Hell the op could buy three hundred cables this would free one hundred controllers . He would save on space sine the machines would be link in sets of two or three machines his choice .
It allows many spare parts for him
He could even sell a few controllers to the guy that has one dead s-7 due to a dead controller.
I had two s-7 units ran them one one controller.
I shipped 1 s-7 to a friend and ordered a second s-7 just so I can have a spare controller.
Topic: Have 2.311 PH/S rate, PPS P2POOL or PPLNS - page 2. (Read 3003 times)
Thanks for this link, just what I need for mine - if they ever arrive......
one last thing read my thread on the s-7 controller
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/s7-controller-has-nine-18-pin-jacks-so-what-can-we-do-with-it-1173573
with all the gear you have some controllers will fail.
these allow linking 3 s-7's together
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12359304
in your case you have 500 controllers running.
linking the s-7's together is well worth looking into.
333 controllers turned off.
save you at least 3 to 5 kwatts
save you a shit ton of ethernet switches
make your cat 5 wiring much more simple.
I figure you should contact J4bberwock and order a lot of the loner cables from him.
I also figure I just saved you a few thousand dollars with this idea.
see photos in the thread on hook up
tips are welcome
1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/s7-controller-has-nine-18-pin-jacks-so-what-can-we-do-with-it-1173573
with all the gear you have some controllers will fail.
these allow linking 3 s-7's together
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12359304
in your case you have 500 controllers running.
linking the s-7's together is well worth looking into.
333 controllers turned off.
save you at least 3 to 5 kwatts
save you a shit ton of ethernet switches
make your cat 5 wiring much more simple.
I figure you should contact J4bberwock and order a lot of the loner cables from him.
I also figure I just saved you a few thousand dollars with this idea.
see photos in the thread on hook up
tips are welcome
1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje
Go big or go home.
very nice.
very nice.
Always feel free to ask me via pm.
Good luck!
Good luck!
I am taking a stab at p2pool today, might move about 1/4 machines to it to test its mining power.
A good choice!
It's always preferable to use your own p2pool node with another p2pool node as backup/failover. If you need a hand or have any questions with settings etc, pop over to the p2pool thread - we're a helpful bunch!
I am taking a stab at p2pool today, might move about 1/4 machines to it to test its mining power.
And for the record, notlist3d, I have 4 staffs who does the maintenance.
I started mining 6 days ago, it was originally introduced by a friend, but he is not super experienced himself nor have 2PH + of mining power. I am using a public chinese PPS pool, and it's doing alright with about 6+ Month ROI. I have ordered another 300 S7 that will be delivered tomorrow for more stress testing of PPS/PPNLS.
And I never mentioned anything about 11TH + Rate, I mentioned that I have 500 S7 Miners from Batch 1 with hashrate of 4.45TH/s per machine, and with overcloaked I get around 2.31-2.33 PH/s average.
I do apologize coming in here and ask stupid questions like this, I guess it's all about trial and error now.
Thanks guys.
And for the record, notlist3d, I have 4 staffs who does the maintenance.
I started mining 6 days ago, it was originally introduced by a friend, but he is not super experienced himself nor have 2PH + of mining power. I am using a public chinese PPS pool, and it's doing alright with about 6+ Month ROI. I have ordered another 300 S7 that will be delivered tomorrow for more stress testing of PPS/PPNLS.
And I never mentioned anything about 11TH + Rate, I mentioned that I have 500 S7 Miners from Batch 1 with hashrate of 4.45TH/s per machine, and with overcloaked I get around 2.31-2.33 PH/s average.
I do apologize coming in here and ask stupid questions like this, I guess it's all about trial and error now.
Thanks guys.
Use www.kano.is .
+1!
Another idea is to use few pools so you have a more constant income and you are not the victim of bad luck of one pool
Yeah, that's not a bad idea.
770TH/s to p2pool
770TH/s to kano.is
770TH/s to slush
..something something eggs in a basket...
Plus you'll get a clear idea of who pays best over time. I'd suggest using 3 proxy setups, 1 per pool, to make controlling your miners easier.
Yes, use kano.is. Make me some money.
Use www.kano.is .
+1!
Another idea is to use few pools so you have a more constant income and you are not the victim of bad luck of one pool
P2Pool always pays best in the end, but variance is a factor. As long as you understand that, I think p2pool would be best for you. If you want a traditional pool, my vote goes to kano and then slush.
Use www.kano.is .
P.S. can we stay on topic?
Sorry but it's not often that someone new pops up with 500 S7.
I would consider carrying out 5 Simultaneous experiments each with 100 S7 on different Pools / payment systems. For PPS you will get an instant comparison, however for PPLNS you are going have to wait for the tail to work through when you stop mining plus you are also may just end up measuring Pool Luck. Bottom line is that in the long run there is not much to choose relative to setting them up for maximum reliable Hash Rate, and keeping them running 24/7.
Rich
I understand I just signed up, and I don't blame anyone who doesn't believe me. Doesn't matter to me anyways because that's not the message I am trying to deliver.
I have read some articles on PPLNS that if you are running these machines 24/7 you're more likely to earn more than PPS as PPS fees overpowers PPLNS. I am not sure if this is true statement or not, but like I said in the beginning, it's rather more risky for me to switch it all over at once, than hear opinions from people who have actually experimented it.
I will perhaps turn 100 of them to PPLNS and compare earnings to 100 of the PPS.
Thanks.
Just as an FYI, I didn't say that I didn't believe you, I'm somewhat jealous... LOL... I was just surprised by the amount of hardware you have invested in and asking here for best options. Like someone else said earlier, it's not the standard to have a "big player" pop up and ask questions. That said, I wish you luck. I would probably split my hashing power between different pools to try and maximize profit.
I would find it surprising if you have 2.31PH and asking these question's. With this amount if you don't know this I would guess you have a staff for that amount as it is a lot of miners. To be new and go to 2.31 PH is pretty much unheard of.
And we all could be wrong. Just to spend the money for 2.31 PH and not have an absolute grasp would be surprising. Math does not make complete sense you mention 200 units hashing that is 11.5 TH per machine, and I cannot think of a machine running at that currently.
P.S. can we stay on topic?
Sorry but it's not often that someone new pops up with 500 S7.
I would consider carrying out 5 Simultaneous experiments each with 100 S7 on different Pools / payment systems. For PPS you will get an instant comparison, however for PPLNS you are going have to wait for the tail to work through when you stop mining plus you are also may just end up measuring Pool Luck. Bottom line is that in the long run there is not much to choose relative to setting them up for maximum reliable Hash Rate, and keeping them running 24/7.
Rich
I understand I just signed up, and I don't blame anyone who doesn't believe me. Doesn't matter to me anyways because that's not the message I am trying to deliver.
I have read some articles on PPLNS that if you are running these machines 24/7 you're more likely to earn more than PPS as PPS fees overpowers PPLNS. I am not sure if this is true statement or not, but like I said in the beginning, it's rather more risky for me to switch it all over at once, than hear opinions from people who have actually experimented it.
I will perhaps turn 100 of them to PPLNS and compare earnings to 100 of the PPS.
Thanks.
Just as an FYI, I didn't say that I didn't believe you, I'm somewhat jealous... LOL... I was just surprised by the amount of hardware you have invested in and asking here for best options. Like someone else said earlier, it's not the standard to have a "big player" pop up and ask questions. That said, I wish you luck. I would probably split my hashing power between different pools to try and maximize profit.
I really like PPS myself as I can count on a solid number and know what I'm getting. If you like a little more in return PPLNS is best as a lot do at 0 percent, only thing is some can very a great amount per day.
So a lot really depends on pool. But my vote is PPS most of time. Everyonce in a while I do PPLNS, but I like that constant amount.
So a lot really depends on pool. But my vote is PPS most of time. Everyonce in a while I do PPLNS, but I like that constant amount.
P.S. can we stay on topic?
Sorry but it's not often that someone new pops up with 500 S7.
I would consider carrying out 5 Simultaneous experiments each with 100 S7 on different Pools / payment systems. For PPS you will get an instant comparison, however for PPLNS you are going have to wait for the tail to work through when you stop mining plus you are also may just end up measuring Pool Luck. Bottom line is that in the long run there is not much to choose relative to setting them up for maximum reliable Hash Rate, and keeping them running 24/7.
Rich
I understand I just signed up, and I don't blame anyone who doesn't believe me. Doesn't really matter to me anyways because that's not really my point.
I have read some articles on PPLNS that if you are running these machines 24/7 you're more likely to earn more than PPS as PPS fees overpowers PPLNS. I am not sure if this is true statement or not, but like I said in the beginning, it's rather more risky for me to switch it all over at once, than hear opinions from people who have actually experimented it.
I will perhaps turn 100 of them to PPLNS and compare earnings to 100 of the PPS.
Thanks.
The math is actually very simple. You can find a PPLNS pool with 0 fees rather easily. On average you should earn 100% mining profits, what more could you ask for? PPS will have a fee involved, and although you will earn the same amount daily, expect 95 to 96% mining profits due to the fee. So your statistically better to PPLNS mode, but as you said people are greedy, but more than that, they are also irrational.
Throwing nmc profits into the mix with fees on different pools changes this a little bit as philipma mentioned earlier. But to keep on topic, that is the basic math between PPLNS and PPS.
P.S. can we stay on topic?
Sorry but it's not often that someone new pops up with 500 S7.
I would consider carrying out 5 Simultaneous experiments each with 100 S7 on different Pools / payment systems. For PPS you will get an instant comparison, however for PPLNS you are going have to wait for the tail to work through when you stop mining plus you are also may just end up measuring Pool Luck. Bottom line is that in the long run there is not much to choose relative to setting them up for maximum reliable Hash Rate, and keeping them running 24/7.
Rich
I understand I just signed up, and I don't blame anyone who doesn't believe me. Doesn't matter to me anyways because that's not the message I am trying to deliver.
I have read some articles on PPLNS that if you are running these machines 24/7 you're more likely to earn more than PPS as PPS fees overpowers PPLNS. I am not sure if this is true statement or not, but like I said in the beginning, it's rather more risky for me to switch it all over at once, than hear opinions from people who have actually experimented it.
I will perhaps turn 100 of them to PPLNS and compare earnings to 100 of the PPS.
Thanks.
P.S. can we stay on topic?
Sorry but it's not often that someone new pops up with 500 S7.
I would consider carrying out 5 Simultaneous experiments each with 100 S7 on different Pools / payment systems. For PPS you will get an instant comparison, however for PPLNS you are going have to wait for the tail to work through when you stop mining plus you are also may just end up measuring Pool Luck. Bottom line is that in the long run there is not much to choose relative to setting them up for maximum reliable Hash Rate, and keeping them running 24/7.
Rich
I literally have 2.311 PH/S, not 2.311TH/S
I have 500 S7 with overcloaked turned on.
I have 500 S7 with overcloaked turned on.
Not a professional? That's a lot of hardware to be a hobbyist.
I have a good friend that would be willing to set a place up in Washington state. Put in 500k to a million.
He is a retired banker. He knows me for 23 years.
If I were single I would do it for him. He knowledge of bitcoin and asics is just about zero.
Maybe op is like that has money to invest and no place to put it.
World wide 5% interest in a government bond or a bank is no longer easy to find. So a guy with some money to invest could look at btc to set up as an alternative.
At op I think someone is wrong if all your gear is doing 4,450 gh. at freq 600 or freq 606, 612.
tell them to do freq 587. see this screen shot:
I get 4743 at freq 587 with almost 0 errors and since you are looking to max profit with best pool You need to look at maxing your profit with best freq.
do me a favor set 20 or 30 to freq 587 and compare with your others.
http://i.imgur.com/X5ViaMN.png
These are my stats before overcloak.
I will get my guys to set the freq tomorrow and see if it makes a difference. It's currently at 550.
I literally have 2.311 PH/S, not 2.311TH/S
I have 500 S7 with overcloaked turned on.
I have 500 S7 with overcloaked turned on.
Not a professional? That's a lot of hardware to be a hobbyist.
I have a good friend that would be willing to set a place up in Washington state. Put in 500k to a million.
He is a retired banker. He knows me for 23 years.
If I were single I would do it for him. He knowledge of bitcoin and asics is just about zero.
Maybe op is like that has money to invest and no place to put it.
World wide 5% interest in a government bond or a bank is no longer easy to find. So a guy with some money to invest could look at btc to set up as an alternative.
At op I think someone is wrong if all your gear is doing 4,450 gh. at freq 600 or freq 606, 612.
tell them to do freq 587. see this screen shot:
I get 4743 at freq 587 with almost 0 errors and since you are looking to max profit with best pool You need to look at maxing your profit with best freq.
do me a favor set 20 or 30 to freq 587 and compare with your others.
Jump to: