Pages:
Author

Topic: [HELP] TRUST ABUSE BY PLAGIARIST / DT MEMBERS PLEASE HELP - page 2. (Read 523 times)

member
Activity: 185
Merit: 34
I've excluded both Jeremy Franklin and SiNeReiNZzz. This fixed the DT2 red rating that was inappropriate, but so is red trust for plagiarism. Plagiarists should be reported to moderators. Even if moderators disagree with you, it's not ok to use the trust system to enforce forum rules unless there is an actual trade risk involved.

thanks, I remove my negative feedback from SiNeReiNZzz. I only gave it because my report for plagiarism is unhandled for weeks.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
The account changed hands several times and just woke up to participate in signature campaigns...

Now he post in german (see recent posts...)... in 2016 he posted in pilipinas....
I'm not sure what that "manual recovery previously queued ownership change completed" means from BPIP, nor do I know how much weight it has as evidence that the account changed hands.

So he's currently posting in German and used to post in the Philippines section, right?  I have those sections on ignore and thus couldn't see his posts when I checked his history.  I'll un-ignore them and go back and take a close look at his posting history.

If any other members (particularly DT) care to weigh in, I'd like to hear some opinions.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I've excluded both Jeremy Franklin and SiNeReiNZzz. This fixed the DT2 red rating that was inappropriate, but so is red trust for plagiarism. Plagiarists should be reported to moderators. Even if moderators disagree with you, it's not ok to use the trust system to enforce forum rules unless there is an actual trade risk involved.

Jesus Christ, does the DT list have zero meaning anymore or what?

SiNeReiNZzz was recently added to DT2 by YOSHIE, whom I don't really understand 90% of the time so I don't know what's going on there.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
1. The feedback you left on his profile wasn't also necessary IMO. If you are appealing for proper usage of trust ratings. Then you should lead by example by not misusing it. What you would have done was report the perpetrator to the mods for plagiarism or make a report here on Reputations board about his wrong doings and members would help you out on the way forward

2. His feedback is unwarranted as well and there's no reason to trust this person. I see he's already on DT2. I am considering distrusting him. This is not the way negative feedback should be dished out.

This is part of his trustlist. Might help pain a picture on why he is on DT2

Quote
SiNeReiNZzz's judgement is Trusted by:
1. HardyGoodsLtd (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~SiNeReiNZzz's judgement is Distrusted by:
-
Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 34
He's been here since 2014 and doesn't know how serious plagiarism is here?  If what you say about this account changing hands, I'll be happy to give him a red tag.  And yeah, I'm not sure why he hasn't been banned already.

Jesus Christ, does the DT list have zero meaning anymore or what?

The account changed hands several times and just woke up to participate in signature campaigns...



https://bpip.org/Profile?p=SiNeReiNZzz

Now he post in german (see recent posts...)... in 2016 he posted in pilipinas....

kamusta mga paps.. xnxa na kung matanong ako kung ano kaya pinakamagandang altcoin sa ngayon. taas na kasi ng bitcoin...


balit ko eth daw ngayon ang magandang bilhin paps kase patuloy pArib ang pag taas nito after ng august 1. nandiyan na din ang bagong silang na altcoin ang bitcoin cash pwede mo din i try yan , sikat na sikat pa ngayon yan kase bago palang. pero pag aralan mo parin muna ang galaw ng coin sa market bago ka mag invest para sure ka at hindi ka magsisi sa huli. sabi nga nila never invest what you can afford to loose. gudluck nalang sayo paps.

magnda talga ang etherium mga paps isa na din sa stable coin yan , malaki laki na din value nyan kahit papano e since maganda na presyo at stable sya kaya yung iba advice nila din na eth na pag invesan.
Bukod kasi sa waves, isa rin ang ETH sa may maraming nga platform based na ginagamit sa mga ICO at iba pang mga projects. Maganda rin i trade ito for long term, kasi kung mapapansin natin ang chart humahabol siya kapag tumaas ang worth ni bitcoin, kaya madali rin nating ma conclude na kung tumaas si bitcoin ay malamang tataas din si ETH, at isali narin sa usapan ang purpose ng ETH or uses nito.

legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 2248
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
The feedback left by SiNeReiNZzz is an abuse of the trust system in my opinion, trust feedbacks are not a way to get back at other members whether or not you were wrongfully accused.

He clearly deserves to be out of the DT circle and a red trust for his plagiarism.
Red trusts is not the penalty for forum offences, such offences are moderated and should be handled by the mods, in extreme cases where a user poses an immediate threat to the community (like when an account is hacked) red trust can be used to warn other members, I however do not think it should be used in cases like this.
Did you report the post in question to the mods? This usually draws their attention faster than posting in the report thread, you should note that cases are handled individually and other factors go into the final decision with mods allowed to use their personal discretion when handling cases, so it might take a while for a decision.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
That dude is on DT?  I'll have to take a look into that.  This quote from the other thread struck me as a load of excuses and victim-playing:

It's just a pity that I'm not addressed personally (not even parallel to the public accusation) in order to be able to correct misunderstandings, possible mistakes or misfortunes.

I must honestly say that I'm a little perplexed!
A forum ban would be sad, but also no end of my life...
In my case I see a small difference to real copy and paste plagiarism. But maybe I just want to see that!
But okay if you are so determined to fight against such practices, I can understand that, because there is a lot going wrong in this direction.

He's been here since 2014 and doesn't know how serious plagiarism is here?  If what you say about this account changing hands, I'll be happy to give him a red tag.  And yeah, I'm not sure why he hasn't been banned already.

Jesus Christ, does the DT list have zero meaning anymore or what?

Oh by the way, OP:  the feedback he left for you was not appropriate IMO and I'm going to exclude him from my trust list. 
member
Activity: 185
Merit: 34
Hi all,

I am reaching out to all DT members to please check my case:

A few days ago I gave a negative feedback to the user SiNeReiNZzz.



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=251328

My feedback was based on this reason:

I can't tell for sure if it's plagiarism or not, but this post looks "from another world":


Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
In addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.

Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.

Archived: http://archive.is/MEOGw

Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko



Why is this user in DT and not banned from the forum? SiNeReiNZzz is a plagiarist and I don't buy his excuses. He tried to clear up his post and added a source later on. Moreover he gave some lame excuse that he used the text some years back in university when he wrote an article about the topic. Obviously nobody was able to verify that and I don't believe him. See the archived post for full information.

For my feedback SiNeReiNZzz gave me a revenge feedback with is a obvious trust abuse. He is also insulting me:



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2383451


My question to all DT members is: Why am I the person who is getting a negative feedback here? SiNeReiNZzz is a DT2 member and his feedback seems to count.



https://bpip.org/Profile?p=SiNeReiNZzz

He clearly deserves to be out of the DT circle and a red trust for his plagiarism.

Dear DT members please help me.
Pages:
Jump to: