Topic: Help us to choose a bonus for a review campaign! - page 2. (Read 595 times)

This depends on the manager who is handling the event.  The manage can always disqualified people who lied or sugarcoat  their experiences.  Besides, I think the review is about the user experience on the site which includes UI interface, deposit and withdrawal process, the customer support experience and a lot more which needs a real life experience engaging with the casino platform. This is also one way of the casino to check where they need to improve.  This can be compared to bug hunting but this time it is on the user experience aspect.

About the rewards, I don't mind in what form it is, a free bet, a cash incentives in form of BTC or valuable altcoins such USDT, ETH or anything that have good market liquidity, does not matter as long as there is no wagering requirement if it is rewarded on the casino platform.

Just give bitcoin or dollars and you are good to go for reviews.

In connection with recent events on the forum (bettercallraul signature campaign), bonus or better say reward for review campaign can be anything that can be transparent and proved a fact of its existence. Reward in Bitcoin is simplest, as it can be escrowed. If it is free spins, then reviewers must receive them before making review. It can also be free bets. The difficulty of this review campaign then would be choosing 15 reviewers properly.

I don't think there's anything wrong with mentioning the topic you're talking about regardless of what someone might think we're doing a promotion for a competing casino.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61603346

It is a really good example of a review campaign that can help Team_MegaPara in making their decision.

I agree with the majority's recommendation that the rewards be sent directly to the reviewers' wallets via Bitcoin. Based on my personal experience, past review campaigns that offered bonuses and free spins are not worthwhile because the amount that may be withdrawn would still depend on your luck as a result of those rewards.
It would be more practical to reward participants Bitcoin and allow them to pick whether to use it for investing, trade, or gambling. To ensure that it would be worth paying for, you must ensure that you will need a good quality review. I also believe that you must hire a reliable manager to run your campaign.

well, you only saw a few comments and already drew conclusions, you already ran a signature campaign here on the forum and the signature campaign ended, I think that the participants of the signature campaign that your casino ran can see and analyze your casino, And what your team had to do was research your casino ssignature campaign members for the following:

1 - how many members of the signature campaign run by your casino used your casino to play?

2- how much money did members of your ssignature campaign spend playing at your casino?

3 - what were the games they liked to play the most?

4 - how much money that did not come from signature campaign earnings did members of the signature campaign run by your casino deposit in your casino, is it important that you know this?

you need to know the level of satisfaction of the members who can use your casino for some time, there is no point in creating a review campaign because the people who will participate in the campaign are people who will only use your casino for something like less than 3 hours only, that and little time to get to know every casino, you should have better talked to the subscription campaign manager when your signature campaign was running so they could have answers to those 4 questions I mentioned. It is important to explore marketing well. the signature campaign will be effective with a good strategy, for example: payments must be made directly into the account they have in your casino so that you have greater retention of people in your casino, in short, there are many strategies that you are the campaign manager signatures had to have implemented to be successful in the long term

another example:

🔵🔴 MEGA:PARI Question Quest: Answer Right and Score Free Bets!

It's a good strategy, but you have to explore topics that are attractive, such as NBA, UFC, Premier League games. if yesterday you had done for example the following:

prediction contest

predict will be the winner of the coppa italia and get $10 free bet

requirements: you have to bet 5$

there will be champions league matches, europe league, these are the kind of contests that attract people

The only bonus I see is a reward (fixed or dependable from the review) in Bitcoin on users wallet. Free spins, free bets, deposit bonus or on account and etc wont looks like a real reward, because users will test the platform while making a review, and forcing them to stay on your platform with bonuses does not look good. If they like it, they will return there anyway.

I think each user has their own opinion about review campaign, if you're not familiar enough in this forum and how to launch a successful review campaign, I recommend you to use hire a campaign manager, they're more familiar and know a way to promote it.

However in the end, it depends on how much money you want to spend, large is better than small.

OP, you should consider what was said by: @Trofo and @mindrust, their suggestions are common for crypto casinos here, if you want participants to improve your casino reviews.

If you are considering a bonus for participants participating in a 'REVIEW CAMPAIGN' that you would like to form and you are rewarding them with a bonus in the form of sports betting or playing in certain games in your casino, they may not be so interested in becoming a review participant, bonuses in the form of Bitcoin should be considered. with betting and deposit limits.

@Trofo has done a review for the casino here, he did something good and fun, all the review participants he received have a happy heart.

Many of us have suggested giving rewards in the form of BTC, which is a good recommendation, especially since BTC is the main coin in almost all the crypto casinos we use. As for the reward, I think it depends on how much money you want to use for the reward because some casinos give a reward of 5 mBTC. And you are free to determine the amount, but you should not be too small. And for the review, perhaps, you need to determine what to review so that the participant's review is not too broad.

Perfectly said, in addition ro what had been given already, it all depends on the financial strength of the platform to choose a particular rate they can afford to offer participants that have made review on their site, the number or participants they will accept review from and also set a criteria for making such review, there's nothing bad in getting a feedback on your performances as a casino, just to be able to serve people better.

Since you are looking for a limited amount of participants and reviewers, you should get a fixed budget for it and make it either in BTC or in a stablecoin which would then provide the winners the opportunity to purchase the cryptocurrency of their choice if they want or they can simply convert it to fiat through a P2P service if they need funds.

Paying this way will increase the chances of you getting the best reviews since people usually tend to work harder if they know they are going to get paid for their work, so if the budget is good enough for each participant, I'm sure it will be a successful campaign for you.

I guess with such bonuses or rewards for a review campaign, nothing beats the actual balance(BTC) that you'll give to the participants. I've seen such campaigns and you can be the one to decide how much you're going to reward the reviewer based on the review that has been made.
I think that's fair enough and you should give a range on how much the reward will be so that participants will have an idea on how much the reward will be if ever they're expecting the lowest or highest or even in between rewards that shall be rewarded to them.

From what I understand from the op, one wouldnt necessarily have to deposit to the casino to be chosen among the qualified reviewers, what op is interested in is the preferred payment method to users for their review, op is looking at awarding some kind of Casino bonus to the reviewers for their Review, the bonus could be any type of bonus, not necessarily a deposit bonus in particular..

But like the comment you quoted said, a bitcoin payment is the most appropriate and worthy payment for reviews, not a casino bonus, Many of us are not interested in casino bonuses since most times, they come with several strings attached.

   -  I support your suggestion on this mate, to keep the fight clean and fair when making a review here on something OP wants to happen. Because there are many people who tried to do this who did review the campaign but the only qualified ones are those who will deposit money on their platform.

it will look like you paid for being a participant in a review campaign, which is not a good strategy for someone running a review campaign here and what others have said here is also correct that it is better and nicer that a reputable manager should also hold or supervise because it is an advantage to easily attract communities that will support what OP wants to promote in the forum.

For me, the only way you are going to get quality review is if you will be paying for the review in bitcoin, several other casinos and businesses has in previous times ran review campaigns here on the forum, and they all paid in bitcoin, you could pay reviewers depending on their rank, like the one I was invited to join of recent, pays senior members $20 for their quality review and pays hero/legendary members $30, and if you see the spreadsheet of the reviewers, several high ranking and reputable members of this forum joined.

So if really you want a reviewer that is thorough and straight from a user's heart and experience of your platform, not particularly for the money, pay for it in bitcoin.

is there any chance to tell when this be happening ?  because you will only ask for 15 person but isn't it best to exceed from that counts?

[/quote]

I second your motion mate. Requesting for a possible rewards payment option is OK but atleast it would be nice they telling us when the event would take place too. Well, it is not too late as they just put up this thread and from the looks, they  must have made up their mind on the possible type of rewards to put up for the  review payment which is not bad. Requesting from the forum members their possible opinion on rewards looks good because it shows the voice of their clients or customers really matters to them and it is a good one to start with and they also value their customers. This is a sign of a good customer service from the mega pari team.

It seems that most members here is focusing to suggest what currency is the best for the reward but not many members suggest about what kind of bonuses is the best. There are many type of bonuses that can be given as reward for review campaign such as cash reward, free spins, free bet, or maybe other benefits that are available in the site. In my opinion, cash reward is the best one because it is a guaranteed money for the reviewer for their work to review the site. But maybe there are some other people who prefer to get free spins or free bet because the value can be bigger if they are lucky enough with the free spins or free bet especially if there is no wagering requirement for these free spins or free bet.

Count me in. I'm willing to review your casino the best way I possibly can. Like others said it's the best practice to send the amount to the personal wallets of the reviewers because you know that reviewing is a difficult thing and it requites time and testing of certain things. The reviewers can give their review even if they are not into gambling and if you only offer them free spins or bets as rewards then I don't think they will agree.

If you really want to have good and high quality reviews for your site then you should send the Bitcoin to the personal wallet of the reviewer and at the same time you should provide free bets and spins to the reviewers for the testing purposes. That way you will be able to get genuine reviews for your site and you'll be amazed with the quality.

Now back to my application, I will review the site so carefully by devoting much of my time to it. The review will be very detailed and will include my personal point of view regarding the services of the site. The review will include both pros and cons because I'll only share my personal opinion after testing the site and that might include some cons as well if I find any.

The bonus prize that most gamblers want is in the form of Bitcoin because indirectly by using Bitcoin we have also adopted it.
After all, Bitcoin is the currency that gamblers like the most when playing or betting, even for them to make deposits or withdrawals.
Even though the cost is somewhat more expensive, at least Bitcoin will be a bonus that seems amazing.
I also see a lot of feedback suggesting the use of Bitcoin.

A little question about the 15 participants, How would you choose the 15 participants so that it really looks fairer?