Topic: Help us to choose a bonus for a review campaign! (Read 617 times)

Indeed, most people here for prizes of reviews are Bitcoin which is the best payment tool, I see the average person here choosing Bitcoin as a gift payment.
Free rounds are quite interesting for a gift, but I don't think it will be effective and if you think of who wants a free round that has no value or with a small bet.

I think it must be done officially, and or hire a manager to manage it so that everything is well controlled, but the impression is like a contest, I don't expect it like that.

For the rewards still people will prefer with the bitcoin, for additional rewards seems like ideal is the free spins, or bonuses for the events.

You can run too an event like bug bounty hunting to help your developers check what the possible hole in your system. If you want to have unique reward have a physical reward like Hardware wallets to the top reviewer

clearly all the campaign reviews I had participated in paid in Bitcoin, u might decide to do the same, you could have a fixed amount for every one such that, after the reviews, we get paid.

I've seen most mates suggesting spins, it's a good one too, but don't you think that'll mean making payments before reviews??
How many person would be genuine enough to do that

Any idea what have you decided from all of the answers given here?

I think considering Bitcoin is the majority of answers and I also second those , but there are also some advise that can be considered such as the last one here.

This is what I love to experience mate  , lol VIP privileges as an incentive 

Bunch of us forum folks love good old Bitcoin and altcoins for our casino review efforts. Right? However, imagine a cocktail of rewards - now that's exciting! Picture this - free spins, VIP privileges mixed into an irresistible incentive martini! It's like the casino clapping back, "We value ya!" and putting its money where its mouth is.

Think about a solid cash prize, wired directly into the reviewers' crypto wallets or casino bankrolls. Popular idea, right? But how about a twist - a review derby! Top dogs share a meaty chunk of the winnings, and the rest get a slice up to a certain quota. Boom! That's an influx of rich, thoughtful reviews.

And hey, laying out clear-cut review rules? That's your seal of quality. Take a page out of other successful review campaigns from our forum - it's a gold mine of insights! Cash, perks, competition – at the end of the day, it's all about amping up your casino game.

   -  You said that right and I agree to be honest. Because it's really different when Bitcoin is used to pay for the rewards of those who will participate in the review campaign that will be conducted here. Or if the campaign owner doesn't want it, I think Dollar is the second option.

In fact, there are also other casinos because I see that before they start here in the crypto gambling industry, they first look at the reviews of others through the honest words of the old people here on the forum platform before they open a casino. so that they know what is the right step to take, which I think there is nothing wrong with that.

We have seen multiple reviews conducted by each site in the forum , for my years here ? yes there are still members that willing to give their trusted reviews even if they are paid upfront or later because it is not only the site credibility that they are talking but also their own credibility and the potential victims if the casino did not perform right.
wrong mate , there are still forum members that willing to give reviews even without payments , yes it is hypocrite not to seek for money or payments each reviews we made but sometimes the need of payments is depending in which casino we are dealing and how we find that casinos worth.

Btc is best form of payment for any campaign here in the forum and i will advice the team to pay for the review campaign using bitcoin and since most review campaigns pay $40-$50 I think increasing our reward is not bad also let say you pay 100 that will make the team stand out and get the best hands.

For sure mate, and I agree with you, in my first and second comments here on this thread, Ive categorically said that bitcoin payment is the best, as long as the review campaign will be posted in the bitcoin services board..

But if the organizers chooses to pay in some random altcoin, rest assured that the campaign won't be posted on services board, but will have to move it to  bounties board in the altcoin section, but I don't think such a move will create the much needed awareness which is the major reason for the review campaign in the first place.

A manager might have their say or suggest things that might be better based on their experiences on the forum, but generally, the decisions are made by the team that the manager is working for, even in signature campaigns, the team is the one who decides everything maybe apart from some of the rules that are set by the manager himself.

That being said, they are probably just looking for suggestions to decide what they would like to do with the campaign and once it is finalized, they will probably hire a manager to get it done the professional way.

Hi OP
definitely a bonus in btc would be fine (maybe if payed directly to wallet user and not as bonus loaded in account of gambling site). If you send one payment to all participants you can save a lot of fees (or much better ask to someone to escrow this amount...)
Or use Lightning Network! Its also a cool solution to avoid high fees.

Find a reliable bounty manager like @icopress or @Hampuzz or @sujonali1819 (just to mention some of the best...) to have some suggestion and to get their support in management.

Choose wisely participants: high trusted/rank it should be a must. Provide early a checklist of items you want receive a feedback.

Indeed, it's true that some members may prefer altcoins with lower transaction fees, particularly given the current state of the Bitcoin network. However, in this particular case, as we are on the bitcointalk.org forum, I believe that Bitcoin holds an advantage. Campaigns that offer Bitcoin as payment can be promoted in the Services section, which typically sees higher attendance and greater interest, as opposed to being relegated to the Altcoin bounty section.

First and foremost, I don't think megapari have an internal token, if actually they did, then how come they never talk about it,? Would be nice to know and maybe invest in it..

Secondly, I personally think it would be best for them to go with one reward system, allowing users to choose the type of reward they want after submitting their reviews will only inconvenience the organizers of the review campaign, it's not ideal if you ask me, better to go with Bitcoin payment for everyone if that is what they choose, or go for payment by gift card to everyone if that's what they choose as well.

What makes you think that majority of the people would want to give a negative critique report when incentive is attached to the review process. In real sense what @goldkingcoiner is trying to say is that, no mouth would want to bite the hand that feeds it. Hence, most reviews might not be out of transparency of mind but for the sake of the box.

Am not in anyway discouraging or against paying for reviews but how can we really know which review is genuinely from the heart without bias and another which is actually bias. That's where a balance becomes an issue.

What ever reward you have to offer sbiukd be monetized and paid in bitcoin  and if I'm to suggest a reward to be given to me for a honest  review then I will possibly suggest payment in BTC  as well as free spin  or welcome bonuses.
But a little more advice is that when you finally launch your review  campaign,  you should try as much as possible to make it flexible and easy to claim the rewards, hence payment  should be made in bitcoin and I also understand  that the people's  opinion  truly matters alot and at such, whatever its written in the  review campaign should be take into consideration  as these are peoples  genuine reviews.

^The bolded part above.
I think this is right because there are also people here who don't want to gamble but they will think giving a good review in exchange for what they get is also good. This option would be beneficial for those who may not be interested in gambling anymore but still wish to provide honest reviews about casinos or related services. Giving users the choice to receive only BTC that fitted with their personal preferences and allows for a more surprise award in a reward system.

Bitcoin will be the crypto that they want to receive after giving an honest review. If not then BTC + Free spin or BTC + Free bet as what discussed before is what many people would like to receive. I also think it's also better if they can choose to receive only BTC instead of BTC + Free Bet/Spin because some people might be not into gambling anymore but still giving reviews to casinos honestly. Other crypto won't be a problem but I am more on receiving incentives with BTC.

Although this is a Bitcoin forum, I do not think that there will be a difference of attraction between the reward of Bitcoin and USDT, or any stable coins.  Since the amount will be the same I do not think those who wanted to participate will find it less interesting if the reward given is in terms of stablecoins.  Honestly, I find it more interesting if the reward is a high liquidity altcoins like TRX, LTC, or Dogecoinm that has low fee transactions.  This way I can save more on transaction fees. 

I agree. There is no better incentive to attract quality forum members to review your casino than the promise of bitcoin. You can't expect everyone to be excited about free spins or free bets but offering them the opportunity to earn BTC is something that many people will jump at the chance for. I mean, all these people are already hardcore gamblers and they already have a lot of experience in this industry. So if you want to attract them to your casino, just stick to bitcoin!

If you want that people will become more interested in it, stick to bitcoin. I think that’s the best bonus that majority of the people are waiting of. And a lot of review campaigns have been using bitcoin already and most of them have been successful so far. So never doubt the potentials of bitcoin as it could attract thousands of participants like it always did to previous review campaigns.

This depends on the manager who is handling the event.  The manage can always disqualified people who lied or sugarcoat  their experiences.  Besides, I think the review is about the user experience on the site which includes UI interface, deposit and withdrawal process, the customer support experience and a lot more which needs a real life experience engaging with the casino platform. This is also one way of the casino to check where they need to improve.  This can be compared to bug hunting but this time it is on the user experience aspect.

About the rewards, I don't mind in what form it is, a free bet, a cash incentives in form of BTC or valuable altcoins such USDT, ETH or anything that have good market liquidity, does not matter as long as there is no wagering requirement if it is rewarded on the casino platform.

Just give bitcoin or dollars and you are good to go for reviews.

In connection with recent events on the forum (bettercallraul signature campaign), bonus or better say reward for review campaign can be anything that can be transparent and proved a fact of its existence. Reward in Bitcoin is simplest, as it can be escrowed. If it is free spins, then reviewers must receive them before making review. It can also be free bets. The difficulty of this review campaign then would be choosing 15 reviewers properly.

I don't think there's anything wrong with mentioning the topic you're talking about regardless of what someone might think we're doing a promotion for a competing casino.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61603346

It is a really good example of a review campaign that can help Team_MegaPara in making their decision.

I agree with the majority's recommendation that the rewards be sent directly to the reviewers' wallets via Bitcoin. Based on my personal experience, past review campaigns that offered bonuses and free spins are not worthwhile because the amount that may be withdrawn would still depend on your luck as a result of those rewards.
It would be more practical to reward participants Bitcoin and allow them to pick whether to use it for investing, trade, or gambling. To ensure that it would be worth paying for, you must ensure that you will need a good quality review. I also believe that you must hire a reliable manager to run your campaign.

well, you only saw a few comments and already drew conclusions, you already ran a signature campaign here on the forum and the signature campaign ended, I think that the participants of the signature campaign that your casino ran can see and analyze your casino, And what your team had to do was research your casino ssignature campaign members for the following:

1 - how many members of the signature campaign run by your casino used your casino to play?

2- how much money did members of your ssignature campaign spend playing at your casino?

3 - what were the games they liked to play the most?

4 - how much money that did not come from signature campaign earnings did members of the signature campaign run by your casino deposit in your casino, is it important that you know this?

you need to know the level of satisfaction of the members who can use your casino for some time, there is no point in creating a review campaign because the people who will participate in the campaign are people who will only use your casino for something like less than 3 hours only, that and little time to get to know every casino, you should have better talked to the subscription campaign manager when your signature campaign was running so they could have answers to those 4 questions I mentioned. It is important to explore marketing well. the signature campaign will be effective with a good strategy, for example: payments must be made directly into the account they have in your casino so that you have greater retention of people in your casino, in short, there are many strategies that you are the campaign manager signatures had to have implemented to be successful in the long term

another example:

🔵🔴 MEGA:PARI Question Quest: Answer Right and Score Free Bets!

It's a good strategy, but you have to explore topics that are attractive, such as NBA, UFC, Premier League games. if yesterday you had done for example the following:

prediction contest

predict will be the winner of the coppa italia and get $10 free bet

requirements: you have to bet 5$

there will be champions league matches, europe league, these are the kind of contests that attract people

The only bonus I see is a reward (fixed or dependable from the review) in Bitcoin on users wallet. Free spins, free bets, deposit bonus or on account and etc wont looks like a real reward, because users will test the platform while making a review, and forcing them to stay on your platform with bonuses does not look good. If they like it, they will return there anyway.

I think each user has their own opinion about review campaign, if you're not familiar enough in this forum and how to launch a successful review campaign, I recommend you to use hire a campaign manager, they're more familiar and know a way to promote it.

However in the end, it depends on how much money you want to spend, large is better than small.

OP, you should consider what was said by: @Trofo and @mindrust, their suggestions are common for crypto casinos here, if you want participants to improve your casino reviews.

If you are considering a bonus for participants participating in a 'REVIEW CAMPAIGN' that you would like to form and you are rewarding them with a bonus in the form of sports betting or playing in certain games in your casino, they may not be so interested in becoming a review participant, bonuses in the form of Bitcoin should be considered. with betting and deposit limits.

@Trofo has done a review for the casino here, he did something good and fun, all the review participants he received have a happy heart.

Many of us have suggested giving rewards in the form of BTC, which is a good recommendation, especially since BTC is the main coin in almost all the crypto casinos we use. As for the reward, I think it depends on how much money you want to use for the reward because some casinos give a reward of 5 mBTC. And you are free to determine the amount, but you should not be too small. And for the review, perhaps, you need to determine what to review so that the participant's review is not too broad.

Perfectly said, in addition ro what had been given already, it all depends on the financial strength of the platform to choose a particular rate they can afford to offer participants that have made review on their site, the number or participants they will accept review from and also set a criteria for making such review, there's nothing bad in getting a feedback on your performances as a casino, just to be able to serve people better.

Since you are looking for a limited amount of participants and reviewers, you should get a fixed budget for it and make it either in BTC or in a stablecoin which would then provide the winners the opportunity to purchase the cryptocurrency of their choice if they want or they can simply convert it to fiat through a P2P service if they need funds.

Paying this way will increase the chances of you getting the best reviews since people usually tend to work harder if they know they are going to get paid for their work, so if the budget is good enough for each participant, I'm sure it will be a successful campaign for you.

I guess with such bonuses or rewards for a review campaign, nothing beats the actual balance(BTC) that you'll give to the participants. I've seen such campaigns and you can be the one to decide how much you're going to reward the reviewer based on the review that has been made.
I think that's fair enough and you should give a range on how much the reward will be so that participants will have an idea on how much the reward will be if ever they're expecting the lowest or highest or even in between rewards that shall be rewarded to them.

From what I understand from the op, one wouldnt necessarily have to deposit to the casino to be chosen among the qualified reviewers, what op is interested in is the preferred payment method to users for their review, op is looking at awarding some kind of Casino bonus to the reviewers for their Review, the bonus could be any type of bonus, not necessarily a deposit bonus in particular..

But like the comment you quoted said, a bitcoin payment is the most appropriate and worthy payment for reviews, not a casino bonus, Many of us are not interested in casino bonuses since most times, they come with several strings attached.

   -  I support your suggestion on this mate, to keep the fight clean and fair when making a review here on something OP wants to happen. Because there are many people who tried to do this who did review the campaign but the only qualified ones are those who will deposit money on their platform.

it will look like you paid for being a participant in a review campaign, which is not a good strategy for someone running a review campaign here and what others have said here is also correct that it is better and nicer that a reputable manager should also hold or supervise because it is an advantage to easily attract communities that will support what OP wants to promote in the forum.

For me, the only way you are going to get quality review is if you will be paying for the review in bitcoin, several other casinos and businesses has in previous times ran review campaigns here on the forum, and they all paid in bitcoin, you could pay reviewers depending on their rank, like the one I was invited to join of recent, pays senior members $20 for their quality review and pays hero/legendary members $30, and if you see the spreadsheet of the reviewers, several high ranking and reputable members of this forum joined.

So if really you want a reviewer that is thorough and straight from a user's heart and experience of your platform, not particularly for the money, pay for it in bitcoin.

is there any chance to tell when this be happening ?  because you will only ask for 15 person but isn't it best to exceed from that counts?

[/quote]

I second your motion mate. Requesting for a possible rewards payment option is OK but atleast it would be nice they telling us when the event would take place too. Well, it is not too late as they just put up this thread and from the looks, they  must have made up their mind on the possible type of rewards to put up for the  review payment which is not bad. Requesting from the forum members their possible opinion on rewards looks good because it shows the voice of their clients or customers really matters to them and it is a good one to start with and they also value their customers. This is a sign of a good customer service from the mega pari team.

It seems that most members here is focusing to suggest what currency is the best for the reward but not many members suggest about what kind of bonuses is the best. There are many type of bonuses that can be given as reward for review campaign such as cash reward, free spins, free bet, or maybe other benefits that are available in the site. In my opinion, cash reward is the best one because it is a guaranteed money for the reviewer for their work to review the site. But maybe there are some other people who prefer to get free spins or free bet because the value can be bigger if they are lucky enough with the free spins or free bet especially if there is no wagering requirement for these free spins or free bet.

Count me in. I'm willing to review your casino the best way I possibly can. Like others said it's the best practice to send the amount to the personal wallets of the reviewers because you know that reviewing is a difficult thing and it requites time and testing of certain things. The reviewers can give their review even if they are not into gambling and if you only offer them free spins or bets as rewards then I don't think they will agree.

If you really want to have good and high quality reviews for your site then you should send the Bitcoin to the personal wallet of the reviewer and at the same time you should provide free bets and spins to the reviewers for the testing purposes. That way you will be able to get genuine reviews for your site and you'll be amazed with the quality.

Now back to my application, I will review the site so carefully by devoting much of my time to it. The review will be very detailed and will include my personal point of view regarding the services of the site. The review will include both pros and cons because I'll only share my personal opinion after testing the site and that might include some cons as well if I find any.

The bonus prize that most gamblers want is in the form of Bitcoin because indirectly by using Bitcoin we have also adopted it.
After all, Bitcoin is the currency that gamblers like the most when playing or betting, even for them to make deposits or withdrawals.
Even though the cost is somewhat more expensive, at least Bitcoin will be a bonus that seems amazing.
I also see a lot of feedback suggesting the use of Bitcoin.

A little question about the 15 participants, How would you choose the 15 participants so that it really looks fairer?

It seems that most people here on the forum would prefer the reward to review your casino be in bitcoins, which isn't a bad option at all. It gives everybody the highest flexibility as they can choose to do whatever with their money. It would also be my choice of reward if I can choose freely. But given that you are operating a casino and will likely have to offer free games and a certain balance for anybody to review all your games, you are already giving out a lot of bonuses. Another approach could be that you only focus on giving every reviewer a higher starting balance. Instead of paying out a fixed bitcoin amount you could just let everybody keep his balance he has on his account after the review. For example, if you start with giving everybody 30 USD as an initial bankroll for people to check all your games, then people could withdraw the money they manage to keep in the end. This makes the payouts a bit more random, but offers the best way for people to check out all the games on your casino.

This makes you wonder if the signature campaign did not give them the desired results or if the money ran out for this campaign? I do not know if better reward bonuses will draw in more people, because there are some stigma linked to these rewards.

Are these rewards worth it, if it comes with a bunch of "rules" that you have to adhere to? (Rollover requirements)? A lot of the successful casinos do not offer these bogus rewards, they run competitions and challenges for large prizes.

Not sure if you guys are not checking the review campaigns from the past and some are still running now .
all of those happened paying in bitcoins , some are dollars of course  but the thing here is paying money and not from other forms .

is there any chance to tell when this be happening ?  because you will only ask for 15 person but isn't it best to exceed from that counts?

What can be better than awarding Bitcoins for the review? I mean you are asking members of a Bitcoin forum about rewards, so definitely we would say we want Bitcoins. For each valid reviews, you can send some Bitcoins to the user’s game account in site and make sure there is no limit added to that funds. If you want more quality reviews, then you can do a contest either where users will compete, and make sure you award the best reviews by the members. Also if possible give a consolation prizes to all the participants also.

I am not swayed by the aforementioned suggestions, but objectively speaking, Bitcoin is a worthy reward for a review campaign. Every individual or group undoubtedly requires feedback, criticism, and advice in order to grow. And it is evident that numerous ongoing or concluded review campaigns on this forum have ended with Bitcoin rewards for participants.

Another suggestion is to employ a professional campaign manager. The presence of a campaign manager greatly influences the outcomes you receive.

Nothing best you can offer and accept from Bitcointalk forum members for the reviews you wanted than "BITCOIN" .

You can find every reviews conducted by New and even Old site that tries to advertise here here in service section  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0

for example here Review Campaign

but if you wanted to save some bucks then maybe a Free spins or free bets will be enough ? but it is better if you can give an actual amount directly to our wallets.

count me in for this review guys and Goodluck .

The others already gave the best answer (BTC), and i'd agree with them since that's what i've been paid for in the last two review campaigns that i've participated in, but only if you can shell out the necessary budget. Other forms of reward would be fine too (free spins or free bets), but their value needs to be higher or just enough for the minimum withdrawal because they're not easy to convert into cash prizes regardless of the wager requirement. I'll look forward to your review campaign since I already have an account on your casino but haven't used it yet.

When researching a platform, it's wise to consider a range of factors beyond just reviews, such as the platform's licensing and regulation, reputation in the industry, security measures, customer support, and overall user experience, so if the site wants to pay or incentivise reviews they are only covering a part of the many requirements that users tend to have when choosing who to play with.

I agree that the bonus should be in bitcoin, but I'd accept a casino credit as well, provided that there's no wager requirement on that bonus.

I have participated in a review campaign and it was done in the following way.
I had to make an account and post the name in the thread as application. The account was credited with x amount of money with a wager requirement. After the review was submitted, I was given additional money to my casino account and could withdraw that with whatever I had left from the previous one.


It's not a must. A review campaign pays just once, it's not a continuous service like a signature campaign. Someone from the casino can manage that.
Also, this casino had a campaign on the forum so there was a manager working with them. You don't have to tell them what to do, they seem to know it already.

Yes, they are doing good in their signature campaign for branding, reviews are good but signature still has a big impact on branding which is why top online casinos prefer to have a long-term campaign here for continuous presence and branding, and about reviews, its obvious people want to get paid with Bitcoin but like all the other comments it should be open reviews with pen feedbacks not only positive.

^You won't encounter any problem if the reward is BTC because that is not against the forum rule, if you can see on the guidelines, there is no altcoins giveaways. I have participated in a campaign like this before, the casino owner send BTC worth $10 plus a free spin, the good thing is you can able to withdraw the money without any wage requirements and it is your choice if you want to gamble or withdraw the BTC.
Well, good luck with your campaign, you can count me in either.

Trofo's suggestion is the best here in the thread, it tackles those who want BTC and those who want free spins/free bets. you can also give an option for the reviewer whether they want BTC+free spins only or BTC+free bets only.

Having just like this can be more successful to the site and i think the site can also offer a free spins for those successful reviews to encourage more to actually try the site and give the actual review. Paying in BTC can also be a good idea so the whole thread will stay at service section where you can see most of the campaign are there. Review site should also not be limited about what to say, paying bracket can be good as well based on the quality of the review.

I just wanted to look for this campaign thread to leave it here as an example. I agree here, this was one of the better review campaigns. Win-win situation, the participants received a solid reward, and tested the platform, while the owners received many useful impressions and pointed out potential shortcomings.

I guess the review campaign should primarily serve to get direct opinions from users, paying complimentary feedback often seems fake and may not always be appropriate.

For me paying in Bitcoin will be cool but I don't think there is any need for us to go straight to his website and create account just to get the bonus. Since he said he is looking for a simple bonus system he will use to compliment the community based on some certain conditions he has not yet disclose then the task should be something that everyone would be very interesting in for both people that may have account there and those who will love to use his platform if he cares more about that. There are many ways to select people that would benefit from the bonus and it has to be randomly nit first come first serve.

Team_MegaPari I will also advise you to reopen your signature campaign alongside with the Review Campaign. Now your review campaign will be a very big help to the signature campaign and your website. Since you need our thoughts on the bonuses, I will say you should give the to those who will register to the site without deposit, once the person registered then the person should unlock his bonuses through a simple click of some links. That will make people to visit the site more and also let it be that customers will anot abuse the bonuses your detriment.

Bitcoin seems to be the best answer we could give you right now. There are a lot of campaigns out here paying people with bitcoins, and everyone's pretty happy that way. And since you guys are only going to accept at least 15 blokes for this task I don't think forking up an extra couple hundred dollars to finance a campaign manager is going to be necessary, as said by previous members of this thread. What you would need however, and I say this with anticipation, is an unbiased review. I've seen review campaigns be so biased to the organizers that it almost felt like there shouldn't even be a review campaign made in the first place if all the participant's gonna do is just throw admiration and praise to the project without looking at it objectively and filtering everything that a regular user may find annoying and unhelpful.

So hope things go well for you guys.

That's why you use campaign managers - so they can pick users that will give good feedback and create a campaign that will give good value for money.

If you go through the review campaign that Trofo and myself ran for Coinslotty, you'll see that the received feedback was concrete and totally authentic. Coinslotty changed a lot of things based on that feedback and improved as a casino because of it.

Every casino review that is given is based on what each player has as an experience and what they like, according to what they give their opinion that should be respected, but I think that every player likes it is that they are encouraged, there is nothing It is better for a casino to have contests where they can be encouraged to participate and win without having to do anything else, that is, if a player wins, that the bonus be free without any requirement, obviously the bonus must be in bitcon and completely withdrawable, like first option and if they are looking for options so that they can give bonuses that are not things that cannot be done, for example if they make a requirement that does not exceed 1x.

As other have already mentioned that there's no better reward than bitcoin and I would definitely agree on that but also would like to add 2 more points.
You should consider being very selective when adding the 15 participants to your review campaign otherwise the result won't be much fruitful.
Also, you can give away those rewards in your casino site so that participants try out the casino without paying additional transaction fees.
This will benefit the site since they will get 15 users right out of the box.

As other suggested, People want to get bitcoins as a payment for campaign instead of casino rolls/credits etc.. Paying bitcoin directly is attractable to the forum members as we can see from past review campaigns in this forum who are using bitcoin to pay their participants. I'm positive that people will review your casino with the member limit you had set. I think that 15 people can be managed easily as it is few. I don't think that you need a manager for this task as this is a small task that a marketing team of your casino can do and you can watch the participants review closely.

Well, I must say, there are a few conflicting thoughts running through my mind on this one. On one hand, I can understand your point about incentivized reviews. It does raise concerns about transparency and the potential for manufactured or biased feedback. It's true that if people are solely motivated by bonuses, their reviews might not hold much value.

However, on the other hand, one could argue that offering incentives might encourage more people to participate and share their experiences, leading to a wider range of feedback. Additionally, it's possible that some participants genuinely appreciate the bonuses and are willing to provide honest reviews. Take for example the review campaigns that some other casinos have organized in the past. It's hard to argue that all those reviews were fake or insincere, especially when you consider that not all of them were glowing recommendations. In fact, many participants provide genuine feedback, both positive and negative, sharing their real experiences.

So before jumping to conclusions about Megapari's campaign, let's give it a fair chance and see what kind of reviews they receive. Only then can we judge the authenticity and credibility of the feedback received. People can still provide honest feedback, even if there are rewards involved.

It depends.

If the @OP give incentive for the top 10 best reviews, this will increase the possibility people will write a positive review since they only want to become top 10 reviewers. But this would be different if the @OP give incentive before the users give reviews, the users are free to criticism, write positive or bad review because they already get the money, they have nothing to lose here.

Do you think people will make a review without get paid? maybe only few users, they also wouldn't put an effort. When a gambler win some money, they're mostly silent, only few users are write 1-2 liners of positive reviews.

I would have to say that ratings and reviews should not be incentivized in the first place.

That seems incredibly intransparent and the review will not really be worth much. If anything this is just Megapari asking for a manufactured, inauthentic review from their own gambling community.  Of course they will only give a positive review, not only because those people want a bonus for their account but also because they are already biased in favor of the casino.

That's really a bit disappointing. I am not sure if I would want to trust such a casino after this.

I have never participated in a review campaign for a casino before the only review campaign I took part in was that of a mixer (whirlwind.money) from my experience there I'll like to suggest something.

First, it will be best to use Bitcoin for the reward, and the payment should not be fixed. Each review should be paid based on what it contains because if you make the payment fixed everyone would want to participate which would result in them copying previous casino reviews without actually testing your casino.

TL; DR:
Pay with Bitcoin, payment should not be fixed but instead based on how detailed the review submission is (you could use suggestions to give bonuses also).

if you only want to get reviews from your old users, all of them will not give problems for your platform. but if you want good-quality reviews from gamblers and members on forums. you can pay with Bitcoin.
several other platforms have already started first. they created a review campaign and paid with Bitcoin. why don't you do it? do you want to give a gift by credit to their account? if that's your way, maybe you have to be prepared for an account to make withdrawals without KYC or a minimum bet.

Somebody tagged me to this thread so I will add my two cents. For your purposes it seems to me best combination would be BTC + free spins on the site. BTC directly to the reviewers as their fee and targeted free spins to the specific games you want tested. Or free bets for sportsbook.

You can check our recent campaign that was a great success and copy some ideas:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61603346

Or if you want help with the campaign shoot me a PM with all the details and maybe we can agree on something. I am running everything with my colleague cryptofrka to guarantee better coverage and availability at all times.

Many of us here would appreciate receiving bitcoins as compensation for our effort and time spent reviewing your casino. However, it might be worth considering a combination of different incentives. By offering a range of bonuses like free spins, or even VIP perks, you can provide a comprehensive incentive package. This approach would showcase the casino's appreciation for reviewers and its commitment to establishing a mutually beneficial relationship.

In addition, it would be useful to establish clear guidelines and criteria for the reviews, ensuring the quality of the feedback received. By doing so, you can effectively reward participants while also gaining valuable insights to enhance your casino offerings. Given the existence of several review campaigns for different casinos on this forum, it would be beneficial for you to analyze and learn from their approaches. Understanding what has worked well in those campaigns can help you design a successful review campaign that meets the expectations of participants and yields valuable feedback for your casino.

Pay in Bitcoin but not on your site but directly on the reviewers wallet but having lot of options to choose for the reviewer would make a lot of sense since others may have different preferences when it comes to rewards.

You can visit Games and Rounds to see what other casinos have to offer when they need a review from the rest of us. And the casinos are giving BTC rewards to attract more people to reviews. Nothing beats BTC in terms of rewards and we know it will be a challenge for participants. But you can also reward in USDT or award Free Spins to the winner with no wagering requirements.

Thanks to all for your answers! We will prepare the campaign and release it in near future. The thread was created to collect opinions to better understand your needs and desires C:

Err depends on what kind of rewards we can actually get. If there's no limit, then coins, preferably Bitcoin or some other famous altcoins. We can get the tokens developed and released by the casinos we're going to review for but ehh, I'd much rather get some sort of free spins or something of the sort instead of those, coins from new casinos are a sort of "investment" in reality and as a gambler, I don't really think I'd appreciate that. I'd honestly put a cash reward, whether in Bitcoin or a flat amount of fiat in the casino account as the top option, the next would be probably some bonus perks if you're going to do reviews rarely, like permanent ones, or if you're doing this regularly, then yea bonus free spins would probably be the only option by then.

i believe the bonus should be in bitcoins to our wallet just like other review campaigns that have already been done in bitcointalk.
since you have a casino and Sports then maybe put 2 different rewards but the user can only choose 1 of them, like a casino balance for people choosing this and a free bet option for the sports review.

I agree with users who're recommend you to pay with Bitcoin especially you pay upfront payment to make them exploring your casino. Don't pay with altcoins because your thread will be placed in bounty section where good users most likely will not visit it and you only get spammers.

They previously have launched a campaign where Royse777 is the campaign manager [PAUSE] Signature Campaign MEGAPARI Betting Company | $2.50 BTC per post reward it has been around for 22 weeks and now the campaign was paused.

You guys may choose to reward the participants either to pay them in btc or other token, or to give like a referral bonus or in game token. I think it would be better for both sides if the reward will be the platform's token in order for players to make use of it in the site and for gambling site ofcourse since the rewards will be somewhat returned to them than to just be taken away such as if the payment is in usd or btc based. If it would be in form of btc as a regular payment, then expect non gamblers would also participate just for the reward and that may conflict the reliability of the reviews 'coz it will just be a constructed review and not experienced based review in the viewpoint of a gambler.

OP in as much as you are on bitcointalk platform which other rewards do I know best other bitcoin. I would very much appreciate it if the rewards you tend to accept to give out be in bitcoin. As you can see from other response and replies, all tarries and are in tandem with the opinion of rewarding participants in bitcoin. So therefore, it would be nice you adopt and enact it immediately so that all would be ok with it.

Looking forward to seeing you accept the proposal of accepting bitcoin as rewards for the review campaign.

Fixed cash reward is still the most used reward for most review campaign, the cash can be sent directly into reviewer's personal wallet or it can be sent to reviewer's account in your casino.
Other alternative scenario can be by having review contest where the best reviewers will share the prizepool.
Here is an example:
- Top 3-5 reviewers will get a share of 50-70% from the prizepool (can be equally or based on position 1st 2nd 3rd etc).
- Other reviewers will get a share from the remaining prizepool but it should be limited to specific number of valid reviewers.
With this kind of contest, participants will try their best to review your site and I think that you will get better feedback with such review contest.
Just my 2 cents.

I agree with my colleagues. In the past I have participated in a couple of review campaigns (one of them for a casino: Coinslotty) and both were paid in satoshis. In addition, if you want to announce it in Economy>Marketplace, I think this is the way to go, because bounties, prizes, bonuses... paid in altcoins should go in the alternative cryptocurrencies section.

Rewards ranged from 60$ to 95$ per review (bonus included), which is a good price to me.

Anyway, if you're thinking in creating a good campaign here in bitcointalk, let me recommend that you hire a good campaign manager like Trofo, who very professionally managed the aforementioned.

Personally, I would want it to be in form of Bitcoin. But in case you do not want it, I might like it being in my Megapri wallet or in a form of free spins (at least around ~$0.2. $0.4 will be better ).
Bonus feature would also suffice as reward (e.g., bonus feature on Sweet Bonanza).

Question.
Is this the thread where you also want to get the participants? If so, can you count me in? If not, then I'll be looking forward for that review campaign thread.

Good luck!

Nothing beats hard cash(BTC) as a reward without any bullshit requirements since this is payment for the review on your casino. You can make this cash deposit on our Megapari account so that we can use it already for writing the content of our review. Make sure to choose only natural gambler users so that you can be assured that the review is genuine and not a bullshit generic comment by just visiting your website without actual experience with it. Cash drop or Free bet on sportsbook without minimum odds requirements is fine rewards for me.

Count me in if you are already looking for participants and make sure to create a formal review campaign thread on services or game and rounds section depending on the rewards that you want to give.

What could be a juicer reward but Bitcoin as a reward, many casinos have launched this kind of campaign and they proved that it works so you'll just follow their lead, you should hire a manager who will pick participants because they know who they are going to pick and since you're only picking 15 participants I'm sure you can get the best reviewers for your campaign.

It's good that you launch this kind of campaign so gamblers will have ideas of what to expect from your casinos through these reviews.

First, you have to hire a manager who can provide the best advice so that the review campaign that you are doing can have an impact on the development of your casino.
Prizes must be in the form of bitcoins with a fairly attractive amount, I participated in several review campaigns with quite attractive prize offers so you will get applications from members who will give their best reviews, moreover, you said will only need 15 review participants so there will be no problem spending a budget for getting the best feedback. Freespin is not really liked because the results are uncertain even though it is given in big amounts but members here will prefer money with a definite value, so in my opinion, only prizes in the form of Bitcoins will be very attractive to the best reviewers from this forum.

I second this, there are already other review campaigns here and the majority are paying Bitcoin you can add other bonuses for reviewing there are members of this forum that are already members of your casino and they are more than willing to give your casino a review, but the reviews should be independent and you should willing to pay regardless of the kind of reviews, participants will give.

The reward should be bitcoins. I have recently joined a similar review campaign and they are paying bitcoins. You should do something similar. I mean you can give people some deposit bonus and similar crap but then you would force people to deposit money and nobody will do that probably. You are not going to attract any decent members that way. If you want to get quality reviews, you need to pay.