Pages:
Author

Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: up to 800GH/s [Non Self Moderated] - page 3. (Read 6903 times)

hero member
Activity: 991
Merit: 500
HashFast's new world record holding 750+ GH/s ASIC.

This isn't the ASIC Olympics.

To HashFast that's all it is... (wow and my single post about my deleted mosts was deleted... thanks Chris!  Cool )

(this is a repost before CL deletes this one too, I'm at 100% deletes now)
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
Don't let the nam-shub in your operating system.
HashFast's new world record holding 750+ GH/s ASIC.

This isn't the ASIC Olympics.

To HashFast that's all it is... (wow and my single post about my deleted mosts was deleted... thanks Chris!  Cool )

(this is a repost before CL deletes this one too, I'm at 100% deletes now)
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
If HashFast's spec-smashing 2TH is pathetic, then what are CT's 20% power and performance misses? 

Yes you nailed it, HashFast's track record of delivering equipment on time to customers is pathetic, there is no better word for it
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
Why come in here and pollute a thread created for the benefit of those who disagree with your opinion?  Ego boosting or what?

To make sure other people don't make the same mistake I've made in the past: if you spend any money on Hashfast equipment, you are sure to get it too late (if it even ships), it will not perform as promised and their customer support is horrible

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ze69c/core_developer_gmaxwell_speaks_out_against/
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
Keep deleting, I'll keep reposting

HashFast has a working assembly line at CIARA, an ISO9000 certified leader in assembling/testing/shipping high tech hardware.

From the 4 machines I received (3 months late), all of them had loose screws rattling around in the enclosures. Some of the BBJet boards were only attached with one screw, and hanging from the wiring harness

Quality assembly my ass

Loose screws is one thing, but one of the cases had one long black bolt in surplus, a clear mistake during the mounting of the water cooling


If Ciara is such a great leader in gettings quick out of the door, why have I not seen the Batch #1 MPP ship? Or the upgrade kits? Or the Sierras from Batch #2?

Surely Ciara can keep up with the parts you ship them?

Having a demo unit to show off at conference is not the same as having a mass produced product. So you sold out your EVO Batch #1, why is holding you back from shipping it to your eagerly awaiting customers? You have the parts....
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
Don't let the nam-shub in your operating system.
I feel special, 100% of my posts on the thread were deleted.  If anyone wants I do have copies....

 Cool
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
einc.io
Batch One EVOs sold out almost instantly, so exhibiting your grudge in public hasn't had any noticeable effect.  Better get a Batch Two before they're gone!

If Batch One sold out almost instantly, why are you still stuck at Batch Two?
I suspect you skip Batch One to make it look how succesfull you are scamming people.
Once a thief, always a thief !!!
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
This one must have been a sore point...

Thanks for calling out the windfall seekers who wanted to be in a can't lose/free lunch situation at HashFast's expense.  "Silly" is one of the right words for their ridiculous expectations, but some other ones come to mind given the actions they've taken...

You mean the people who knew BTC was bound to rise and sought repeated assurances from you that you would hold the BTC and they would not be worse off in BTC terms if you failed to deliver on time?


The epic silence now days in comparison from their early days of marketing "hey come preorder our new hashcrap asic miner!". They made a bunch of promises and noise to get your money and now that they have it and can't deliver on their promises they are silent and pathetic.

Alarming and entertaining. These guys are clowns just like MTGOX was.

 Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Hodl!
This one must have been a sore point...

Thanks for calling out the windfall seekers who wanted to be in a can't lose/free lunch situation at HashFast's expense.  "Silly" is one of the right words for their ridiculous expectations, but some other ones come to mind given the actions they've taken...

You mean the people who knew BTC was bound to rise and sought repeated assurances from you that you would hold the BTC and they would not be worse off in BTC terms if you failed to deliver on time?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Jesus guys, almost one post removed out of two.

It must be some kind of record.
Posted from asd, ref#N5uDggitLFlsfIXM
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Quote
Look, post #153. No, wait, it's #275.

153/275 = 0.5563

"Bitter to Better"?

^^ Cheesy
Posted from asd, ref#9wqV8am3P0x2dKGT
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000

Nice. Hashfast is lying in a court brief. Does anybody with the email from Simon want to print it out with headers and send it as a amicus curiae to the address in here? You don't need standing in this case to file it.


http://hashfast.org/Simon_Barber#Promised_Full_BTC_Refunds

http://hashfast.org/John_Skrodenis#Promised_Full_BTC_Refunds
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
I think hashfail_CL's trust rating is still too high. I trust bankers more.

Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 513
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Page after page of alleged cointerra fail...yet cointerra customers have SOMETHING, even if it is rough around the edges. Cointerra's doing pretty good...for an  amerikan company by my estimation. My batch 2 sierra for delivery in November of 2013 on the other hand currently hashes at 0Gh/s in March of 2014. I don't even have a confirmed shipping date and it's FOUR months late.

...any help with that mr. CL or are you far too busy channeling bfl spirit animals?



Seems the Customer Liason didn't like this customer victim's query.

I think hashfail_CL's trust rating is still too high. I trust bankers more.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
It's interesting that ettinger didn't signed that document.
He probably wants to run as far away from the word "hashfast" as possible, given how it would mark his career.
Posted from asd, ref#Ic4WEV81Au6p9dXx

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Quote from: HashFast_CL link=topic=493435.msg5559017#msg5559017
Yes, it is unbelievable that HashFast beat Cointerra to demonstrating a 2TH/s miner, especially since Cointerra advertised "500GH/s" chips and was supposedly the ASIC Dream Team.
Yes, it's unbelievable that you are here giving legal advice to the same customers that you screwed.
Posted from asd, ref#k93x1bn3BpDBNFdm
staff
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
It's really quite annoying that HashFast posted on their thread making it sound like they're doing the write thing wrt me, and when I responded to point out that they weren't infact... they deleted it:

Hello Hashfast, You're saying you've won the race to a 4U 2TH box in the lab, but why should I care about that when you've taken 97.95849881 and failed to live up to your contract to deliver goods by your self-specified deadline or return the funds.  Everyone here can verify for themselves that you have not refunded me: https://blockchain.info/address/1MWwwz9gpViE3u7o6Sx6huYNBrHyze8QrA

Why should anyone purchase more hardware on the basis of your lab-boasting when you haven't made good on your prior commitments?  What reason do people have to believe that you'll actually deliver these 2TH 4U devices when you have simply walked off with people's funds in the past?

What is the relevance of this product offering to the members of the forum? I'm struggling to see it.

Hi gmaxwell,

The relevance of HashFast's EVO product is obvious; it's the highest performance Custom Hardware ever demonstrated.

We sent you a refund check; it was returned.  Maybe you need to visit your Mailbox, Etc more often?

Please let me know if you want another refund check and note that per US law, mail order refunds must be in US dollars.

According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Note)

Quote
Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender, with the words "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" printed on each note.

^^That means if you refuse to accept payment in dollars, your claim is invalidated and the debt extinguished.^^

I'll send you some BTC out of my own wallet if you start doing your Moderator job and banning trolls who won't stop harassing a self-moderated thread, as was done for ActiveMining, BFL, and others.

Hi, My attorney sent the check back— via a certified letter, so I don't know what you're talking about checking a mailbox— because:

(1) The check came with a letter requiring me to agree to additional contractual terms— an NDA, a "disparagement agreement", and consent that accepting the funds satisfied HashFast's obligations— which were not part of our agreement. I do not accept these terms. We have an existing contract in place. You do not get to make additional demands, especially after you are already in default.

(2) Our contract was for a full refund of funds paid if you failed to deliver by your deadline, a fact that I— and others— clarified with your executive staff in excruciating detail— though it was clear in the contract and your communications— specifically because other mining vendors have ripped off other people by collecting funds and then selectively "refunding" in USD if the value of BTC goes up instead of delivering product or refunding the amount paid.  Instead the check for something like $6200 (I don't have it anymore so I don't recall the exact value) which is not even remotely adequate compensation. What you offered was a very small partial payment under onerous additional terms and an agreement that it settled the obligation.  I am not required to accept that and my failure to accept it does not relieve you of any obligation what so ever.

This isn't calvin ball. You cannot insist your customer forfeits their assets because they didn't hop on one leg when you demanded it totally out of the blue after failing to meet your commitments. That you would suggest any such thing is offensive. When people order the EVO mining boards in this thread and the price of BTC goes up will you then forcefully cancel their orders and send them checks that cover only a tiny fraction of the coins they spent and try to argue that they get nothing at all if they don't agree with your "settlement"?  I suppose you will since you are no longer promising full refunds, ... though since your promises are apparently worthless I guess it doesn't matter what you've promised in any case. Maybe it tripply doesn't matter: I can't believe that many people are foolish enough to purchase from you now, I certainly never would have without promises of a full refund making me believe that I was protected from precisely the kind of spectacular failure to deliver which your company has exhibited.

These matters have been pointed out to HashFast in my numerous emails and certified letters. Even in this point you appear to be feigning complete ignorance my numerous attempts to settle the matter in a mutually agreeable manner in accordance with the original contract that I purchased under.
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
two more deletions:

The bad feedback is from people who are upset that I am enforcing gmaxwell's Rules of Conduct for this subforum and keeping this thread on-topic.

They want to break the rules by posting repetitive scam accusations and off-topic personal attacks, but letting this thread turn into another unmoderated troll-fest like the first one is not in the interests of HashFast's customers.  They want to discuss Custom Hardware, not listen the same old stories from the 400GH/s thread retold ad nauseam.

Using negative feedback to express dissatisfaction with a self-moderated thread is silly.  If you don't like self-moderated threads, simply don't read or post in them.

Bullshit

The bad feedback is from customers like me who invested loads of BTC (BTC 430 in my case) and never received the equipment (Sierra, upgrade boards, MPP) you were supposed to ship last year. We are now 3 months into 2014 and there is not even a hint on when (or if) you  are going to deliver on your promises.

In the mean time, you are free to delete my posts but I'll keep posting them again and again in this thread and other threads

A point of order: Conduct in this subforum

How about proper conduct for an ASIC vendor: Stop screwing over your initial loyal customers who pay your wages and funded all your development!

Without us, you would not be having a job. You'd be sitting in your moms basement trying to get your printer to work

How about getting thing fixed, by shipping out the Upgrade kits people paid for a December 2013 delivery. You are now 3 months late.
How about shipping out the Sierras people paid for a December 2013 delivery. You are now 3 months late.
How about shipping out the MPP for the BBJets people paid in Batch #1. The MPP calculation started on the 1st of November 2013 so by the 1st of Feb 2014, the MPP should have shipped. You are now 1 month late, at least. You could have shipped out the MPP together with the BBJets Bach #1 that were shipped out about 3 months late

Why are you taking preorders for another vaporware product you'll never be able to deliver to customers on time?

How about some real business conduct?

Quote from: ?? on ??
What a depressing existence it must be for HashTard_CL. 

Every day he comes in here to tout his bullshit, only to encounter another wave of seriously disgruntled customers, whose posts he deletes.  At what point does he acknowledge to himself that he's got a problem?  Who knows.

He is having a laugh at our expense: he gets paid with OUR preorder money. He is probably very aware of the disgruntled customer base but he prefers to laugh in our face by just taunting us just like BFL Josh shows up at conferences and keeps recruiting new punters.
legendary
Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000
todays deletions FYI

HashFast sent gmaxwell a refund check in early January; it was returned.

gmaxwell, if you want another refund check, please let me know.

How about contacting your current Sierra customers and offering them a refund? You'll never be able to delivery any of the equipment they ordered. Same thing for the upgrade orders.

Admit your failure and refund customers

A point of order: Conduct in this subforum

How about proper conduct for an ASIC vendor: Stop screwing over your initial loyal customers who pay your wages and funded all your development!

Without us, you would not be having a job. You'd be sitting in your moms basement trying to get your printer to work

How about getting thing fixed, by shipping out the Upgrade kits people paid for a December 2013 delivery. You are now 3 months late.
How about shipping out the Sierras people paid for a December 2013 delivery. You are now 3 months late.
How about shipping out the MPP for the BBJets people paid in Batch #1. The MPP calculation started on the 1st of November 2013 so by the 1st of Feb 2014, the MPP should have shipped. You are now 1 month late, at least. You could have shipped out the MPP together with the BBJets Bach #1 that were shipped out about 3 months late

Why are you taking preorders for another vaporware product you'll never be able to deliver to customers on time?

How about some real business conduct?

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 04, 2014, 04:18:04 PM
Now let's go back on topic and discuss how awesome it is for HashFast to get 750GH/s from a single ASIC.

Let's discuss how awesome it would be for customers who paid in September in 2013 to get their equipment. Which we didn't.

How about that?

People: Don't buy from HashFast. You'll never get your equipment on time. It will not perform at 800 GH/s. The current firmware is version 0.4, it does not address any of the fundamental problems the early adopters are suffering from

Don't buy this crap product from this useless company
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
einc.io
Long Dong Johnson and Skropenis will delete your posts in the other thread if you ask about your refunds or MPP.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 37
How amusing. They deleted my question as to whether they were going to refund in Bitcoin as their original B1 contracts required. Also, when exactly does the MPP kick in for the earlier pre-order people anyway?
Pages:
Jump to: