...
If this were bitconnect I would likely tag campaign members until they left it. I was well versed on that topic so it makes sense. Some DT members would refrain for whatever reasons that may be completely legit. There's a lot going on here. DT are not paid moderators here either.
...
I've been thinking about this too. It is not like Livecoin scammed hundreds of people. This is an unprofessional exchange being run by amateurs who don't even know how to write a proper ToS or care enough to hire someone who knows how to do so.
Did Livecoin fuck izoomrud over? Yes they did indeed. (against izoomrud's claims they couldn't show any palpable defense)
But there are hundreds of those examples. There are shitton of locked account reports about poloniex as well. (or there used to be, I remember a few) But nobody from poloniex is around, nobody's running a sig camp for polo, so no noise.
Livecoin and their alt account got red'ed and flagged and...
I believe camp participants shouldn't be red trusted for that but on the other hand I don't want Livecoin promoting their exchange without solving the izoomrud's issue neither.
Tagging the participants is an extreme measure but not tagging them means Livecoin can do as they please like something haven't happened at all.
Hard to decide.
***All livecoin has to do is; unlock izoom's account. He probably won't be able withdraw any MONA's since there is no MONA's but I remember he told that he had btc on his account too. Let him withdraw and everybody's happy. About his MONA balance, I didn't hear anybody (at least around here in this forum) complaining about their mona balance. If it becomes a mass scamming by Livecoin, then sig camp participants should be tagged indeed.