no offense, but F@H sucks in both GPU saturation and computing itself.
but hell, there offense, really. F@H sucks !!!
*beep*&blinking led*
/pop-corn
My reference 5850 is currently getting a stable 395 MH/s(!) at 1.20v, 1000 core, 180 memory, and 71 degrees.
I am using Phoenix 1.46 and the phatk kernel.
you "forget" to add you GPU power system temperature[not monitored by hardware/software], at that clocks, usually heating up to 95-110'C degrees, or more. so im strongly suggest you to add at least one 120/140mm fan against you GPU on you <-- case cover and/or instal heatsing on you GPU power IC/VRM.
1.2 is serious. esp for reference-alike 3+1, 4+1 power-subsystem.
IMO its safer stay beyond 900, even if its cost you about 50 MH/s.
Then that means you are probably just plain ignorant.
F@H and Furmark is considered to push GPUs to their highest limits.
You can run 3D Mark all day or any games, and your GPUs still won't be as taxing.
In fact, my system pulls 350W with mining at aggression=13, when I fire up F@H or Furmark, it sucks in 30W extra. The temperature also goes up by 10C higher than mining.
wrong! again !!
in not "just plain ignorant", im offensive plaing ignorant
*whoosh !!!* *f-@#%@/useless F&H application/network defeated, anyone happily dances*
note: GPU saturation!=GPU utilisation.
thats why so many "multi-threaded" products, actually wast CPU's cores cycles, instead of profiting from i in CPU-Wolrd and thats why you can't call [for example]FurMark "world best computation application !"
for thats, you need something, actually can/able seriously/very efficently use farmers resources to something useful. which isn't F@H-related project[and affilated forks]case, sloooooowly underdevelopen last years[w/o serious advance ~last 2.5 years]
