Pages:
Author

Topic: [HAVELOCK]CBCM SHA-256 Mine IPO (cancelled) - page 9. (Read 10171 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250


Thank you for the advice.
The main purpose to diversify pools was to protect the whole project from one pool risks (shut down, hack attack etc.)

Taras

i guess i'm just a fan of small pools (and DGM of course!) - in the end, the choice is yours entirely; best of luck with your venture.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
please can you inform us, to which pool(s) you intend hashing. solo mining? p2pool?

thanks.

We plan to diversify hashing power between several pools including ghash.io (as long as they stay away from 50%), BTCGuild and others.
We would prefere to use any stable low fee merged mining pool as long as it big enough (but not too much) )

Taras

thanks, if you make your target, i would heartily recommend looking at mmpool.org - merge mining, DGM method and adding that kind of hashpower will ensure rounds are not too long. I feel that you would be better using one pool, rather than diversifying; because that would make your accounting a nightmare - different fee structures, different round lengths... just as a FYI, when Icedrill started out they began hashing at ozco.in and were doing very well with it, then they started diversifying - things went downhill from there. I'm not saying your practises will be anything like Icedrill, just giving a heads up on the failures they have made. Spreading hashrate for variance is all very well, but you will find a more stable result by choosing a pool and sticking with it, i think.



Thank you for the advice.
The main purpose to diversify pools was to protect the whole project from one pool risks (shut down, hack attack etc.)

Taras
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
please can you inform us, to which pool(s) you intend hashing. solo mining? p2pool?

thanks.

We plan to diversify hashing power between several pools including ghash.io (as long as they stay away from 50%), BTCGuild and others.
We would prefere to use any stable low fee merged mining pool as long as it big enough (but not too much) )

Taras

thanks, if you make your target, i would heartily recommend looking at mmpool.org - merge mining, DGM method and adding that kind of hashpower will ensure rounds are not too long. I feel that you would be better using one pool, rather than diversifying; because that would make your accounting a nightmare - different fee structures, different round lengths... just as a FYI, when Icedrill started out they began hashing at ozco.in and were doing very well with it, then they started diversifying - things went downhill from there. I'm not saying your practises will be anything like Icedrill, just giving a heads up on the failures they have made. Spreading hashrate for variance is all very well, but you will find a more stable result by choosing a pool and sticking with it, i think.

newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
please can you inform us, to which pool(s) you intend hashing. solo mining? p2pool?

thanks.

We plan to diversify hashing power between several pools including ghash.io (as long as they stay away from 50%), BTCGuild and others.
We would prefere to use any stable low fee merged mining pool as long as it big enough (but not too much) )

Taras
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
please can you inform us, to which pool(s) you intend hashing. solo mining? p2pool?

thanks.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0

Since that's the case, why should I invest in you guys over the PETA operation? I can see their current share price is fractionally higher at the moment (in terms of $ per GH/s), but they already have ~1.2PH/s deployed and are paying dividends.


A few months ago PETA operation was at the same stage as we are now - IPO.
We have to copete and developed a plan how to increase hasing power of each share by 50% during next 3 months.
As you understand that will increase (or keep stable, depending on difficulty changes) weekly dividend payments to each unit holder.

cbcm.co,

what is Your interest in this whole IPO?

As any commercial project we plan to receive profit.
This profit will consist of optimizing and economy in the management of SHA-256 mine.
We will charge fix rate per GHs (decreasing as deployed hashpower growth) and cover all the electricity, maintenance expences and other costs.

Could You place some numbers? 2,9 $/gh at start + 0,2$/gh monthly - this is Your profit? Nothing more?

And what is the lifetime of Your hardware? until profitable?

Our main profit is a small part of fixed $0.2/GHs monthly with lowering this rate as the project growth.
According to our estimates we reach the level of $0.1/GHs by the end of 2014 (mostly because of deployment of more efficient equipment and relatively stable fixed costs).

When miners profit decrease to set point (due to difficulty increasement) we plan to sell them and replace by more efficient one.

Taras
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10

Since that's the case, why should I invest in you guys over the PETA operation? I can see their current share price is fractionally higher at the moment (in terms of $ per GH/s), but they already have ~1.2PH/s deployed and are paying dividends.


A few months ago PETA operation was at the same stage as we are now - IPO.
We have to copete and developed a plan how to increase hasing power of each share by 50% during next 3 months.
As you understand that will increase (or keep stable, depending on difficulty changes) weekly dividend payments to each unit holder.

cbcm.co,

what is Your interest in this whole IPO?

As any commercial project we plan to receive profit.
This profit will consist of optimizing and economy in the management of SHA-256 mine.
We will charge fix rate per GHs (decreasing as deployed hashpower growth) and cover all the electricity, maintenance expences and other costs.

Could You place some numbers? 2,9 $/gh at start + 0,2$/gh monthly - this is Your profit? Nothing more?

And what is the lifetime of Your hardware? until profitable?
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
Anyone investing in this is stupid. Can get better deals for the exact same thing with both PETA & PBMINING, and your wrong, you can sell PBMINING contracts.

If you want to offer an IPO on a mine, you should already have a mine in place, not start from scratch with investors funds  Roll Eyes

As I told earlier.

I respect you opinion but purchasing mining contract you will receive decreasing dividends and probably in 1 year time you receive 1 satoshi per month.
Our offer allows investors to receive relatively stable dividends (due to raising hashpower per each unit) during the whole holding period.

Taras
donator
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1051
Spondoolies, Beam & DAGlabs
This is not endorsement to buy CBCM, but I look at PBMINING cost. The electricity alone for 5 years cost a lot more than the contract cost per $/GHs
Either it is a pyramid or they expect to replace with new hardware at an unrealistic rate. Do the math.

Guy
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Anyone investing in this is stupid. Can get better deals for the exact same thing with both PETA & PBMINING, and your wrong, you can sell PBMINING contracts.

If you want to offer an IPO on a mine, you should already have a mine in place, not start from scratch with investors funds  Roll Eyes
donator
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1051
Spondoolies, Beam & DAGlabs
Nice to know where all the SP10s went.

CBCM are legit. Assuming their first round will be a success, we'll cover it with 35 SP10s we removed from our stock.
We also helped them secured additional hosted hash power in case their subsequent rounds will be successful, from a trusted partner and customer we're working with.

Guy
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
What is your nationality, seem russian ?

I'm Ukrainian.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0

Since that's the case, why should I invest in you guys over the PETA operation? I can see their current share price is fractionally higher at the moment (in terms of $ per GH/s), but they already have ~1.2PH/s deployed and are paying dividends.


A few months ago PETA operation was at the same stage as we are now - IPO.
We have to copete and developed a plan how to increase hasing power of each share by 50% during next 3 months.
As you understand that will increase (or keep stable, depending on difficulty changes) weekly dividend payments to each unit holder.

cbcm.co,

what is Your interest in this whole IPO?

As any commercial project we plan to receive profit.
This profit will consist of optimizing and economy in the management of SHA-256 mine.
We will charge fix rate per GHs (decreasing as deployed hashpower growth) and cover all the electricity, maintenance expences and other costs.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 504
What is your nationality, seem russian ?
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10

Since that's the case, why should I invest in you guys over the PETA operation? I can see their current share price is fractionally higher at the moment (in terms of $ per GH/s), but they already have ~1.2PH/s deployed and are paying dividends.


A few months ago PETA operation was at the same stage as we are now - IPO.
We have to copete and developed a plan how to increase hasing power of each share by 50% during next 3 months.
As you understand that will increase (or keep stable, depending on difficulty changes) weekly dividend payments to each unit holder.

cbcm.co,

what is Your interest in this whole IPO?
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1014
ex uno plures
Nice to know where all the SP10s went.

thats one way to spread the hash around …

~L)L~
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0

Since that's the case, why should I invest in you guys over the PETA operation? I can see their current share price is fractionally higher at the moment (in terms of $ per GH/s), but they already have ~1.2PH/s deployed and are paying dividends.


A few months ago PETA operation was at the same stage as we are now - IPO.
We have to copete and developed a plan how to increase hasing power of each share by 50% during next 3 months.
As you understand that will increase (or keep stable, depending on difficulty changes) weekly dividend payments to each unit holder.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Nice to know where all the SP10s went.

Think they are going to hold onto those for a company that has no funds? If they are holding those miners with out some sort of deposit they are nuts.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Owner, Minersource.net
Nice to know where all the SP10s went.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Just so I'm clear, since I must have misinterpreted your post...you're asking investors to float BTC1,750 (40,000 shares @ BTC0.04375 average over 8 rounds) to start a 1 PH/s mine. Since each share is 10GH/s (as noted in your prospectus and title), you're granting yourself 60% of the total hashrate (600TH/s) right from the start, leaving investors with just 400TH/s?
I think they want to start with 400th (8x5000 shares in IPO) and continue with 'rolling placement'.

During first round we plan raise funds to deploy 400 THs and after start rolling placements to increase total hashpower to 1 PHs by September.

Ah, I got it, thanks for the clarification.

Since that's the case, why should I invest in you guys over the PETA operation? I can see their current share price is fractionally higher at the moment (in terms of $ per GH/s), but they already have ~1.2PH/s deployed and are paying dividends.
Pages:
Jump to: