Pages:
Author

Topic: Heard about Bitcoin on Aljazeera (Read 2148 times)

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 13, 2011, 04:32:54 PM
#28
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

You sir, are a racist piece of shit, and ignorant to boot. The largest news network in the world is "anti-American"? Idiot...

Regardless of whether or not I personally believe it has an anti-American bias, that's what the public perceives it to be. Also, since when does size mean anything? Fox News is absolutely massive yet has a noted right-wing bias. Size doesn't equal objectivity.

Don't compare Al Jazeera to Fox News, compare it to the Associated Press...it is the main conduit for news media in the eastern world. Size does matter when you view it in context.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
July 13, 2011, 02:01:48 PM
#27
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

You sir, are a racist piece of shit, and ignorant to boot. The largest news network in the world is "anti-American"? Idiot...

Regardless of whether or not I personally believe it has an anti-American bias, that's what the public perceives it to be. Also, since when does size mean anything? Fox News is absolutely massive yet has a noted right-wing bias. Size doesn't equal objectivity.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
July 13, 2011, 01:49:04 PM
#26
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

You have IMHO AJ all wrong. They are not Anti-American and not pro terrorist. In fact, the USG has twice blown up [on purpose] their bureau in two cities for truth telling. It is the USG [and I'm American, if you care to know!] that is the terrorist - with its endless wars only for profit and Empire - its phony war on [really of] Terror. If anyone will try to destroy BTC or anything like it, it will be the USG - or the financial Oligarchy behind them. AJ is the best news service, bar none.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 11, 2011, 12:52:01 AM
#25
you take what the CIA say as the truth so easily?

Yeah wrong thread, PinkiePie.

You want "Make me laugh for a bitcent".


Haha. FTW.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 11, 2011, 12:19:11 AM
#24
you take what the CIA say as the truth so easily?

Yeah wrong thread, PinkiePie.

You want "Make me laugh for a bitcent".
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
July 11, 2011, 12:17:12 AM
#23
Quote
2. Terrorists in Iraq?

It's like I'm talking with 12 year olds.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq

Quote
Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) is a popular name for the Iraqi division of the international Salafi jihadi militant organization al-Qaeda. It is recognized as a part of the greater Iraqi insurgency.

Simply showing reports from CIA releasing documents about aljazeera is the biggest joke in this thread and perhaps on wikipedia, you take what the CIA say as the truth so easily? Those documents(if even real) could be fabricated as pro-american propoganda considering all the documents being released by wiki leaks regarding CIA criminal activity.

Why take the word of the CIA on one matter and ignore reports of their decades long criminal activity?
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
GROUNDED FOR TROLLING
July 10, 2011, 10:39:30 PM
#22
Quote
2. Terrorists in Iraq?

It's like I'm talking with 12 year olds.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq

Quote
Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) is a popular name for the Iraqi division of the international Salafi jihadi militant organization al-Qaeda. It is recognized as a part of the greater Iraqi insurgency.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 10, 2011, 10:32:46 PM
#21
The existence of bias in media should not be remotely new information for anyone who has half a brain. Saying Al-Jazeera is linked to terrorists is like saying ABC News is represented by Timothy McVeigh.

Do us a favor; 1)hit the silk road, 2)get a gram of Fentanyl, 3)snort a line.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
July 10, 2011, 10:31:10 PM
#20
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.
Hey, I don't want to make this a big thing, but...

1. Al Jazeera is a pretty highly trusted news source, plus it's like they say "no such thing as bad press".
2. Terrorists in Iraq? 
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
GROUNDED FOR TROLLING
July 10, 2011, 10:17:04 PM
#19
You can skip over to Wiki and click the links for the original reporting.  This controversy should not remotely be new information for anyone who follows the news even a little bit, even if you disagree with my conclusion.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 10, 2011, 09:57:15 PM
#18
Much better sources.......like Wikipedia?Huh






And the Wall Street Journal??? Owned by Rupert Murdoch? Jesus christ, what is the world coming to. It really doesn't seem like you are joking here...
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
GROUNDED FOR TROLLING
July 10, 2011, 09:01:59 PM
#17
Quote
In May 2003, the Central Intelligence Agency, through the Iraqi National Congress, released documents purportedly showing that Al Jazeera had been infiltrated by Iraqi spies, and was regarded by Iraqi officials as part of their propaganda effort. As reported by the Sunday Times, the alleged spies were described by an Al Jazeera executive as having minor roles with no input on editorial decisions.
On 23 September 2003, Iraq suspended Al Jazeera (and Al-Arabiya) from reporting on official government activities for two weeks for what the Council stated as supporting recent attacks on council members and Coalition occupational forces. The move came after allegations by Iraqis who stated that the channel had incited anti-occupation violence (by airing statements from Iraqi insurgency leaders), increasing ethnic and sectarian tensions, and being supportive of the insurgency.
During 2004, Al Jazeera broadcast several video tapes of various victims of kidnappings in Iraq, which had been sent to the network. The videos had been filmed by the kidnappers holding the hostages. The hostages were shown, often blindfolded, pleading for their release. They often appeared to be forced to read out prepared statements of their kidnappers. Al Jazeera has assisted authorities from the home countries of the victims in an attempt to secure the release of kidnapping victims.[citation needed] This included broadcasting pleas from family members and government officials. Contrary to some allegations, including the oft-reported comments of Donald Rumsfeld on 4 June 2005, Al Jazeera has never shown beheadings. (Beheadings have appeared on numerous non-Al Jazeera websites and have sometimes been misattributed to Al Jazeera.)[92]
On 7 August 2004, the Iraqi Allawi government shut down the Iraq office of Al Jazeera, claiming that it was responsible for presenting a negative image of Iraq, and charging the network with fueling anti-Coalition hostilities. Al Jazeera spokesman Jihad Ballout said: "It's regrettable and we believe it's not justifiable. This latest decision runs contrary to all the promises made by Iraqi authorities concerning freedom of expression and freedom of the press,"[106] and Al Jazeera vowed to continue its reporting from inside Iraq.[107] News photographs showed United States and Iraqi military personnel working together to close the office. Initially closed by a one-month ban, the shutdown was extended indefinitely in September 2004, and the offices were sealed,[108] drawing condemnation from international journalists.[109]
In April 2003, the Qatar channel broadcast a long commemorative program showing ex-General of the Iraqi Republican Guards, Sayf ad-Din Rawi, who claimed that a neutron bomb had been dropped on the international airport of Bagdad during the invasion of Iraq.[110]
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
GROUNDED FOR TROLLING
July 10, 2011, 09:00:06 PM
#16
Wow?  I'm a racist for not liking an anti-American media source funded by a Muslim despot?

Quote
Emmy award winning journalist Dave Marash, who served as a veteran correspondent for ABC's Nightline, resigned from his position as Washington anchor for Al Jazeera English in 2008. Dave Marash cited "reflexive adversarial editorial stance" against Americans and "anti-American bias". [96][97]
In 2004, Accuracy in Media, a non-profit media watchdog group, also criticized Al Jazeera for its "anti-American" stance. [98]
[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera#Anti-American_bias

I strongly urge people to stick with much better sources from around the world such as Sky News or the Wall Street Journal (for financial news) and such.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
July 10, 2011, 03:19:00 PM
#15
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

You sir, are a racist piece of shit, and ignorant to boot. The largest news network in the world is "anti-American"? Idiot...

Amen to that, if we're never open minded and unite with one another how else will any of the newer ideas get out and about so other people will get the chance to hear about them. Racial stereo typing isn't normal, it's only a mere tool that is used to segregate and separate people so they can't work as a team.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 10, 2011, 03:07:41 PM
#14
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

You sir, are a racist piece of shit, and ignorant to boot. The largest news network in the world is "anti-American"? Idiot...
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
July 10, 2011, 01:12:19 PM
#13
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

I'm a U.S. Navy veteran. Do not confuse hostility to the U.S. government for hostility toward Americans. This country was founded by anti-government radicals. You can call a news outlet that refuses to be a propaganda puppet biased, but MSM networks that trade their objectivity for access are also biased. 

In Hollywood, there is a saying: There is no such thing as bad publicity. The opposite of being loved is not being hated. It is being ignored. Lack of awareness, not bad PR, is bitcoin's biggest hurdle right now.
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
July 10, 2011, 12:50:48 PM
#12
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

Your argument is foolish. I understand that you are a self-confessed dopehead so that may explain your skewed perspective.

The US war in Iraq was a war for oil, for natural resources. The US government is the world's biggest terrorist organization and they will crumble, just like all national states. This is a technological revolution which cannot be stopped and which will mean the end of all previous political systems.

Please don't use drugs, it's very bad for that grey matter in your head.
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
July 10, 2011, 11:11:32 AM
#11

That video was pretty cool... I'm looking forward to seeing the next one, but don't know if it's been done/uploaded yet.


What can I say, the news networks worthwhile watching are going to report on the coolest stuff. Grin
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 10, 2011, 10:24:46 AM
#10

That video was pretty cool... I'm looking forward to seeing the next one, but don't know if it's been done/uploaded yet.
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 502
July 10, 2011, 10:02:08 AM
#9
I have mixed feelings about this.  Any news about bitcoins spreading around is good but Al Jazeera has a very bad anti-American reputatation.  They went out of their way to tell the terrorist side of the story in Iraq and as an anonymous currency it isn't a good idea to associate with that kind of thing.  As a libertarian I know drugs should be legal so things like silk road are okay but there should be a way to root out other criminal groups who try and use bitcoin.

Wow this sounds like FOXNEWS reporting.

Aljazeera was totally unbias, the only reason it felt like they gave terrorist view is because PRO-american ie. foxnews,msnbc etc. were only giving American(and only good american) reports.

Pages:
Jump to: