Sent to xidram.
The hour has come, so the hash will not appear any more.
Thank you everyone for participating.
Topic: Help me do research - Get 0.01 BTC. (Read 1225 times)
Code: 27823d93572281ff901defe7f04067bb
Address: 1L6miPi3h8xCLPCkcekCLHU3eWxJ93jp1B
Address: 1L6miPi3h8xCLPCkcekCLHU3eWxJ93jp1B
Code: 3a36a47f609f400f9a236c8480a2c976
Bitcoin Address: 3a36a47f609f400f9a236c8480a2c976
If I was able to get the BTC's :p
Bitcoin Address: 3a36a47f609f400f9a236c8480a2c976
If I was able to get the BTC's :p
pinger, the bitcoin address is listed as the hash code..
Sent to gweedo.
Sent to peepee.
I can't fault you for your methods and ideals, especially if they work.
I won't agree with the analogy with open-source projects, however: the biggest downsides I could think of for releasing a program's source while under development are plagiarism - an issue no matter when the source is released - and injection - that is, taking a docile application (say, Electrum) and dropping a payload into it, easier than would be possible without the source. The former is a non-issue in this case for aforementioned reasons, and the latter can be circumvented by simply compiling from the original, untainted source rather than using any pre-compiled applications.
Here, releasing information about the test that isn't necessary cannot easily be redacted. However, the analogy is just that: an analogy, and one that isn't meant to be spotless, and I'm just nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking.
I won't agree with the analogy with open-source projects, however: the biggest downsides I could think of for releasing a program's source while under development are plagiarism - an issue no matter when the source is released - and injection - that is, taking a docile application (say, Electrum) and dropping a payload into it, easier than would be possible without the source. The former is a non-issue in this case for aforementioned reasons, and the latter can be circumvented by simply compiling from the original, untainted source rather than using any pre-compiled applications.
Here, releasing information about the test that isn't necessary cannot easily be redacted. However, the analogy is just that: an analogy, and one that isn't meant to be spotless, and I'm just nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking.
7059ddfff33b8eff60eb04328f65bd81
1EvE8haMoWwet521GZLZTbv8hqQobEEwRD
1EvE8haMoWwet521GZLZTbv8hqQobEEwRD
Sent to camolist and JackRabiit.
Thank you for your interest Matthew N. Wright.
Moshi, I understand the risks of publicly displaying the information before it is "finished".
I believe in open information even in development as it could spread ideas. Just like open source projects are "open" even under development.
This is not the only location where I am getting results from. If you are interested in further results, feel free to spread the test to your friends.
Thank you for your interest Matthew N. Wright.
Moshi, I understand the risks of publicly displaying the information before it is "finished".
I believe in open information even in development as it could spread ideas. Just like open source projects are "open" even under development.
This is not the only location where I am getting results from. If you are interested in further results, feel free to spread the test to your friends.
Moshi, you are right, I did something similar before. I don't believe I have enough data and so I'm trying to get some more with this round. I am planning to have a chart that would eventually approximately fit a function. Already you can tell that the personal preference is usually more cautious than the "Most People" perception.
It's based on a video in the link here - http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality
I believe that behavioural economics is one of the least well know subjects to have been touched by science, and I believe I am barely scratching the surface with this stuff.
It's based on a video in the link here - http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality
I believe that behavioural economics is one of the least well know subjects to have been touched by science, and I believe I am barely scratching the surface with this stuff.
First: recieved the transaction. Thanks, mate.
Second, this might not be heavily into my field of interest, but I'd imagine that, since this is psychological nonsense, you might not want to publish your expected results (in this case, the relation of the two lines to approximate a function) before you publish the actual results. That could easily cause your audience to subconsciously or intentionally skew the results in a certain direction. That, and I'd imagine you're getting these results from somewhere other than this forum: this place is full of relatively like-minded individuals, and in general the Bitcoin community is likely much closer (but not quite
) to masters of probability in comparison to the general public, and that could also skew your results if you're hoping your subjects will take the offerings at face value and not heavily compare them.Wishing you luck, mate; I'd like to see your results when you're finished, if possible.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
259151e389938f77a700871e734c0b4a
Did it out of curiosity. Good luck with your research.
Did it out of curiosity. Good luck with your research.
Eh, Why not
92cf2ae2e6d2e636e1d2b78cd78d8010
BTC address is in my signature
92cf2ae2e6d2e636e1d2b78cd78d8010
BTC address is in my signature
hmm ok why not
490dff54ec7b138340453e6a00be9cd5
16rU5CwWb713ank7a9W4RiidWxZWaTxWSM
490dff54ec7b138340453e6a00be9cd5
16rU5CwWb713ank7a9W4RiidWxZWaTxWSM
Sent to 001sonkit.
fc20685fd07bbcc21d9d4c973ee7729e
1CasperDEhyGD81WNPo9qkaFnWxUSWmrqk
1CasperDEhyGD81WNPo9qkaFnWxUSWmrqk
Code: af1f3d1f5e9aacede7c0be73af4e3f72
BTC: 16ocxdB6V3Ve4AdxgU2fJgXTJAPJ7yY5GJ
Neat question : )
BTC: 16ocxdB6V3Ve4AdxgU2fJgXTJAPJ7yY5GJ
Neat question : )
Payment received! Thanks!
Sent to Maciek, Moshi, wev, juggalodarkclow, D1R1, dresdenreader, and Driice.
Maciek, any amount of forum members can reply here as long as they get in within the hour.
Moshi, you are right, I did something similar before. I don't believe I have enough data and so I'm trying to get some more with this round. I am planning to have a chart that would eventually approximately fit a function. Already you can tell that the personal preference is usually more cautious than the "Most People" perception.
It's based on a video in the link here - http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality
I believe that behavioural economics is one of the least well know subjects to have been touched by science, and I believe I am barely scratching the surface with this stuff.
Maciek, any amount of forum members can reply here as long as they get in within the hour.
Moshi, you are right, I did something similar before. I don't believe I have enough data and so I'm trying to get some more with this round. I am planning to have a chart that would eventually approximately fit a function. Already you can tell that the personal preference is usually more cautious than the "Most People" perception.
It's based on a video in the link here - http://www.veniaminilmer.com/timerationality
I believe that behavioural economics is one of the least well know subjects to have been touched by science, and I believe I am barely scratching the surface with this stuff.
Code: b71093ec817720d862bd58960216d96d
Address: 17QYNmB29dK3SvGUZ6fCs2bEc29sAsVU3B
Thanks man
Address: 17QYNmB29dK3SvGUZ6fCs2bEc29sAsVU3B
Thanks man
Code: af1f3d1f5e9aacede7c0be73af4e3f72
BTC: 16ocxdB6V3Ve4AdxgU2fJgXTJAPJ7yY5GJ
Neat question : )
BTC: 16ocxdB6V3Ve4AdxgU2fJgXTJAPJ7yY5GJ
Neat question : )
Here is my code: a45d388077ffe98967acd2ba19be1373
Here is my wallet address: 1M34TvZ1m5MnCzuzngVuBikeFeGadqYC4F
Here is my wallet address: 1M34TvZ1m5MnCzuzngVuBikeFeGadqYC4F
code: e5cbf60f717f1d2763ab4118d90fe0b0
wallet: 12g7sLVT4zY8HYKD7TChPQt3L4zftGAkgj
thanks in advance!
wallet: 12g7sLVT4zY8HYKD7TChPQt3L4zftGAkgj
thanks in advance!
Jump to: