Topic: Heat - Enemy #1, and here's why (Read 2006 times)

The high density environments I am most familiar with are in converted shipping containers. At one animation Studio they run 34Kw/cabinet in every cabinet in specially designed computer rooms. They exist, just not broadly.

High density applications in *some* racks, not in every single rack from wall to wall. The building simply wasn't designed with that in mind.

I can point to three global banks, two media companies, 2 global ad agencies, a computer manufacturer, and an $8B outsourcing company and tell you will the degree of accuracy that only comes from being embedded in their operations groups on projects that the rack loads are 2.4-3.6 today. I wouldn't have believed it.

Contrast that with animation and geospatial (oil & gas) who run 30Kw/cabinet or more for their applications. I have blogged about high density and the HPC markets, and how density will be a bazillion watts a foot, but the reality doesn't support the projections in a broad sense. In pockets, yes. generally, no.

This totally confuses me, let's take the most dense system on the market, the SP31, you are tell me most 42U racks don't pull more than 6K Watts (say single NEMA L6-30P)? I am not sure what rock you are living under but I have been running and/or hosting gear in data centers since the 90s and it was a rare rack that had such a low power usage..

You bumped a 4 month old thread for that?

This is commonly expressed in PUE - Power Utilization Effectiveness - in the data center world. Maybe not the most accurate yardstick, but it measures the overhead of cooling required to cool the corresponding compute load - 1.5 PUE means that for every watt you spend on IT load, you will spend 50 cents in cooling costs. If you look at a data center contract, there is a 'cooling uplift' charge - this is to cover the PUE and associated electricity overhead to provide cooling.

Immersion 2 cooling is below 1.1 meaning that you spend less than 10% electricity overhead on cooling, and 400% less than a typical water or air cooled deployment.

There are two practical ways to mitigate costs - find the most efficient way to manage the concentration of heat from a rig and find the cheapest electricity you can. If that's the goal. One watt generates 3.41 BTU and it is the heat signature that is the issue and insuring as little power goes to run cooling as possible.

Does that help?

Yep. Build your datacenter somewhere really cold.

Anyone have an educated answer to this ? 

2 phase Immersion cooling - the #1 solution to the heat problem.

As of now I estimate immersion cooling is just about as costly as buying an AC. But with specifically designed boards it can be several times cheaper in addition to being significantly more efficient.(less than 1.01 pue vs 1.3+ for AC cooled.)

This will be a very interesting summer for mining. Modern data centers are NOT the solution. Neither are mobile data centers. Lots of deep pocketed miners will lose their ass trying to fit their operation into the current infrastructure. Luckily, there are some really smart people quietly building solutions from scratch in anticipation of the evolving landscape.

I want to see how much additional energy it takes to cool per rig watt.

For example. I wish to keep my rigs in an ambient temperature of 80, when it is 105 outside. It almost seems to me that more energy will be spent pumping the heat out of the room than will be spent on power the rigs.

I don't remember physics that well, but I thought at least an equivalent amount of energy would be spent to remove the heat and even more because of the huge inefficiencies in cooling ?

Anyone good at physics want to answer this ?  Point me to where someone writes it up ?  The link above was more about data centers and not the direct cost related economics of it as they relate to profitability.   (and environmental impact

They are only good if you are the operator of the NOC/DC. For space/cage/by the U leases are better off doing it from home with amp power upgrades or non descript low cost office space lease. Bitcoin mining doesn't necessarily need high avail, fail over systems.

At the end of the day, the lowest cost and the most bitcoin in the pocket wins, no fancy stuff.

What you say makes sense, we are doing so, thank you.

Location: Hong Kong Client: ASICMiner Completion: Oct 2013
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZavKweMrP4
Text: http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/it/is-there-a-liquid-fix-for-the-clouds-heavy-energy-footprint



Because it runs more efficiently, uses less power, and therefor generates less heat.

Ultimately Bitcoin mining is about power efficiency, you switch off a miner when it no longer covers the power cost with what it mines.

Essentially the Antminer S2 1TH is the same chip as the Antminer S1 180GH just underclocked from 2W/GH to 1W/GH by throwing more chips into it.

Despite what many people on these forums believe, or would like to believe, the laws of conservation of energy apply to Bitcoin rigs just like everything else. Is doesn't matter if you use water cooling, forced air or immersion baths, if your kit consumes 10kw you have to get rid of that 10kw to an external sink, be it air or water, somehow. The heat stays, no matter what you do to it unless you use thermoelectric devices, and they're not very efficient.

If you have a flowing river outside, then it can carry away a lot of heat, but the environmental authorities might have something to say about that, can you imagine the public outcry once they realise how many gWh of power are being used for Bitcoin mining? (Currently load is approximately 720Mw - enough for 50,000 homes.)

im pretty sure there are more efficient way then using air conditioner. Anybody have any idea?

Biffa,

You make a clear distinction that I overlook constantly. As a data center guy, I look at things as when the data center fails, people die and/or it costs a company $2,000 per second of downtime. Mission critical goggles are always on. Bitcoin is not in that realm to a large degree (I believe it is changing) and is largely comprised of enthusiasts.

It is not the first summer of mining, but the number of miners who view mining as a get rich quick operation has dramatically increased. People with little or no understanding of computer operation are starting to mine too, and don't understand heat, electricity and cooling. What is also starting to happen is that investors are throwing money at this space and they have a very different and high expectation for operation - especially at scale. My realm is MW of electricity and you're correct that no data center can handle the heat footprint which means it is too expensive to make money. The liquid cooling stuff from Allied Control I think has promise.

As for Iceland, the seismic risk and potential volcanic ash risk will keep me away. My preference would be set up in South America or New Zealand and follow the winter, or just find inexpensive pretty reliable power in a secure building with climate control and/or a BitRack with the A/C units and mine. I don't know why anyone would want to underclock something. Overclock and run em at maximum throughput so you make more. That is where this is headed IMHO - scale, maximum throughput, an arms race for the next 5 years that will be limited by heat, or more Bitcoin share captured by those who can run fast and handle heat.

This stuff is designed to take it the temperature differential, you make it sound like this is the first summer anyone has had to mine coins in. People have been mining on gpu's running at near 100°C (not F) for years. ASIC's aren't so different. In a home environment you underclock or slow everything down or get hosting or whatever it takes to continue with your hobby I think the chances of catastrophic hardware failure due to heat are slim to none. Whats more likely is that the systems will just slow down or shutdown to try and keep cool.

In a datacenter environment the biggest issue is power/heat density, you can't really put 35 1.25U Miners in a 47U rack, there just aren't datacenters with that sort of power footprint per rack available. Its like when blades started coming out, most datacenters were not designed for the rack/power/heat density of blades and had to build self contained blade rooms with separate cooling facilities so that the heat from the blade racks didn't overcome the overall cooling on the floor.

I think that its moving to dedicated mining floors, or specially commissioned datacenters in ultra low electricity cost locations, and even then its going to be touch and go from an ROI pov.

The answer is to mine in Iceland, cheap environmental friendly geothermal energy, and it's cold outside. Everyone is colocating there!

The heat problem is related to GH/W so instead of just selling space per U, you need to add per Watt into your price equation.

A 2U 2kWh miner needs to be paying twice and much as a 2U 1kWh miner to encourage underclocking and more efficient equipment replacement.

It's not just the chips. The boards they sit on, the insulation on the wires, anything plastic in the case, capacitors, and fan blades - those are where the trouble is. That stuff can melt before the data center cooling even enters the equation.

The other thing people overlook is that when you plug in a rig that is cold and fire it up, it goes from room temp to over 100F quickly. Lots of metals and heat sinks, drives, cases, and other components don't do well with a drastic and sudden exponential increase in heat. It cracks things. The A/C inside the facility at 65F if drawn into the case and over the guts of the rigs at 200F can also create a huge temperature differential. That cracks things.

Ideally you look at airflow, you look at SLA's of the facility, and tweak the rigs for the environment you operate in.