 Altior Inc.:  http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Jim-O%27Connor/1636630158 (easy to fake)
                        http://www.insideview.com/directory/altior-inc => shows 'http://www.cebatech.com/' as website for Altior Inc.
                                                                                                               and this domain is registered, only - no content at all => very fishy

----------------------------------------------------------------

 techjim.com found here http://occcsa.com/rfc/rfc2701.htm (no, he did not work on the rfc, just konverted the doc to html)
 doesn't look like a page of any kind of professional
  http://techjim.com
  http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JSocfDj7OsIJ:techjim.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk

 occcsa.com belongs to JAMES O'Connor with mail address [email protected]

JAMES O'Connor looks quite similar to JIM O'Connor, no?
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DPiYBBSSC8IJ:https://profile.usgs.gov/oconnor/+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk

http://web.archive.org/web/20060215132317/http://www.cebatech.com/executive.html

Dr David likes his privacy, so his name has been removed from the website.
I'm going to just preserve this here for future reference, so people won't need to dig through some archives or caches.

Cointerra/Team
 
Cointerra boasts a highly experienced engineering team of semiconductor architects and designers who have previously designed some of the world’s highest performance CPUs, GPUs and chipsets for Nvidia, Intel, Samsung, Qualcomm and Nortel. Having worked on several generations of low-power mobile devices, our team brings tremendous experience in power efficient circuitry, design methodology and implementation to the exciting new frontier of Bitcoin mining.

Executive team

The architecture, design and development effort is lead by : Ravi Iyengar, Dr. David Tannenbaum, and Jim O’Connor. The Advisory Board is headed by Dr. Naveed Sherwani.
 
Ravi Iyengar
FOUNDER & CEO

http://www.linkedin.com/in/ravidiyengar

Before founding Cointerra, Ravi was a Lead CPU Architect at Samsung Corporation. Ravi brings with him 15 years of industry experience in Architecture, Design and Verification in CPU, GPU, Desktop/Server Chipsets and ASIC Cores, and years of leadership experience in top Semi-conductor companies like Samsung, Qualcomm, NVIDIA, and Intel. Ravi has a Master’s Degree in Computer Engineering from Wright State University and a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from National Institute of Technology, India.
 
Dr. David Tannenbaum
Chief Architect

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/david-tannenbaum/12/4b6/647

David works as a Consultant Architect & Designer at Cointerra. He is a Principal Engineer at NVIDIA Corporation and has over 25 years of experience in the industry. He brings with him vast experience in the design of arithmetic intensive logic including single, double precision floating-point, custom floating-point, IEEE formats, transcendental support, fused multiply-add, integer operations, conversions, logical operations, custom instructions, exponentiation, logarithms. Inventor on 20+ patents. David has a Ph.D in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Jim O’Connor
VP of Engineering

http://www.linkedin.com/in/jgoconnor

Over 35 years of experience in design and management. Jim has held management positions at Altior Inc(now Exar), SMSC(now Microchip), iVivity, Zagros Networks and Orologic(now Vitesse Semiconductor), Nortel Semiconductor and BroadBand Technologies.  

Jim has also held lead design positions at BroadBand Technologies, Star Technologies, General Electric, and Teledyne. His experience includes SOC design and verification, Assertion-Based Verification, physical design, systems design, software and firmware in graphics, datacom, telecom and security.

Jim is a graduate of General Electric’s Edison Engineering program and holds B.S. and M. Eng. Degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Louisville’s Speed Scientific School.

 
Dr. Naveed Sherwani
Advisor

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/naveed-sherwani/0/89/2a7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-Silicon

Co-Founder, President & CEO of Open Silicon. Prior to co-founding Open-Silicon, Dr. Sherwani was the founder and General Manager of Intel Microelectronics Services where he led efforts to promote the use of disciplined ASIC methodologies to improve design efficiency and time-to-market. He currently chairs the GSA (Global Semiconductor Association) Technical Steering Committee.

Dr. Sherwani co-architected the Intel microprocessor design methodology and environment that has been used in several leading microprocessors. Prior to joining Intel, he worked as a consultant for various telecommunications and computer companies, mainly focusing on ASIC design flow and cell library design to improve time-to-market.

Dr. Sherwani is the author of textbook on Physical Design, which is widely used as the main textbook at major universities around the world. In addition, he has authored or co-authored three books and over 100 articles on various aspects of Physical Design Automation and ASICs.

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1083
Guys...
Today, I received another 2 letters from US Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California.

First letter provides an advise about filing a claim. Which I already did online and I also send a letter directly to Office of The Clerk US Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California. Office of The Clerk replied that they received my form online and that I am already on the list of creditors.

Second letter provides a list of all creditors. I have not found my name on the list again.

I realy don't understand it. What should I think about it now. Does anyone know why I am still not on the list despite the confirmation from the clerk?

For me it's the opposite. I found my name on the list but they still sent me that letter about registering my claim. I think it's safe to say that if they have your name on the creditors list then you don't need to file your claim again. If I were you I'd file the claim again and also send a letter asking them to confirm that I'm on the list and or to send you an updated creditors list (with your name on it).

newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Again with Coinware/Liquidbits!  Why?  What's the point? Am I responsible for bringing the topic back?  All I said initially what that I feared we might come to regret their proposition.  Perhaps I should have said "Let's do everything in our limited power to not come to regret their plan".  Let's move on already! They have not been in the loop for some time now, other than being a creditor -- and by very far the largest of all, from what I have read.  They made a proposition to the committee, they argued for it in court and answered questions on this forum (no one else so far did the same). The committee rejected it, the judge rejected their deadline, they went their way.  Is there more, besides the very easily verifiable fact that neither Coinware nor Liquidbits are registered in the British Ocean Territory but in the United States of America?  If anything, the above posts seem to indicate that Coinware / LQB would have had the financial wherewithal to actually pull off the creditor's mega-mine -- but then, again, how is it relevant today?  Who cares?  That ship sailed a while back.  End of story.

The committee said they had other offers on the table, the only thing we saw was the CRO being nominated.  

I think that the only thing that really matters today is: Are there indeed other propositions on the table and if so what might they be?  I have not been able to find out (besides the eventual, possible, nebulous projects such as the Franchise mine for which I never could find any details besides rumors).  The CRO is quiet, perhaps he is working out a deal, or simply preparing to liquidate what's left of the assets at auction.  Anyone knows?  That would be the "gist" of the situation.  The committee should know.  I am sure they are in contact with the CRO.  It is sensible.  Can't they give us any information?  It's hard to imagine that "nothing" is going on.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
How is it that you're always at the ready to reply to my posts when they refer to you after being absent for a spell?

Just because I don't throw up with my keyboard all over the forum does not mean I am not keeping tabs on what is going on.

I am acutely aware of what is / is not happening with HashFast.


Can I offer you an airsickness bag?
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
https://twitter.com/gbachrach/status/71682920292696065

Because I'm an awesome guy, I'm paying acorn $10 USD and Korbman $5 USD via bitcoins. Please provide me an address via PM so that I can pay you. Apologies for not PM'ing you both for the time being, for I'm busy.

~TMIBITW

Thanks, received my reward just now! Cheers.

And I received mine as well, though 3 hours ago at this point Smiley
Thanks again!


So now that there's proof of a transaction, time to speculate on what drives people to continually purchase from BFL? I'm not sure about others, but if I had to spend $1,000,000 on mining hardware, I'm willing to reason I'd be able to strike a deal with 2 or 3 other developers other than BFL...

Interesting! Three hours prior to the $1M USD transaction, this...

Quote
Re: Gigamining: Request for claims
October 21, 2013, 02:55:47 PM
 #5
Claims are now closed.

The law officer is the same used by the HashTrade two main principles going back several years: https://virtualprocessingsolutions.com/claims

Quote
qpage at mylawyr dot com

or

Law Offices of Carlos M. Fleites
ATTN: Quentin A. Page
407 Lincoln Road, Suite 12-E
Miami Beach, FL 33139
USA

Granted, I may have a couple facts not quite correct in the above, but I sure the fuck do have the gist of the situation nailed.

~Bruno Kucinskas
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
How is it that you're always at the ready to reply to my posts when they refer to you after being absent for a spell?

Just because I don't throw up with my keyboard all over the forum does not mean I am not keeping tabs on what is going on.

I am acutely aware of what is / is not happening with HashFast.

Well if you are acutely aware, you must be the only one, as even the management there and the CRO are not acutely aware.  So why don't you enlighten us all and tell us what exactly is going on?

I'm guessing it has something to do with LiquidBits, its CEO, Greg Bachrach, whose name is not mentioned on any official documents that I've found to date, and a six million dollar purchase that may or may not existed.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
How is it that you're always at the ready to reply to my posts when they refer to you after being absent for a spell?

Just because I don't throw up with my keyboard all over the forum does not mean I am not keeping tabs on what is going on.

I am acutely aware of what is / is not happening with HashFast.

Well if you are acutely aware, you must be the only one, as even the management there and the CRO are not acutely aware.  So why don't you enlighten us all and tell us what exactly is going on?
vip
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
How is it that you're always at the ready to reply to my posts when they refer to you after being absent for a spell?

Just because I don't throw up with my keyboard all over the forum does not mean I am not keeping tabs on what is going on.

I am acutely aware of what is / is not happening with HashFast.
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
I'll leave it up to you to figure out who penned the above quote.

No need. I can do it for you.

Is this the same James (gigavps) from mega-giga-teramining that posted last week he was working on tripling his hashrate ?

I will triple my hash rate by buying IN-HAND equipment from manufacturers who do not keep giant order queues waiting for months.

Well, I was almost gone. This is so true. James of HashTrade/CoinWare ordered thousands of miners late last year. I think it was even in the Kansas City paper I once read in the break room when the order was placed. And it is Gibson since somebody already guess it. Wasn't sure how much I can say on this forum board.

While I was affiliated with Coinware/HashTrade in the middle of last year, I am now only an investor in LiquidBits and have yet to receive any hash rate from my investment.

http://www.hashtrade.com/about.html Greg Bachrach is related to James Gibson by marriage I believe but don't know how.

I am not related to Greg Bachrach by marriage. nibbknot, if you are going to post stuff you "think" is factual, maybe you should verify your information first.



How is it that you're always at the ready to reply to my posts when they refer to you after being absent for a spell?
Pages:
Jump to: