Topic: ~Hhampuz - page 2. (Read 1567 times)

Hey can you guys keep it down? I can't read over the deafening sound of you jerking each other off.

It's odd, then, that you should take any part in such a system.

Well the votes for DT say a different story fella. Democracy over. Dictatorship and you keep getting voted out, perhaps if you weren’t such a narcissistic Cunt it would be a different story

Once theymos let users like you into DT it was all over. All credibility of the system went out the window.

It is understandable that not many people want to appear as being responsible of flags, trusts, etc ...
To be honest, running a business and being involved in this place's politics is a very tight spot.

I believe at some point there is this "tipping point" in recognition where you don't need (and don't want !) to be in DT anymore.
Maybe this is it for Hhampuz. Hh definetely doesn't need to be in some list saying people can trust him. He's beyond that now.

Looking forward to reading your fabricated nonsense you call "evidence".

I really like and respect all of you who posted here in support of Hampz , but come on ya'll..the man doesn't want to be DT1 and I sure as hell can't blame him.  Respect his wishes.  DT1 comes with so much unnecessary political nonsense and drama..I don't know how it doesn't drive ya'll fn crazy.  Just setting my custom trust list caused more headaches in a couple weeks than I could have ever imagined.   Some of that DT1 related politics.  The man want's no more of it, why not respect his wishes? 

Hampz DT2 is where it's at. Your trust matters (or it did, I am not up to date w/new rules in that regard yet) with out all the nonsense.   

Yes for the LiveCoin campaign. Although the campaigns that Hhampuz runs seems to always pay more than what others run, have much more liberal posting requirements than campaigns run by others and other campaigns have no problem attracting other participants into their campaigns. The only exception is ChipMixer campaign that has been running for two years with the same rates.

You can draw your own conclusions, but I have privately speculated there are some shenanigans going on.

Is this true?
If so I might seriously think about getting into the campaign business..

I think it is more likely that someone is telling him that he is wrong in regards to his handling of the LiveCoin flag, and keeping the signature campaign open, and/or that I was not wrong for messaging those in the LiveCoin campaign to notify them of the now active flag.


I think Hhampuz should have done the right thing and close down the LiveCoin campaign. I get that the ~quarter BTC is a lot of money to earn from running it every month, but there is a good amount of evidence that LiveCoin is acting in a way that a reputable person should not want to be associated with -- preventing customers who publicly criticize the company from withdrawing their deposits -- and no amount of money should compromise his (or anyone who is participating in the campaign) ethics. If I were in his situation, I would most certainly be unhappy about having to give up that income, but I unequivocally would have done the right thing.   

I am able to confirm that he is correct about this particular rating.

His opposition to the LiveCoin flag (and a number of other flags) is questionable though.

I think this may be a wise decision..

You are a fine businessman/worker here on the forum but I don't much like your politics in some cases so think you could do well to stick to your business and stay out of controversies..
Anyone from any side becomes a target of their antagonists when they involve themselves in forum political drama so it may be wise to stay right out of that and do your own thing, especially someone like you with employment to lose.

My ~ is meaningless soo....

Tman seems to have nothing better to do. We are merely giving our opinion on the correct actions of excluding you. Plus our reasons for believing this is the correct action (supporting you goal of removal) and informing the reader of the background of TMAN  so that they may reach the optimal opinion themselves. Tman is pushing (we believe) incorrect information on your thread. Do you want that to stand unanswered?

The reader must be given all available information to allow them to form the optimal opinion on such matters. Anything thing else is sub-optimal.

We support your exclusion. What more assistance can we give? sorry for helping.


@actmyname

This seems off topic. However, we maintain that you are INCORRECT to claim we are seriously hyperbolizing this . There are far wider implications that you may not have considered. Especially with instances where initial distribution of tokens could be involved as bounties.

We believe first you should read some of our prior posts where this was explained in detail and there was no refutation. We already discussed this with HCP on the hhampuz possible stealing of 0.5btc thread.

We wish to say that our point still stands and that hhampuz should be excluded.

This is not the thread for that debate. If you read our prior posts (very recent with hhampuz or on his thread) and are not satisfied then we can start another thread to debate it with you.

I'm sure many of the DT that enjoy being part of the "select few" that seemingly are auto eligible to new highly paid sig campaigns have a low expectation of the trouble the current sig campaing managers should be expected to go to regarding the selection process. Not that we say you perhaps of all persons on this thread would not be suitable even should the entire board be give FAIR and EQUAL consideration. We find you to be of a far higher quality than most even if we have found you to be in our opinion incorrect in a few instances.

We risk having the post deleted if it goes off onto campaign manager best practices. This is hhampuz wanting to get excluded. We endorse his desire to be excluded.

Sometimes if you want to be in a position of trust you must face many chores to cast aside reasonable doubts of other members when called on to do so.

This user is currently ignored.

Is the best feat. in the forum about Blah blah things from CH.

Guess this is a never ending story with him !

@Hhampuz

I dont exclude you also as many others , sry !

Signature campaign selections don't need to be transparent. "Putting the entire board at possible risk" seems like you're seriously hyperbolizing the direness of the situation. If they're hired, they're hired.

Quality of a participant is the most important thing but I don't expect Hhampuz to give me a detailed breakdown of how he gauges quality and how every single participant was selected. That would be ludicrous.

Contrived accusations through assumptions via circumstantial evidence are interesting... but answering every accusation is quite a chore especially for someone so "popular".

I just said I've messaged theymos about it, and I'm here asking people to exclude me. There really is no point for the usual suspects to show up and beat a dead horse. My god, do you really not have anything better to do? 

We endorse hhampuz being excluded from DT.

The reader of this thread should have some background to consider.

TMAN you mean highly probable scammers such as yourself and your friend lauda (well he is a proven scammer)??

Senior members that are abusing the trust system to line their own pockets will not be missed at all.

Let's take a moment to read over some observable instances from Tmans and hhmapuz own histories.

First TMAN.  

The reader should be aware that TMAN has been involved in prior behaviors such as these mentioned by one of the most TRUSTED users on this forum ognasty. We quote ognasty below in red

Harassed user zeroxal as part of a confirmed and documented extortion scheme.

More details on the situation can be found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19349060

He also claimed I was trying to "pretend" my casascius coins were loaded: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/my-cass-coin-collection-1945817

He then sent BTC to my publicly known address unsolicited and claimed I was trying to self escrow: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ognasty-self-escrowing-bets-and-not-listening-to-the-community-to-resolve-1946305

I don't trust this user, and his behavior on this forum in the time period from 6/2/17-6/4/17 should make that clear to anyone.

Not to mention this dumb ass admits he has never made an original thought inspiring post that he will dare present for analysis. He claims his MERIT SCORE is warranted due to his ENTERTAINMENT value with comprises of some childish swearing and sexual deviance smeared all over the board. He has no merit. He is a low functioning untrustworthy dreg that deserves no merit at all.

Even THEYMOS has excluded TMAN and his dumb ass scamming friend lauda from DT.



Next let us consider hhampuz.

1. He refuses to be transparent regarding his selection process for his sig campaigns. Thus opening himself, his projects and those he employs open to criticism and doubt. Putting the entire board at possible risk under certain conditions.  WHY NOT BE TRANSPARENT??

2. He supported the doxing of a forum treasurer. The doxing was provided by the idiot VOD posting here in this thread (that should really be banned for such a stupid and vicious attack)

3. There is a matter of 0.5btc possibly being stolen from a project that he was working with. He has not answered to clear this matter up even if it is not true. The truth is still not known.


So yes, it is best HHampuz is excluded and so should TMAN and Lauda.

We notice suchmoon is here trying to snipe at Theymos again who she back stabbed in public because he DARED to SUGGEST that we don't want PROVEN scammers and trust abusers on DT. LOL  Some believe this is an alt of lauda.

Actually this entire thread is full of those that are SHADY or support or have supported in the past SHADY individuals and included them into DT.

The reader should take note that these SAME people all seem to be creaming off the BEST PAID sig spots on the board and therefore not so happy about the new trust system that essentially rolls back their power to abuse and game the current systems to ensure these BEST PAID spots go to THEMSELVES.

Good to see this bunch crying about the new changes that mean you can't give out scam tags to whistle blowers any longer.

The reader should exclude Hhampuz not just because he requests it, but because you only want those that are willing to be transparent and honest. Same for TMAN. Get these dirt bags out.

I suspect this is a pre-emptive distraction from the incoming Livecoin drama bound to unfold...

You can easily do what I did.  Identified a few idiots and ignore them.  Made all the drama go away, and left them mumbling to themselves for a while.

What would you do if a major new client wanted a banner campaign with a manager on DT?

Don't burn your bridges. 

I love you hh but this is a bit of a dick move to get yourself out of DT:



You didn't have to do that.

If only there were a way to add someone to your trust list without adding them to the central trust list...

(other than using your alt to do a depth-1 trust and then trusting your alt, which is also not a great solution)

---

Unfortunately, drama will plague users whether they're on DT or not. :/