WHAT HAPPENED IS THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE GUY HAVING ALL THE GOLD UNTIL ONE DAY IT RAINS GOLD… AND THEN EVERYONE DECIDES TO COLLECT AND DESTROY THE NEW GOLD SO THAT THE ORIGINAL MONOPOLY CAN BE RESTORED
IT MAKES NO SENSE!!!
Topic: HELP CRASH BITCOIN - page 8. (Read 9097 times)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/long-term-sustainability-of-bitcoin-693342
Let's play a game.
You find me these 184 billion coins, and I'll consider your ranting. Trace them from the input address to their final destination, as well as a list of addresses containing 184 billion BTC total.
And Photoshop is easy to spot.
Same with HTML modification.
Timer starts now.
OTHER THAN MY CHALLENGE, EVERYONE IGNORE THE TROLL. "If you and a fool are arguing on the side of a street and a passerby watches you, he won't be able to tell the difference."
Obviously they were deleted!!! DUH!!! Why weren't BTC proportions restarted from neutral at that time?!
Are you this damn stupid OP. Back then, 1 BTC wasnt even worth $1. Gavin was on no one's payroll. There was NO bitcoin foundation. There were no mining companies. It was simply an error which was fixed back in 2010, and they didnt think btc would get to be this big. This is the most useless, troll, thread ever.
the BTC distribution should have restarted by all accounts.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
If it's so bloody fatal, why do we not see 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 artificial coins everywhere?
The issue was solved, and it was reset to preserve Bitcoin, but it may very well have been just to save profits. I doubt the latter, however, as BTC was maybe dollars back then. Not tens or hundreds.
You tried.
No, it was *fixed* so Gavin Andresen could save his boss' money. However, there was no reset, just corruption moving forward in a corrupt manner.
Why would the community decide to launch a separate coin and keep the original owner stakes of that currency as with bitcoin???!! Do you think poor people will actively decide to stay poor and keep the rich wealthy!!!!???
Of course not. The poor will rise up and take what they can from the rich. This is the way of things. The poor are not some cuckold slaves who want to be dominated by those in power. They will reject it.
Furthermore… Why, when 184 billion bitcoins were created as the result of a hack, did the community decide to keep the numbers of bitcoins distributed as they were?? This is ludicrous!! Bitcoin should have been restarted!!! SATOSHI FAILED!!!
Let's play a game.
You find me these 184 billion coins, and I'll consider your ranting. Trace them from the input address to their final destination, as well as a list of addresses containing 184 billion BTC total.
And Photoshop is easy to spot.
Same with HTML modification.
Timer starts now.
OTHER THAN MY CHALLENGE, EVERYONE IGNORE THE TROLL. "If you and a fool are arguing on the side of a street and a passerby watches you, he won't be able to tell the difference."
Are you this damn stupid OP. Back then, 1 BTC wasnt even worth $1. Gavin was on no one's payroll. There was NO bitcoin foundation. There were no mining companies. It was simply an error which was fixed back in 2010, and they didnt think btc would get to be this big. This is the most useless, troll, thread ever.
Everyone, stop replying to this thread. vintagetrex is a bought account and this guy is either a troll, or on some heavy drugs.
Everyone, stop replying to this thread. vintagetrex is a bought account and this guy is either a troll, or on some heavy drugs.
Nobody can deny the levels of corruption in crypto currency at the moment. It is absurd! This has to end somehow!!!
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
If it's so bloody fatal, why do we not see 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 artificial coins everywhere?
The issue was solved, and it was reset to preserve Bitcoin, but it may very well have been just to save profits. I doubt the latter, however, as BTC was maybe dollars back then. Not tens or hundreds.
You tried.
No, it was *fixed* so Gavin Andresen could save his boss' money. However, there was no reset, just corruption moving forward in a corrupt manner.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
In case you havent noticed, that problem was already solved...back in fucking 2010. Take your trolling elsewhere.
Yes, and the proportions of BTC returned to an even distribution? Oh wait, they didn't. In your mind the community "unanimously democratically elected" to award Satoshi Nakamoto 1,000,000 BTC.
Oh wait, Gavin Andresen is on the pay roll of some organization… and he's the one who decided how the BTC would be distributed after the fatal flaw…
Are you this damn stupid. Back then, 1 BTC wasnt even worth $1. Gavin was on no one's payroll. There was NO bitcoin foundation. There were no mining companies. It was simply an error, and they didnt think btc would get to be this big.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
If it's so bloody fatal, why do we not see 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 artificial coins everywhere?
The issue was solved, and it was reset to preserve Bitcoin, but it may very well have been just to save profits. I doubt the latter, however, as BTC was maybe dollars back then. Not tens or hundreds.
You tried.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
In case you havent noticed, that problem was already solved...back in fucking 2010. Take your trolling elsewhere.
Yes, and the proportions of BTC returned to an even distribution? Oh wait, they didn't. In your mind the community "unanimously democratically elected" to award Satoshi Nakamoto 1,000,000 BTC.
Oh wait, Gavin Andresen is on the pay roll of some organization… and he's the one who decided how the BTC would be distributed after the fatal flaw…
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
this will be my last post in this thread.
From the wiki (from Myths section)
From the wiki (from Myths section)
Quote
(myth:) Bitcoin is not decentralized because the developers can dictate the software's behavior
The Bitcoin protocol was originally defined by Bitcoin's inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto, and this protocol has now been widely accepted as the standard by the community of miners and users.
Though the developers of the original Bitcoin client still exert influence over the Bitcoin community, their power to arbitrarily modify the protocol is very limited. Since the release of Bitcoin v0.3, changes to the protocol have been minor and always in agreement with community consensus.
Protocol modifications, such as increasing the block award from 25 to 50 BTC, are not compatible with clients already running in the network. If the developers were to release a new client that the majority of miners perceives as corrupt, or in violation of the project’s aims, that client would simply not catch on, and the few users who do try to use it would find that their transactions get rejected by the network.
There are also other Bitcoin clients made by other developers that adhere to the Bitcoin protocol. As more developers create alternative clients, less power will lie with the developers of the original Bitcoin client.
The Bitcoin protocol was originally defined by Bitcoin's inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto, and this protocol has now been widely accepted as the standard by the community of miners and users.
Though the developers of the original Bitcoin client still exert influence over the Bitcoin community, their power to arbitrarily modify the protocol is very limited. Since the release of Bitcoin v0.3, changes to the protocol have been minor and always in agreement with community consensus.
Protocol modifications, such as increasing the block award from 25 to 50 BTC, are not compatible with clients already running in the network. If the developers were to release a new client that the majority of miners perceives as corrupt, or in violation of the project’s aims, that client would simply not catch on, and the few users who do try to use it would find that their transactions get rejected by the network.
There are also other Bitcoin clients made by other developers that adhere to the Bitcoin protocol. As more developers create alternative clients, less power will lie with the developers of the original Bitcoin client.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
In case you havent noticed, that problem was already solved...back in fucking 2010. Take your trolling elsewhere.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
Except you can't point out where I've lied…
Not a fatal flaw? Being able to arbitrarily create 184,000,000,000 BTC is not a fatal flaw in your opinion?
vitnage, thats because they didnt think Bitcoin would make it as large as it is today, they cant freaking see the future.
Calm your tits.
Calm your tits.
No, its because Bitcoin claims to be transparent and democratic, but it has been corrupt from the beginning. Community members have propagated this lie of equality to get open source developers to work on Bitcoin.
However, Bitcoin is a rat hole investment scheme that utilized the Winklevoss twins as front men to push prices higher. It is the same scam outlined in "The Wolf of Wall Street."
Oh, yea because the first days of Bitcoin, flaws were found as it was the first cryptocurrency ever made, and because it had a few flaws while in early Beta, that means the whole thing is corrupt.
Yea your logic makes complete sense...(sarcasm)
After 1 year of mining and 2 years of vetting the software had a fatal flaw. The distribution of BTC didn't restart tho… Gavin Andresen stepped in to save the profits of the organization paying him.
Yea after 1 year(not yet 2 years), in relative obscurity with only a few individuals(less than 100) even knowing Bitcoin existed. And satoshi only started working on it in 2007, and it was released in 2009. so 2009-2010 is 1 year.
As I said again, they didnt know Bitcoin would reach this far, and the software did not have a fatal flaw.....Talking to you(a troll) who continues to lie is just pathetic. Im not gonna bother responding to your lies anymore. Pce
BTW, what drugs are you high on right now?
vitnage, thats because they didnt think Bitcoin would make it as large as it is today, they cant freaking see the future.
Calm your tits.
Calm your tits.
No, its because Bitcoin claims to be transparent and democratic, but it has been corrupt from the beginning. Community members have propagated this lie of equality to get open source developers to work on Bitcoin.
However, Bitcoin is a rat hole investment scheme that utilized the Winklevoss twins as front men to push prices higher. It is the same scam outlined in "The Wolf of Wall Street."
Oh, yea because the first days of Bitcoin, flaws were found as it was the first cryptocurrency ever made, and because it had a few flaws while in early Beta, that means the whole thing is corrupt.
Yea your logic makes complete sense...(sarcasm)
After 1 year of mining and 2 years of vetting the software had a fatal flaw. The distribution of BTC didn't restart tho… Gavin Andresen stepped in to save the profits of the organization paying him.
The only claim of bit coin's productivity:
"It costs almost nothing to move nothing around the world!!!"
IT MIGHT AS WELL BE A SHAMWOW INFOMERCIAL
"It costs almost nothing to move nothing around the world!!!"
IT MIGHT AS WELL BE A SHAMWOW INFOMERCIAL
vitnage, thats because they didnt think Bitcoin would make it as large as it is today, they cant freaking see the future.
Calm your tits.
Calm your tits.
No, its because Bitcoin claims to be transparent and democratic, but it has been corrupt from the beginning. Community members have propagated this lie of equality to get open source developers to work on Bitcoin.
However, Bitcoin is a rat hole investment scheme that utilized the Winklevoss twins as front men to push prices higher. It is the same scam outlined in "The Wolf of Wall Street."
Oh, yea because the first days of Bitcoin, flaws were found as it was the first cryptocurrency ever made, and because it had a few flaws while in early Beta, that means the whole thing is corrupt.
Yea your logic makes complete sense...(sarcasm)
vitnage, thats because they didnt think Bitcoin would make it as large as it is today, they cant freaking see the future.
Calm your tits.
Calm your tits.
No, its because Bitcoin claims to be transparent and democratic, but it has been corrupt from the beginning. Community members have propagated this lie of equality to get open source developers to work on Bitcoin.
However, Bitcoin is a rat hole investment scheme that utilized the Winklevoss twins as front men to push prices higher. It is the same scam outlined in "The Wolf of Wall Street."
vitnage, thats because they didnt think Bitcoin would make it as large as it is today, they cant freaking see the future.
Calm your tits.
Calm your tits.
please say how the community unanimously elected through democracy to give Satoshi 1,000,000 bitcoins when his software failed
Satoshi charged a very high fee for his services.
Seriously, the large early mining isn't "fair" but he did announce it publicly, so many people think it was done properly.
And then his network failed and rather than fork and restart…
Gavin Andresen (on the take) restores the previous proportions of BTC distribution and continues from there.
Jump to: