My Server shut down due to a hardware defect an hour ago and after getting its replacement i cant seem to start up bitcoind anymore:
************************
EXCEPTION: 11DbException
Db::get: DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND: Requested page not found
bitcoin in AppInit()
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'DbException'
what(): Db::get: DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND: Requested page not found
Aborted
Any fix for that?
*edit*
i think it is fixed now.. addr.dat was corrupted..
Topic: Help test: version 0.6.3 release candidate 1 (Read 25671 times)
works nicely for me running on 64-bit Windows 7
and the tray icon finally disappears after I exit the client using the main window's menu.good job!
I'm glad that patch works
. But I thought it would get in 0.7 ^^.Dia
works nicely for me running on 64-bit Windows 7
and the tray icon finally disappears after I exit the client using the main window's menu.good job!
works nicely for me running on 64-bit Windows 7
same... ^
Been using this client since yesterday on Win 7 32 and 64 bit with no problems at all.
Tested the qt client on 64 bit archlinux. Seems ok except that every time I switch virtual desktops and switch back it has minimised itself to the system tray without me doing anything.
Let me guess, other apps that have a tray-option don't do that? Did you try older official releases, same behaviour?
Dia
Tested the qt client on 64 bit archlinux. Seems ok except that every time I switch virtual desktops and switch back it has minimised itself to the system tray without me doing anything.
Let me guess, other apps that have a tray-option don't do that? Did you try older official releases, same behaviour?
Dia
well I am sorry you see it that way gmaxwell
Graet: "Meh" on that. It's getting called a serious vulnerability in part because of the preferences of the person who reported it. I wouldn't have called it that on my own, and it's of a class of DOS attacks that have been discussed in public before.
some other stuff not related
well gmaxwell we need some (oh god again) standards - so ppls opinions have some meaning
if a dev announcves a serious vuln - it shouldnt be a "matter of opinion"
some other stuff not related
Dear gmaxwell, Graet, and all,
The fact that we do not have a standard to describe how severe a vuln is, is the source of the problem. I consider the vulnerability SERIUS (as any other vulnerability) as Gavin posted. But SERIUS is not the same as SEVERE. I don't consider the vuln severe.
I don't remember having pressed anyone to say the vuln had to be called in any way. I just asked for akwnoledgement!
I tried to establish a severity standard in https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vulnerability-bounties-proposal-79830
But consensus was not reached.
I think I will formalize it to help the next time a vuln is found.
Nevertheless the page https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVEs describes the vuln perfectly: "Attacker can disable some functionality, for example by crashing clients".
No more, no less.
Best regards!
And thanks Gavin and the dev team for fixing the vuln for the good of all of us.
been running 0.6.3rc1 on 4 mining nodes for over 12 hours
poolside we are seeing slightly lower stales
no issues so far
thanks devs
poolside we are seeing slightly lower stales
no issues so far
thanks devs
Tested the qt client on 64 bit archlinux. Seems ok except that every time I switch virtual desktops and switch back it has minimised itself to the system tray without me doing anything.
Runs fine on Ubuntu 11.10.
There's one thing that I also noticed in 0.6.2: I can't access the menus (they don't show up when I point my mouse to the gray bar at the top of my screen). So I'm not able to encrypt my wallet..
There's one thing that I also noticed in 0.6.2: I can't access the menus (they don't show up when I point my mouse to the gray bar at the top of my screen). So I'm not able to encrypt my wallet..
Can you post a screenshot?
Dia
Funny, I was about to make a screenshot of it and suddenly the menu was there.
Runs fine on Ubuntu 11.10.
There's one thing that I also noticed in 0.6.2: I can't access the menus (they don't show up when I point my mouse to the gray bar at the top of my screen). So I'm not able to encrypt my wallet..
There's one thing that I also noticed in 0.6.2: I can't access the menus (they don't show up when I point my mouse to the gray bar at the top of my screen). So I'm not able to encrypt my wallet..
Can you post a screenshot?
Dia
Runs fine on Ubuntu 11.10.
There's one thing that I also noticed in 0.6.2: I can't access the menus (they don't show up when I point my mouse to the gray bar at the top of my screen). So I'm not able to encrypt my wallet..
There's one thing that I also noticed in 0.6.2: I can't access the menus (they don't show up when I point my mouse to the gray bar at the top of my screen). So I'm not able to encrypt my wallet..
well I am sorry you see it that way gmaxwell
Graet: "Meh" on that. It's getting called a serious vulnerability in part because of the preferences of the person who reported it. I wouldn't have called it that on my own, and it's of a class of DOS attacks that have been discussed in public before.
some other stuff not related
well gmaxwell we need some (oh god again) standards - so ppls opinions have some meaning
if a dev announcves a serious vuln - it shouldnt be a "matter of opinion"
some other stuff not related
Dear gmaxwell, Graet, and all,
The fact that we do not have a standard to describe how severe a vuln is, is the source of the problem. I consider the vulnerability SERIUS (as any other vulnerability) as Gavin posted. But SERIUS is not the same as SEVERE. I don't consider the vuln severe.
I don't remember having pressed anyone to say the vuln had to be called in any way. I just asked for akwnoledgement!
I tried to establish a severity standard in https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/vulnerability-bounties-proposal-79830
But consensus was not reached.
I think I will formalize it to help the next time a vuln is found.
Nevertheless the page https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVEs describes the vuln perfectly: "Attacker can disable some functionality, for example by crashing clients".
No more, no less.
Best regards!
And thanks Gavin and the dev team for fixing the vuln for the good of all of us.
The Qt GUI gets sluggish on (slow) machines when initial blockchain download is running, this should be resolved or getting way better with 0.7.
Dia
Dia
It still has not finnished downloading the blockchain, started it 02:30:00 a.m. Thursday June 21, 2012 in GMT, current time 01:32:42 p.m. Thursday June 21, 2012 in GMT, with about a 1000 blocks left.
Computer is slugish, opening a terminal takes 20 seconds.
Some outputs of bitcoin-qt from ps with options -F v X s -l:
Top:
Computer is slugish, opening a terminal takes 20 seconds.
Some outputs of bitcoin-qt from ps with options -F v X s -l:
Code:
UID PID PPID C SZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD
user 25359 1 10 201143 252020 2 Jun ? 01:06:50 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND
25359 ? Sl 66:52 2285 7729 796838 251900 24.6 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
PID STACKP ESP EIP TMOUT ALARM STAT TTY TIME COMMAND
25359 97c861f0 97c85950 db750ae3 - - Sl ? 66:53 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD
0 S 1000 25359 1 10 80 0 - 201142 poll_s ? 01:07:02 bitcoin-qt
UID PID PENDING BLOCKED IGNORED CAUGHT STAT TTY TIME COMMAND
1000 25359 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000301200 0000000180014003 Sl ? 67:03 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
user 25359 1 10 201143 252020 2 Jun ? 01:06:50 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND
25359 ? Sl 66:52 2285 7729 796838 251900 24.6 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
PID STACKP ESP EIP TMOUT ALARM STAT TTY TIME COMMAND
25359 97c861f0 97c85950 db750ae3 - - Sl ? 66:53 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI ADDR SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD
0 S 1000 25359 1 10 80 0 - 201142 poll_s ? 01:07:02 bitcoin-qt
UID PID PENDING BLOCKED IGNORED CAUGHT STAT TTY TIME COMMAND
1000 25359 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000301200 0000000180014003 Sl ? 67:03 /home/user/bitcoin-0.6.3rc1-linux/bin/64/bitcoin-qt
Top:
Code:
top - 08:38:23 up 1 day, 16:24, 5 users, load average: 2.09, 2.10, 2.13
Tasks: 138 total, 1 running, 137 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.7%us, 1.7%sy, 0.3%ni, 89.0%id, 7.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1021836k total, 1011456k used, 10380k free, 1680k buffers
Swap: 4192252k total, 150400k used, 4041852k free, 434444k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
23896 root 20 0 502m 34m 21m S 7 3.4 71:47.09 cgminer
25359 user 20 0 785m 254m 43m S 3 25.5 65:36.62 bitcoin-qt
344 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 1 0.0 1:06.77 jbd2/sda1-8
362 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 1 0.0 1:26.02 flush-8:0
22944 user 20 0 19352 1272 920 R 1 0.1 0:00.03 top
Tasks: 138 total, 1 running, 137 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 1.7%us, 1.7%sy, 0.3%ni, 89.0%id, 7.2%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1021836k total, 1011456k used, 10380k free, 1680k buffers
Swap: 4192252k total, 150400k used, 4041852k free, 434444k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
23896 root 20 0 502m 34m 21m S 7 3.4 71:47.09 cgminer
25359 user 20 0 785m 254m 43m S 3 25.5 65:36.62 bitcoin-qt
344 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 1 0.0 1:06.77 jbd2/sda1-8
362 root 20 0 0 0 0 D 1 0.0 1:26.02 flush-8:0
22944 user 20 0 19352 1272 920 R 1 0.1 0:00.03 top
"highly offensive" and "entitled" ?
Yes, entitled,— where you expected to be contacted privately in advance of the "announcement". (Never mind that the stuff in question has been public for a while)
Quote
Some people talk about getting standards in place - some don't seem to care so much, for over a year I have been idling in -dev and seen the "standards" topic come up over and again
I have no clue what you're talking about there. My grepfu fails me because I can't find anywhere where people have asked about that. Also, I still don't understand how you think my personal preferences proves a lack of uniformity— preferences differ. I also still don't understand your argument about about the classification being unclear since it was described specifically in the announcement instead of just being given a class. ::shrugs::
Working fine on Windows7 32bit.
btw, just updated zh-CN translations.
btw, just updated zh-CN translations.
Translation updates are no critical fixes, but new translations will be in 0.7.
Dia
Working fine on Windows7 32bit.
btw, just updated zh-CN translations.
btw, just updated zh-CN translations.
Jump to: